Message-ID: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 09:21:58 -0400 From: Tim Shoppa Organization: Trailing Edge Technology X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.03Gold (X11; I; OpenVMS V7.0 DEC 3000 Model 300L) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 82 NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.73.218.130 X-Trace: reader3.news.uu.net 957360119 7562 63.73.218.130 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!netnews.globalip.ch!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!ams.uu.net!zur.uu.net!ffx.uu.net!spool0.news.uu.net!reader3.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55289 sjm wrote: > > > Your only hope is that one of the four-hundred-and-eighty ongoing > projects to write a PDP-10 emulator will eventually produce > something that compiles. At least a third of these projects are also > completely imaginary, so don't get your hopes up. Those that aren't > will be ready for (limited) public review under strict NDA within > eight years if current agressive development schedules are met. A good number of the emulator (simulator?) authors are a bit afraid that releasing their current source code would require that they support it. I'm of the other opinion - if they release their current source code (I don't care if it's GPL or not GPL, I do *not* want to get into that religious war!) then others will support it. What's really encouraging is that several of the authors of the DECUS freeware in the archives have wandered across the collection and told me that they appreciate seeing software that they used or wrote themselves, sometimes 30 or more years ago. > TOPS-10 and TOPS-20 software is available online thanks to Tim Shoppa > and some anonymous donors. You're welcome :-). It's nice to see that at least I - and both the anonymous and not-so-anonymous donors mentioned at the archive home page, http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/ - come off as the good guys. We're really trying. I've seen some emulator progress mentioned here as a result of the sources being available and browsable, and that's a Good Thing. So far several hundred people have visited the archive site and downloaded or browsed through the software available, and that's a Good Thing too. > Plenty more would be, but the community > has largely, and very wisely, decided that it would be far better if > the existing software were allowed to mildew unsaved in basements. > This will preserve its purity so it is not touched by infidels. It really breaks my heart and pains me that so much software is out there just rotting away. Some of the current holders of the tapes don't understand that the tapes *are* still readable (sure, not everyone has 9-track and 7-track drives anymore, and not everyone has the ability to read and decode TOPS-10 BACKUP or TOPS-20 DUMPER tapes, but I do!), others don't understand that there is a wide interest in the software. There are some other organizations - such as computer museums - that probably don't understand the value of the tapes or disks they currently have in their collection. Many of these museums have members/volunteers that read this newsgroup, and I hope that those readers pay attemtion to my plea below. Thus I'll repeat my plea: If anyone has any PDP-10 software covered by the DEC 36-bit hobbyist license, please get it to me. I'll pay shipping both ways, and I'm an expert at archiving old data. Your tapes will be properly cared for, carefully read, and returned. If you want, you'll be thanked on the archive page for the stuff you provide, or if you prefer you can remain anonymous. Just don't let the software rot away! The best reference I can give is what I've done so far. Just look at http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/ and you'll find hundreds of megabytes of PDP-10 software, preserved in both *exact* tape or disk image form and as browsable, human-readable files. Both commercial software covered by the DEC 36-bit hobbyist license and the DECUS 10- and 20- freeware collections are available there. -- Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa@trailing-edge.com Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/ 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917 Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927 ###### From: jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx (Jay Maynard) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> Reply-To: jmaynard@texas.net Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.4 (UNIX) Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 10:58:38 CDT Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv2-kpVscKNZ7Bsf1Fe2k3RKE4X2j7U0tvp/L+2rn73EhnYilVpidjvH3nZ3shK79bKCBeLo7OTKPVeoRgJ!9vDFKmuXBRm2Y7ZiGzsTlA== X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 15:58:38 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.giganews.com!news4.giganews.com.POSTED!jmaynard Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55243 On Wed, 03 May 2000 09:21:58 -0400, Tim Shoppa wrote: >A good number of the emulator (simulator?) authors are a bit afraid >that releasing their current source code would require that they >support it. I'm of the other opinion - if they release their >current source code (I don't care if it's GPL or not GPL, I do >*not* want to get into that religious war!) then others will support >it. I'll second this, and add that the experience of the Hercules IBM mainframe emulator backs it up: most folks don't just say that there's a problem and that it should be fixed, but also contribute code to fix the problem. The maintainer has put in a bunch of work in integrating patches, but there's more than a small amount of code contributed by others (including me). ###### From: "Dave G." Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 20:52:27 +0100 Organization: CompuServe Interactive Services Lines: 27 Message-ID: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mfs-pci-bqe-vty30.as.wcom.net X-Trace: ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com 957383451 28121 212.211.0.30 (3 May 2000 19:50:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@compuserve.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 May 2000 19:50:51 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!portc03.blue.aol.com!news.compuserve.com!news-master.compuserve.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55370 Sorry for being obtuse, but what are the big problems emulating the PDP-10 (lack of documentation, transferring the original software, copyrights, or maybe just the scale of the endeavour)? I missed the beginning of this thread and this is all a bit before my time. Cheers, Dave. Jay Maynard wrote in message news:slrn8h0j5g.641.jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx... > On Wed, 03 May 2000 09:21:58 -0400, Tim Shoppa > wrote: > >A good number of the emulator (simulator?) authors are a bit afraid > >that releasing their current source code would require that they > >support it. I'm of the other opinion - if they release their > >current source code (I don't care if it's GPL or not GPL, I do > >*not* want to get into that religious war!) then others will support > >it. > > I'll second this, and add that the experience of the Hercules IBM mainframe > emulator backs it up: most folks don't just say that there's a problem and > that it should be fixed, but also contribute code to fix the problem. The > maintainer has put in a bunch of work in integrating patches, but there's > more than a small amount of code contributed by others (including me). ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> Organization: a user of Best Internet Communications, Inc. www.best.com From: falconer@best.com (Edward A. Falk) Date: 03 May 2000 20:27:05 GMT Lines: 64 Message-ID: <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ba.best.com X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 957385625 206 falconer@206.184.139.134 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news2.best.com!news3.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55345 In article <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com>, Dave G. wrote: >Sorry for being obtuse, but what are the big problems emulating the PDP-10 >(lack of documentation, transferring the original software, copyrights, or >maybe just the scale of the endeavour)? I missed the beginning of this >thread and this is all a bit before my time. Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to get the documentation. But there's more to the equation. Having written an emulator once, I have a couple comments to make. Writing an emulator for a CPU is actually quite easy. But it's only a tiny fraction of the job. Writing emulators for the peripherals also needs to be done, and this can seriously complicate matters. Further, you also need to correctly emulate the bugs and undocumented features. This sounds inane, but it's true. When people write code for a specific computer, they don't debug until the code works according to the specifications of the underlying hardware, they just debug until it works. If it happens that they've stumbled across a hardware bug or undocumented feature, then the software is very likely to break the first time it's run on an emulator that does not share this bug or feature. Here's a real case in point: On the emulator I wrote, we had a third party vendor who had a major application. At one point in the application, the program ran off the end of executable code and into a data area, executing the random data as instructions until it eventually ran into real code again. As luck would have it, no disaster resulted. Otherwise, the vendor would have found out about the bug and fixed it. Our emulator reacted differently to this random data due to the presense of a large number of undefined opcodes. This caused the application to crash. Asking a third-party vendor to fix an application which ran just fine on the real computer was out of the question. Thus, we had to isolate every one of those undefined opcodes, find out what they did on the real hardware, and emulate the behavior correctly. Actually, I won't swear that we got it all correct -- we just debugged it until it worked. Every time we thought the emulator was perfected, we found a new application that tickled some previously-undiscovered undocumented behavior. Timing is another problem. I've heard that there was an early version of a PDP-10 emulator that was failing under Tops-10 because emulated disk I/O was happening too fast. I'm currently working with an emulator for a heavily pipelined architecture. Beilieve me, getting all the timings right is a bear. Bottom line: writing a working emulator is non-trivial and a bastard to support. -- -ed falk, falk@falconer.vip.best.com. See *********************#*************#* http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!