From: "John Neiberger" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: Missing a distant attunement Lines: 16 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.8.47.201 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s51 1073363996 24.8.47.201 (Tue, 06 Jan 2004 04:39:56 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 04:39:56 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 04:39:56 GMT Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!attbi_s51.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12483 I know that a distant Reiki attunement is not exactly sensitive to time. A master can intend that the attunement be for a past or a future time. But what happens if a master sends a distant attunement for a certain time and the recipient isn't able to be calm and receive it at that time, or what if they forget completely about it until later on in the day? Since the attunement was intended to have happened earlier, is it too late at that point to 'retrieve' the attunement? Or is Reiki so insensitive to time that it doesn't matter and all the recipient has to do is intend to receive it? What is your experience in such matters? John ###### NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 23:45:28 -0600 From: "gw" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki References: Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <_tSdnXzBYe3l1mei4p2dnA@idworld.net> Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.142.70.4 X-Trace: sv3-ArqZPX9kjJxPz688MXcy89lVi6LTSpGca34DdH9F7CvLftqRrXHSRXtLMvWG+PoOY/hDDLmSF7ZzBbB!ZOy2TEhSx7fciLTaKPb45+erMAwUCu2r7RShn6HAoIyhXow0XusrmkS9X78iZwuMeahimdhZww== X-Complaints-To: abuse@idworld.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@idworld.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.cambrium.nl!news.cambrium.nl!news.cambrium.nl!news2.euro.net!216.166.71.118.MISMATCH!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.idworld.net!news.idworld.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12490 No, just go back and pick up the attunement. Set yourself up the regular way to get a distance attunement, and make sure you focus on the time and place the attunement was for if appropriate. This sort of thing works great--I discovered with the Violet Flame Reiki you could go back and pick up the same attunement many times, in fact, although the second and third time seemed to have lost it's initial "oomph", it was still valid. You shouldn't have any problems picking up the attunement as offered. Reiki does respond to time, to a certain extent, but mainly by staying put where we place it in a distance attunement. Remember time seems mostly to be an illusion. If you go back to a certain time and place, you will perceive the attunement (if it's meant for you) and you can easily acquire the energy. hope this helps. gw > I know that a distant Reiki attunement is not exactly sensitive to time. A master can intend that the attunement be for a past or a future time. But what happens if a master sends a distant attunement for a certain time and the recipient isn't able to be calm and receive it at that time, or what if they forget completely about it until later on in the day? > Since the attunement was intended to have happened earlier, is it too late at that point to 'retrieve' the attunement? Or is Reiki so insensitive to time that it doesn't matter and all the recipient has to do is intend to receive it? > ###### From: "Daemon Weird" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:20:40 +0100 Organization: IskonInternet d.d. Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <_tSdnXzBYe3l1mei4p2dnA@idworld.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: zg05-102.dialin.iskon.hr X-Trace: sunce.iskon.hr 1073377247 9984 213.191.138.103 (6 Jan 2004 08:20:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@iskon.hr NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Jan 2004 08:20:47 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.belwue.de!fu-berlin.de!Iskon!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12501 could you, please, direct me to find ones who does violet flame reiki, i am very interested about bless and hugs daemon "gw" wrote in message news:_tSdnXzBYe3l1mei4p2dnA@idworld.net... > No, just go back and pick up the attunement. Set yourself up the regular way > to get a distance attunement, and make sure you focus on the time and place > the attunement was for if appropriate. > > This sort of thing works great--I discovered with the Violet Flame Reiki you > could go back and pick up the same attunement many times, in fact, although > the second and third time seemed to have lost it's initial "oomph", it was > still valid. > > You shouldn't have any problems picking up the attunement as offered. Reiki > does respond to time, to a certain extent, but mainly by staying put where > we place it in a distance attunement. Remember time seems mostly to be an > illusion. If you go back to a certain time and place, you will perceive the > attunement (if it's meant for you) and you can easily acquire the energy. > hope this helps. > gw > > > I know that a distant Reiki attunement is not exactly sensitive to time. A > master can intend that the attunement be for a past or a future time. But > what happens if a master sends a distant attunement for a certain time and > the recipient isn't able to be calm and receive it at that time, or what if > they forget completely about it until later on in the day? > > Since the attunement was intended to have happened earlier, is it too late > at that point to 'retrieve' the attunement? Or is Reiki so insensitive to > time that it doesn't matter and all the recipient has to do is intend to > receive it? > > > > ###### NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:52:21 -0600 From: "gw" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki References: <_tSdnXzBYe3l1mei4p2dnA@idworld.net> Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:56:28 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: Lines: 71 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.142.70.83 X-Trace: sv3-rS5MnOQo/pGwVMW8hDkkAZpsUJEuXCofbeJr9CDprMRsSGldWWx7NtBnL9+Dv19c9WmFieTSLpMbgPh!VLS57SMh1MYTfSWrUHuYIUS9rmLOBYSAQpiLZzVQy3Q9St08YLyrP1+QEBGTfBrVl72ac9u6xgg= X-Complaints-To: abuse@idworld.