NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:26:05 -0500 From: "Hellen" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: breadth or depth first? Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:26:04 -0400 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-ID: Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.156.161.236 X-Trace: sv3-UUcPtO7iTcy80qnh4sZFNe3QdQ723YWrsUafMH9dShVf+Gev1TEWMk0BChDTv2V5Ly2dJgwUUqC8lP+!RCZkagndc4oKEdNg8ECCI1oXxbp7epoLMf9jPYohhicuwUIjpwtpfQBSx2yx6CyNUO66JtVcoA== X-Complaints-To: abuse@rogers.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: radman@rogers.wave.ca X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.20 Path: nightfall.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.rogers.com!news.rogers.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: nightfall.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:20133 My current dilemma : whether to do treatments "breadth-first" ("apply" a symbol to the head, neck, body and so on down to feet, then start again with the second symbol from head to neck and so on) or to take, say, the head first, "apply" all symbols in sequence then move to the next body part and so on. Well, there's always the answer that "as you feel necessary", but that would close most of the discussions on the AHR before they even begin :-) So, given: a) a living being with some health issues to solve. the being is considered as consisting of "body parts" (physical classification) or "systems" (functional classification) b) a set of symbols (and/or their associated meaning/intention) What combinations do you see being used? Thanks, Hellen ###### From: suzee Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: Re: breadth or depth first? Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:51:55 -0400 Organization: Michigan State University Lines: 27 Message-ID: <417F8BDB.8330CE04@imbris.com> References: Reply-To: qiuser@yahoo.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.179.66.12 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AUTHid: fordkenn X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en Path: nightfall.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!newsmi-eu.news.garr.it!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!hammer.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail Xref: nightfall.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:20144 Hellen wrote: > > My current dilemma : whether to do treatments "breadth-first" ("apply" a > symbol to the head, neck, body and so on down to feet, then start again with > the second symbol from head to neck and so on) or to take, say, the head > first, "apply" all symbols in sequence then move to the next body part and > so on. Well, there's always the answer that "as you feel necessary", but > that would close most of the discussions on the AHR before they even begin > :-) > > So, given: > > a) a living being with some health issues to solve. the being is considered > as consisting of "body parts" (physical classification) or "systems" > (functional classification) > b) a set of symbols (and/or their associated meaning/intention) > > What combinations do you see being used? > > Thanks, > Hellen How about do all the symbols over the entire body first, then do the hand positions. sue ###### From: "ShadowWolf" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki References: Subject: Re: breadth or depth first? Lines: 49 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <43Nfd.45065$yP2.34813@tornado.tampabay.rr.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:06:08 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.204.150.54 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: tornado.tampabay.rr.com 1098882368 68.204.150.54 (Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:06:08 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:06:08 EDT Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com Path: nightfall.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.imp.ch!news.imp.ch!209.11.36.156.MISMATCH!nntp-server.pubsub.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!cyclone.southeast.rr.com!news-post.tampabay.rr.com!tornado.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: nightfall.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:20146 Hi Hellen, What I teach my students is to use all the symbols in the beginning of the session. In using all the symbols rather than one or two you are accepting all the energy that is available rather than attempting to manipulate it according to your personal needs to help the receiver. The healing is between Creator and the receiver, we are merely conduits or assistants. Namaste' ShadowWolf PS Reiki which is Spiritual Energy Life Force {S.E.L.F.} is all inclusive. "Hellen" wrote in message news:b4CdnWwGXvfQiOLcRVn-1A@rogers.com... > My current dilemma : whether to do treatments "breadth-first" ("apply" a > symbol to the head, neck, body and so on down to feet, then start again > with > the second symbol from head to neck and so on) or to take, say, the head > first, "apply" all symbols in sequence then move to the next body part and > so on. Well, there's always the answer that "as you feel necessary", but > that would close most of the discussions on the AHR before they even begin > :-) > > So, given: > > a) a living being with some health issues to solve. the being is > considered > as consisting of "body parts" (physical classification) or "systems" > (functional classification) > b) a set of symbols (and/or their associated meaning/intention) > > What combinations do you see being used? > > Thanks, > Hellen > > > > > >