**** and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#** to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW**** ###### From: ab528@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Heinz W. Wiggeshoff) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 3 May 2000 20:46:25 GMT Organization: The National Capital FreeNet Lines: 17 Message-ID: <8eq371$3hq$1@freenet9.carleton.ca> References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> Reply-To: ab528@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Heinz W. Wiggeshoff) NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet10 X-Trace: freenet9.carleton.ca 957386785 3642 134.117.136.30 (3 May 2000 20:46:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: complaints@ncf.ca NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 May 2000 20:46:25 GMT X-Given-Sender: ab528@freenet10.carleton.ca (Heinz W. Wiggeshoff) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newscore.univie.ac.at!newsfeed.Austria.EU.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!npeer.kpnqwest.net!EU.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!nntp.gctr.net!xcski.com!freenet-news!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!ab528 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55371 Edward A. Falk (falconer@best.com) writes: > ... > Further, you also need to correctly emulate the bugs and undocumented > features. This sounds inane, but it's true. That outlines the beauty of the IBM System 360 et al design philosophy: the various branches could build the hardware any way they chose, but the Principles of Operation manual was the _bible_. (Eg. 3nnn versus 4nnn series.) Similarly, the design of PL/I left no doubt as to what constitutes a valid program versus trick programming using UNSPECified features. But humans, being what they are, came up with imprecise exceptions, followed by multiple imprecise exceptions, apparently tossed the SIO instruction (hardware), AND, (if I heard right) allows pointer arith- metic in PL/I v 2! ###### Message-ID: <39105E1C.6DC3E519@trailing-edge.com> Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 17:13:01 -0400 From: Tim Shoppa Organization: Trailing Edge Technology X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.03Gold (X11; I; OpenVMS V7.0 DEC 3000 Model 300L) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 35 NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.73.218.130 X-Trace: reader3.news.uu.net 957388382 7565 63.73.218.130 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.enteract.com!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!spool0.news.uu.net!reader3.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55365 Edward A. Falk wrote: > Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to get the > documentation. Actually, it's not that bad. Eric Smith has several of the relevant manuals online at http://www.36bit.org/dec/manual/ , most notably the "DECsystem-10/DECSYSTEM-20 Processor Reference Manual". This is a big win. The fact that the CPU spec is over 500 pages means that it is a lot harder than many of the microcomputers commonly emulated. > Writing an emulator for a CPU is actually quite easy. It's complicated for at least some of the PDP-10's by the presence of loadable microcode. > Further, you also need to correctly emulate the bugs and undocumented > features. This sounds inane, but it's true. Even more complicated for the PDP-10's with loadable microcode because most of the microcode versions have subtle bugs, some of which are used by the software to identify the CPU type :-). > But it's > only a tiny fraction of the job. Writing emulators for the > peripherals also needs to be done, and this can seriously complicate > matters. Absolutely. If you look at the TOPS-10 and -20 sources you can see that many times the OS writers and the peripheral hardware designers didn't agree as to how things are supposed to work. And these are guys who (at least nominally) were supposed to be working together! Tim. ###### Message-ID: <3910AAEA.466D811D@jetnet.ab.ca> Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 16:40:42 -0600 From: Ben Franchuk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i486) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39105E1C.6DC3E519@trailing-edge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.153.6.40 X-Trace: 3 May 2000 17:33:42 -0700, 207.153.6.40 Organization: OA Internet Lines: 39 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!skynet.be!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.oanet.com!207.153.6.40 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55336 Tim Shoppa wrote: > > Edward A. Falk wrote: > > Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to get the > > documentation. > > Actually, it's not that bad. Eric Smith has several of the relevant > manuals online at http://www.36bit.org/dec/manual/ , most > notably the "DECsystem-10/DECSYSTEM-20 Processor Reference > Manual". This is a big win. > > The fact that the CPU spec is over 500 pages means that it is a lot > harder than many of the microcomputers commonly emulated. > > > Writing an emulator for a CPU is actually quite easy. > > It's complicated for at least some of the PDP-10's by the presence > of loadable microcode. > > > Further, you also need to correctly emulate the bugs and undocumented > > features. This sounds inane, but it's true. > > Even more complicated for the PDP-10's with loadable microcode because > most of the microcode versions have subtle bugs, some of which are > used by the software to identify the CPU type :-). > > > But it's > > only a tiny fraction of the job. Writing emulators for the > > peripherals also needs to be done, and this can seriously complicate > > matters. > While slower, would not writing a emulator, for the emulator work if that does not violate copy writes of the microcode? Ben. -- "We do not inherit our time on this planet from our parents... We borrow it from our children." "Ancient Logic" http://www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/al/index.html ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> Organization: D Bit, Troy, NY From: wilson@dbit.com (John Wilson) NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com Message-ID: <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> Date: 3 May 2000 21:23:35 -0400 X-Trace: 3 May 2000 21:23:35 -0400, dbit.dbit.com Lines: 53 XPident: wilson X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.181.141.3 XPident: news Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!netnews.globalip.ch!