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@idworld.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.multikabel.nl!news2.euro.net!216.166.71.118.MISMATCH!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.idworld.net!news.idworld.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12541 It is done in a group with Ivy Moore, at groups.yahoo.com called Violet Flame Reiki. It is free, and was given to Ivy by the Lady Quan Yin, in return Ivy has to make sure it's given for free. There is a manual at the site, mostly about the Lady and some practices, (one which I wrote as a class exercise for my last attunement in Usui Reiki) and Ivy has one as well. Others give the attunements now, I think, in turn. I was there for about a year, and worked very hard on taking my turn at attunements, but like others I had to move on. The group is very pleasant, and receptive to everyone but spammers (lol). hope this helps. gw "Daemon Weird" wrote in message news:btdr4v$9o0$1@sunce.iskon.hr... > could you, please, direct me to find ones who does violet flame reiki, > i am very interested about > bless and hugs > daemon > "gw" wrote in message > news:_tSdnXzBYe3l1mei4p2dnA@idworld.net... > > No, just go back and pick up the attunement. Set yourself up the regular > way > > to get a distance attunement, and make sure you focus on the time and > place > > the attunement was for if appropriate. > > > > This sort of thing works great--I discovered with the Violet Flame Reiki > you > > could go back and pick up the same attunement many times, in fact, > although > > the second and third time seemed to have lost it's initial "oomph", it was > > still valid. > > > > You shouldn't have any problems picking up the attunement as offered. > Reiki > > does respond to time, to a certain extent, but mainly by staying put where > > we place it in a distance attunement. Remember time seems mostly to be an > > illusion. If you go back to a certain time and place, you will perceive > the > > attunement (if it's meant for you) and you can easily acquire the energy. > > hope this helps. > > gw > > > > > I know that a distant Reiki attunement is not exactly sensitive to time. > A > > master can intend that the attunement be for a past or a future time. But > > what happens if a master sends a distant attunement for a certain time and > > the recipient isn't able to be calm and receive it at that time, or what > if > > they forget completely about it until later on in the day? > > > Since the attunement was intended to have happened earlier, is it too > late > > at that point to 'retrieve' the attunement? Or is Reiki so insensitive to > > time that it doesn't matter and all the recipient has to do is intend to > > receive it? > > > > > > > > > ###### From: "ShadowWolf" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki References: Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Lines: 34 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: <8JNKb.205946$b01.4569449@twister.tampabay.rr.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 06:31:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.33.138.52 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: twister.tampabay.rr.com 1073457092 65.33.138.52 (Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:31:32 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:31:32 EST Organization: RoadRunner - Central Florida Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!news-post.tampabay.rr.com!twister.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12544 How it works! An attunement takes place "Only" when the individual desiring to become active in the use of the reiki system participates (Accepts that the ability to exchange energy exhist within them). It is not hanging out in space/time waiting because someone's ego says so. -- ShadowWolf http://www.mysticreiki.com http://www.reiki.net "John Neiberger" wrote in message news:w_qKb.139131$VB2.523336@attbi_s51... > I know that a distant Reiki attunement is not exactly sensitive to time. A > master can intend that the attunement be for a past or a future time. But > what happens if a master sends a distant attunement for a certain time and > the recipient isn't able to be calm and receive it at that time, or what if > they forget completely about it until later on in the day? > > Since the attunement was intended to have happened earlier, is it too late > at that point to 'retrieve' the attunement? Or is Reiki so insensitive to > time that it doesn't matter and all the recipient has to do is intend to > receive it? > > What is your experience in such matters? > > John > > > ###### From: "Daemon Weird" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:54:00 +0100 Organization: IskonInternet d.d. Lines: 85 Message-ID: References: <_tSdnXzBYe3l1mei4p2dnA@idworld.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: zg02-050.dialin.iskon.hr X-Trace: sunce.iskon.hr 1073483650 15542 213.191.130.51 (7 Jan 2004 13:54:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@iskon.hr NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jan 2004 13:54:10 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!newsmi-eu.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!fu-berlin.de!Iskon!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12554 tnx pal, love and light daemon the weird one "gw" wrote in message news:jNmdnas2eqgGA2ai4p2dnA@idworld.net... > It is done in a group with Ivy Moore, at groups.yahoo.com called Violet > Flame Reiki. It is free, and was given to Ivy by the Lady Quan Yin, in > return Ivy has to make sure it's given for free. There is a manual at the > site, mostly about the Lady and some practices, (one which I wrote as a > class exercise for my last attunement in Usui Reiki) and Ivy has one as > well. > Others give the attunements now, I think, in turn. I was there for about a > year, and worked very hard on taking my turn at attunements, but like others > I had to move on. The group is very pleasant, and receptive to everyone but > spammers (lol). > hope this helps. > gw > > "Daemon Weird" wrote in message > news:btdr4v$9o0$1@sunce.iskon.hr... > > could you, please, direct me to find ones who does violet flame reiki, > > i am very interested about > > bless and hugs > > daemon > > "gw" wrote in message > > news:_tSdnXzBYe3l1mei4p2dnA@idworld.net... > > > No, just go back and pick up the attunement. Set yourself up the regular > > way > > > to get a distance attunement, and make sure you focus on the time and > > place > > > the attunement was for if appropriate. > > > > > > This sort of thing works great--I discovered with the Violet Flame Reiki > > you > > > could go back and pick up the same attunement many times, in fact, > > although > > > the second and third time seemed to have lost it's initial "oomph", it > was > > > still valid. > > > > > > You shouldn't have any problems picking up the attunement as offered. > > Reiki > > > does respond to time, to a certain extent, but mainly by staying put > where > > > we place it in a distance attunement. Remember time seems mostly to be > an > > > illusion. If you go back to a certain time and place, you will perceive > > the > > > attunement (if it's meant for you) and you can easily acquire the > energy. > > > hope this helps. > > > gw > > > > > > > I know that a distant Reiki attunement is not exactly sensitive to > time. > > A > > > master can intend that the attunement be for a past or a future time. > But > > > what happens if a master sends a distant attunement for a certain time > and > > > the recipient isn't able to be calm and receive it at that time, or what > > if > > > they forget completely about it until later on in the day? > > > > Since the attunement was intended to have happened earlier, is it too > > late > > > at that point to 'retrieve' the attunement? Or is Reiki so insensitive > to > > > time that it doesn't matter and all the recipient has to do is intend to > > > receive it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ###### From: gdwill@earthlink.net (Garry Williams) Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:19:49 GMT Lines: 18 Message-ID: <3ffcafec.1656231@news.Individual.NET> References: <8JNKb.205946$b01.4569449@twister.tampabay.rr.com> Reply-To: gdwill@earthlink.net NNTP-Posting-Host: user-37ka1t7.dialup.mindspring.com (207.69.7.167) X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1073524556 7514234 207.69.7.167 ([218672]) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!takemy.news.telefonica.de!feedme.news.mediaways.net!telefonica.de!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!user-37ka1t7.dialup.mindspring.COM!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12591 On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 06:31:32 GMT, "ShadowWolf" wrote: >How it works! > > An attunement takes place "Only" when the individual desiring to become >active in the use of the reiki system participates (Accepts that the ability >to exchange energy exhist within them). > >It is not hanging out in space/time waiting because someone's ego says so. Agree about the ego part, but doesn't the time part rather depend on how you define time? Isn't all time now, and past and future merely illusion? ;-) Love and Light, Garry ###### From: "gingerobyn" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki References: Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Lines: 30 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: <9c7Lb.1845$4t3.1590@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 06:58:13 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.84.210.236 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny02.gnilink.net 1073545093 162.84.210.236 (Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:58:13 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:58:13 EST Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny02.gnilink.net.POSTED!f3340854!