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!colt.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!newsfeed.wizvax.net!news.wizvax.net!dbit.com!wilson Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55339 In article <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com>, Edward A. Falk wrote: >Timing is another problem. I've heard that there was an early >version of a PDP-10 emulator that was failing under Tops-10 because >emulated disk I/O was happening too fast. IIRC, this was a spot in ITS (in DSKDMP I think?) under KLH's KS10 emulator (I heard about it but didn't see it), where it would start a disk I/O transfer using a buffer which included the code currently being executed, and then it would jump out of the way before the disk had a chance to start DMAing stuff in. But on an emulator, the easiest way to emulate disk I/O is to suspend instruction execution do the entire I/O "instantaneously" between instructions, so it would fill the whole buffer before the next instruction was fetched. Since it worked fine on real KS10s, this bug is the emulator's problem, just like the thing you described with executing random data and living to tell about it. I had similar problems with my PDP-11 emulator, and worked around them by putting in a queueing system so that most operations of most devices can be delayed by a configurable # of instruction fetches before that operation is begun (at which point it still may happen in a flash, if it's to a file or device that's accessed using blocking I/O). It's a big pain but this makes it possible to address the actual problem, that the user code assumes it can always finish the last N instructions before a particular spot, before there's any possibility that the device will have completed (or even begun) the operation. Anyway, although I've never finished a KS10 emulator, I've done plenty of work on one and I really think that the instruction set *is* the main concern. It's freakin' huge!!! The paging and UMR and interrupt systems have to be done right too, but they aren't all *that* complicated, at least on the KS. Some of the devices will be tricky, especially the TU77 since the TM03 documentation is so full of nasty little omissions etc., but generally the device support in the OSes for the KS10 is terrible so there just aren't that many devices to worry about in the first place. Do a TU77 and an RP06 and a DZ and you're practically there! The KS10 OSes don't support many of the other zillions of older PDP-11 disk/tape devices that *would* have worked (the RK611 even has an 18-bit mode, and the RK11D can be ECOed into an RK11E too), so you can skip all of those, and the KS10 didn't live long enough to really overlap with the newer PDP-11/VAX stuff (no MSCP at all, and no DELUA, the DEUNA was around but drew too much current to actually install one). So you're off the hook for all that stuff too. AFAIK no serial mux besides the DZ11 was ever officially supported on the KS10 (which is ironic because the KS10 CPU's backplane is actually made from a DH11 PCB with different wire wrap!), there was the DUP11/KMC11 set that was used for sync serial I/O but you're probably not going to get much call for that on a Unix or Windows based emulator. The DZ is dead easy, so really, serial I/O is no biggie either. John Wilson D Bit ###### From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 4 May 2000 01:40:07 GMT Organization: TSS Inc. Lines: 13 Message-ID: <8eqkdn$2v82$1@citadel.in.taronga.com> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: citadel.in.taronga.com X-Trace: citadel.in.taronga.com 957404407 97538 10.0.0.43 (4 May 2000 01:40:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@taronga.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 May 2000 01:40:07 GMT X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-proxy.baileynm.com!citadel.in.taronga.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55384 In article <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com>, Edward A. Falk wrote: >Further, you also need to correctly emulate the bugs and undocumented >features. This sounds inane, but it's true. That's true even for silly things like terminal emulators. There's a long history of problems with vt100 emulations, for example. -- This is The Reverend Peter da Silva's Boring Sig File - there are no references to Wolves, Kibo, Discordianism, or The Church of the Subgenius in this document Executive Vice President, Corporate Communications, Entropy Gradient Reversals. ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> Organization: a user of Best Internet Communications, Inc. www.best.com From: falconer@best.com (Edward A. Falk) Date: 04 May 2000 02:00:43 GMT Lines: 36 Message-ID: <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ba.best.com X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 957405643 223 falconer@206.184.139.134 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!enews.sgi.com!nntp.flash.net!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news2.best.com!news3.