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12613 that's what i was wondering, i was also wondering if it's possible to recieve it before it's sent--because i felt i received something tonight that was related to janie's reconnective healing attunement. it could have been my suggestibility, it could have been general universal energy that is out there, or it could have been the 1:00pm attunement that janie sent and i was recieving it later. but could it have been the 10:00pm attunement arriving earlier since my subconscious was expecting it at 9:00 (i never did go online to find until well after midnight). any ideas from anyone? "John Neiberger" wrote in message news:w_qKb.139131$VB2.523336@attbi_s51... > I know that a distant Reiki attunement is not exactly sensitive to time. A > master can intend that the attunement be for a past or a future time. But > what happens if a master sends a distant attunement for a certain time and > the recipient isn't able to be calm and receive it at that time, or what if > they forget completely about it until later on in the day? > > Since the attunement was intended to have happened earlier, is it too late > at that point to 'retrieve' the attunement? Or is Reiki so insensitive to > time that it doesn't matter and all the recipient has to do is intend to > receive it? > > What is your experience in such matters? > > John > > ###### From: gdwill@earthlink.net (Garry Williams) Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:44:52 GMT Lines: 33 Message-ID: <3ffd4f0e.3524571@news.Individual.NET> References: <9c7Lb.1845$4t3.1590@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> Reply-To: gdwill@earthlink.net NNTP-Posting-Host: user-37ka0i3.dialup.mindspring.com (207.69.2.67) X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1073565658 7539891 207.69.2.67 ([218672]) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.belwue.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!user-37ka0i3.dialup.mindspring.COM!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12626 On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 06:58:13 GMT, "gingerobyn" wrote: >that's what i was wondering, i was also wondering if it's possible to >recieve it before it's sent--because i felt i received something tonight >that was related to janie's reconnective healing attunement. it could have >been my suggestibility, it could have been general universal energy that is >out there, or it could have been the 1:00pm attunement that janie sent and i >was recieving it later. but could it have been the 10:00pm attunement >arriving earlier since my subconscious was expecting it at 9:00 (i never did >go online to find until well after midnight). any ideas from anyone? Ginger, personally, I feel that you can receive any attunement at any time. We are used to thinking of time as a one-way arrow, but that's pretty much just how we perceive it. It may be that all time is now, it is just our perception of it that is so limited that we have to experience it sequentially instead of all at once. This would explain why you are able to tune in on an attunement "before" it takes place or "long after" it takes place. Alternatively, it's like Joseph suggests, any attunement is between you and The Creator, and the person performing the attunement really doesn't have any say-so in the matter. Come to think of it, those two explanations aren't mutually exclusive, either. Could be some of both! Does any of that ring true for you? Love and Light, Garry ###### NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:00:57 -0600 From: "Reikiskhm" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki References: <9c7Lb.1845$4t3.1590@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3ffd4f0e.3524571@news.Individual.NET> Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:54:57 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: Lines: 39 NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.36.96.98 X-Trace: sv3-4yVC55gdAWgx5oel+tuyEclP+guMTDUole2W2E9QikwfHgstFmQhxIQb905IlKGLECrhPqvkevVJ9JK!WJhLljgW6P+Bxbn2HaX79ZXizIYO/kd9AsDzapMYockD5HjAXQsADmO2XHE= X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.imp.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12644 "Garry Williams" wrote in message news:3ffd4f0e.3524571@news.Individual.NET... > Ginger, personally, I feel that you can receive any attunement at any > time. We are used to thinking of time as a one-way arrow, but that's > pretty much just how we perceive it. It may be that all time is now, > it is just our perception of it that is so limited that we have to > experience it sequentially instead of all at once. This would explain > why you are able to tune in on an attunement "before" it takes place > or "long after" it takes place. I mentioned this to my response to Ginger. Time as we think of it is not a factor at all. > Alternatively, it's like Joseph suggests, any attunement is between > you and The Creator, and the person performing the attunement really > doesn't have any say-so in the matter. I agree with Joseph on this definitely. Once I was doing a group of one-on-one attunements for quite a few people in all different time zones. Somehow I mixed up two of the names and times.......I attuned "susie" at 9pm and attuned "sally" at 11pm - and it should have been the reverse. Even thought I attuned the "wrong person at the "wrong" time, they both received the attunements when they were supposed to - when they accepted it. Long ago, I used to think I was "doing something" when I did an attunement, now I think of it more as "holding the space". I think the process begins when someone says or thinks "I think I'll get attuned to".......or the like. -- Blessings, - - - - - Janie Walk softly, Live gently ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Thoughts are Things, and They Create! ###### Message-ID: <3FFD8B9A.82F8B470@mn.rr.com> From: Alex Barna Organization: WorldWide_Spam_killers X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement References: <9c7Lb.1845$4t3.1590@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 26 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:55:54 -0600 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.30.225.94 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: twister.rdc-kc.rr.com 1073580935 65.30.225.94 (Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:55:35 CST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:55:35 CST Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!cyclone.socal.rr.com!cyclone2.kc.rr.com!news2.kc.rr.com!twister.rdc-kc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12645 Hi Ginger, gingerobyn wrote: > > that's what i was wondering, i was also wondering if it's possible to > recieve it before it's sent- Reiki/UE is not constrained by our concept of time or space. > -because i felt i received something tonight > that was related to janie's reconnective healing attunement. it could have > been my suggestibility, it could have been general universal energy that is > out there, or it could have been the 1:00pm attunement that janie sent and i > was recieving it later. but could it have been the 10:00pm attunement > arriving earlier since my subconscious was expecting it at 9:00 (i never did > go online to find until well after midnight). any ideas from anyone? When Janie did her 1pm attunement it put what could be called a ripple in the Reiki/UE (like dropping a pebble into still water) & when she did her 10pm attunement it reinforced that ripple, So anyone tuning into that ripple anywhere in time & space can accept it & what it passes to them. GramPaHugs, Alex, -- ###### From: suzee Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:53:03 -0500 Organization: Michigan State University Lines: 34 Message-ID: <3FFDC32F.BE3E4EB3@imbris.com> References: <9c7Lb.1845$4t3.1590@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3ffd4f0e.3524571@news.Individual.NET> Reply-To: qiuser@yahoo.com NNTP-Posting-Host: pm725-11.dialip.mich.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AUTHid: fordkenn X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!router3.news.adelphia.net!router1.news.adelphia.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.vt.edu!msunews!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12661 Reikiskhm wrote: > > "Garry Williams" wrote in message > news:3ffd4f0e.3524571@news.Individual.NET... > > Ginger, personally, I feel that you can receive any attunement at any > > time. We are used to thinking of time as a one-way arrow, but that's > > pretty much just how we perceive it. It may be that all time is now, > > it is just our perception of it that is so limited that we have to > > experience it sequentially instead of all at once. This would explain > > why you are able to tune in on an attunement "before" it takes place > > or "long after" it takes place. > > I mentioned this to my response to Ginger. Time as we think of it is not a > factor at all. > > > Alternatively, it's like Joseph suggests, any attunement is between > > you and The Creator, and the person performing the attunement really > > doesn't have any say-so in the matter. > > I agree with Joseph on this definitely. Once I was doing a group of > one-on-one attunements for quite a few people in all different time zones. > Somehow I mixed up two of the names and times.......I attuned "susie" at 9pm > and attuned "sally" at 11pm - and it should have been the reverse. Even > thought I attuned the "wrong person at the "wrong" time, they both received > the attunements when they were supposed to - when they accepted it. > > Long ago, I used to think I was "doing something" when I did an attunement, > now I think of it more as "holding the space". I think the process begins > when someone says or thinks "I think I'll get attuned to".......or the like. Yeah, like when I was a few minutes `late' settling down to receive... Then I `got' it, when I was ready. :) sue ###### From: "gingerobyn" Newsgroups: alt.healing.reiki References: <9c7Lb.1845$4t3.1590@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3ffd4f0e.3524571@news.Individual.NET> Subject: Re: Missing a distant attunement Lines: 26 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:03:15 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.84.157.110 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny02.gnilink.net 1073674995 162.84.157.110 (Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:03:15 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:03:15 EST Path: redlance.franklin.ch!pfaff2.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!irazu.switch.ch!switch.ch!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!63.218.45.11.MISMATCH!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!diablo.voicenet.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny02.gnilink.net.POSTED!f3340854!not-for-mail Xref: redlance.franklin.ch alt.healing.reiki:12685 yeah. your explanations make sense to me but i guess i just never feel certain about anything. thanks. > Ginger, personally, I feel that you can receive any attunement at any > time. We are used to thinking of time as a one-way arrow, but that's > pretty much just how we perceive it. It may be that all time is now, > it is just our perception of it that is so limited that we have to > experience it sequentially instead of all at once. This would explain > why you are able to tune in on an attunement "before" it takes place > or "long after" it takes place. > > Alternatively, it's like Joseph suggests, any attunement is between > you and The Creator, and the person performing the attunement really > doesn't have any say-so in the matter. > > Come to think of it, those two explanations aren't mutually exclusive, > either. Could be some of both! > > Does any of that ring true for you? > > Love and Light, > > Garry >