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55347 In article <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net>, John Wilson wrote: >In article <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com>, >Edward A. Falk wrote: >>Timing is another problem. I've heard that there was an early >>version of a PDP-10 emulator that was failing under Tops-10 because >>emulated disk I/O was happening too fast. > >IIRC, this was a spot in ITS (in DSKDMP I think?) under KLH's KS10 emulator >(I heard about it but didn't see it), where it would start a disk I/O >transfer using a buffer which included the code currently being executed, >and then it would jump out of the way before the disk had a chance to start >DMAing stuff in. But on an emulator, the easiest way to emulate disk I/O >is to suspend instruction execution do the entire I/O "instantaneously" >between instructions, so it would fill the whole buffer before the next >instruction was fetched. Ahhhh, *that* was it. Now I remember. >Anyway, although I've never finished a KS10 emulator, I've done plenty of work >on one and I really think that the instruction set *is* the main concern. >It's freakin' huge!!! Yes, but very modular. >Some of the devices will be tricky, especially the TU77 since the TM03 >documentation is so full of nasty little omissions etc., ... I think writing all the device emulators is where it gets really ugly. -- -ed falk, falk@falconer.vip.best.com. See *********************#*************#* http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!**** and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#** to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW**** ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39105E1C.6DC3E519@trailing-edge.com> Organization: a user of Best Internet Communications, Inc. www.best.com From: falconer@best.com (Edward A. Falk) Date: 04 May 2000 02:07:31 GMT Lines: 48 Message-ID: <3910db63$0$204@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ba.best.com X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 957406051 204 falconer@206.184.139.134 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.best.com!news3.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55346 In article <39105E1C.6DC3E519@trailing-edge.com>, Tim Shoppa wrote: >Edward A. Falk wrote: >> Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to get the >> documentation. > >Actually, it's not that bad. Eric Smith has several of the relevant >manuals online at http://www.36bit.org/dec/manual/ , most >notably the "DECsystem-10/DECSYSTEM-20 Processor Reference >Manual". This is a big win. Egads. Scanned images of pages. Yikes. Still, it's a huge win. This must have been added since the last time I browsed the 36bit.org homepage. Does it include peripheral documentation? >It's complicated for at least some of the PDP-10's by the presence >of loadable microcode. Ouch. >Even more complicated for the PDP-10's with loadable microcode because >most of the microcode versions have subtle bugs, some of which are >used by the software to identify the CPU type :-). Double ouch. I remember the pdp-10's in the old MIT AI lab. The hackers in the lab had extended the instruction sets of some of the machines. They had a programming contest once (I think it was factoring huge numbers or looking for Mersenne primes or some such) and someone asked if they could use microcode in the contest. The answer was something like "no -- what next; allow wire-wrap?" I don't suppose emulating the KL-Udge would be a good idea either. -- -ed falk, falk@falconer.vip.best.com. See *********************#*************#* http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!**** and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#** to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW**** ###### From: "Henry W. Miller" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 00:44:36 -0700 Lines: 103 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4029.2901 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4029.2901 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.126.149.196 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.126.149.196 Message-ID: <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> X-Trace: 4 May 2000 02:44:26 -0600, 216.126.149.196 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.enteract.com!chicago-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news2.starnetinc.com!216.126.149.196 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55350 "Edward A. Falk" wrote in message news:39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com... > In article <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com>, > Dave G. wrote: > >Sorry for being obtuse, but what are the big problems emulating the PDP-10 > >(lack of documentation, transferring the original software, copyrights, or > >maybe just the scale of the endeavour)? I missed the beginning of this > >thread and this is all a bit before my time. > Ed, > Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to get the > documentation. But there's more to the equation. > > Having written an emulator once, I have a couple comments to make. > > Writing an emulator for a CPU is actually quite easy. But it's > only a tiny fraction of the job. Writing emulators for the > peripherals also needs to be done, and this can seriously complicate > matters. > > Further, you also need to correctly emulate the bugs and undocumented > features. This sounds inane, but it's true. > I have TONS of old documentation, much to my wife's chagrin. As soon as I get my scanner up and running, this is one of my goals: scan all of that old stuff into a human/machine readable format. This is going to have to be a low priority item, but hopefully it'll happen. When it does, and as soon as I can get a new ANONYMOUS FTP account set up, or possibly WEBify it, I'll make it available. > When people write code for a specific computer, they don't debug > until the code works according to the specifications of the underlying > hardware, they just debug until it works. If it happens that > they've stumbled across a hardware bug or undocumented feature, > then the software is very likely to break the first time it's run > on an emulator that does not share this bug or feature. > > Here's a real case in point: On the emulator I wrote, we had a > third party vendor who had a major application. At one point in > the application, the program ran off the end of executable code > and into a data area, executing the random data as instructions > until it eventually ran into real code again. As luck would have > it, no disaster resulted. Otherwise, the vendor would have found > out about the bug and fixed it. > > Our emulator reacted differently to this random data due to the > presense of a large number of undefined opcodes. This caused the > application to crash. Asking a third-party vendor to fix an > application which ran just fine on the real computer was out of > the question. Thus, we had to isolate every one of those undefined > opcodes, find out what they did on the real hardware, and emulate > the behavior correctly. Actually, I won't swear that we got it > all correct -- we just debugged it until it worked. > Here's another fun point, although it's a software issue: when I was doing the TCP/IP for TENEX close to 20 years or so ago, I found out that many versions of TENEX had different JSYS values for certain calls. Try to get people to get consistent! It made it really difficult to try to put out a unified release for people, without requiring the host system programmer to perform some hacking, other than the usual tweaking of values in STORAGE/STG. > Every time we thought the emulator was perfected, we found a new > application that tickled some previously-undiscovered undocumented > behavior. > > Timing is another problem. I've heard that there was an early > version of a PDP-10 emulator that was failing under Tops-10 because > emulated disk I/O was happening too fast. > As I recall the folklore, the Amdahl 470 had the same problem, as it ran too fast and thus broke some of the carefully defined timing loops in OS/360. > I'm currently working with an emulator for a heavily pipelined > architecture. Beilieve me, getting all the timings right is a > bear. > > Bottom line: writing a working emulator is non-trivial and a > bastard to support. > > -- > -ed falk, falk@falconer.vip.best.com. See *********************#*************#* > http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!**** > and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#** > to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW**** -HWM ###### From: "George R. Gonzalez" Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 10:46:40 -0500 Organization: University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus Lines: 34 Message-ID: <8es6ni$s4b$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <8eq371$3hq$1@freenet9.carleton.ca> X-Trace: laurel.tc.umn.edu 957455922 28811 134.84.134.102 (4 May 2000 15:58:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@laurel.tc.umn.edu X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!skynet.be!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!upp1.onvoy!msc1.onvoy!onvoy.com!hardy.tc.umn.edu!laurel.tc.umn.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55361 Heinz W. Wiggeshoff wrote in message <8eq371$3hq$1@freenet9.carleton.ca>... >Edward A. Falk (falconer@best.com) writes: >> >... >> Further, you also need to correctly emulate the bugs and undocumented >> features. This sounds inane, but it's true. IBM learned this the hard way with the 7090 series, as programmers figured out lots of undocumented tricks, like you could specify two index registers at once in the index register bitmap, and you'd get the OR of the two. This caused problems when the 7094 design changed the bitmap to an encoded field. All of a sudden you didnt get the OR of index register 1 and 2, but got register 3. Or on the PDP-8, what happened when you accessed non-existent memory wasnt ever specified. Each model did something a little different-- I dimly recall the original -8 did something really weird, like instead of executing the next instruction, it would skip it and execute whatever was at word zero, or what was in the AC register. Definitely a bug IMHO. It's nice to have all these boundary conditions pinned down tightly. One of the big headaches in writing a VT-100 emulator was that the specs only (vaguely) documented in-bounds behavior, but it was important to be able to handle "scroll -29 lines" and other unusual combinations, as many screen editors used and depended on the quirks. ###### From: jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx (Jay Maynard) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <8eq371$3hq$1@freenet9.carleton.ca> <8es6ni$s4b$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> Reply-To: jmaynard@texas.net Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.4 (UNIX) Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 11:57:10 CDT Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv2-RcwzTxqmnKf6I8OHaM0HG1VPuW4QXWb4sILaBAGWC4OWdFYHVQQ6Xgo7u4ojm0dLKxjbIXG0oDm/INL!zxwS/013/mPIxTd0jcppbw== X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 16:57:10 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!skynet.be!europa.netcrusader.net!207.172.3.37!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.giganews.com!news5.giganews.com.POSTED!jmaynard Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55337 On Thu, 4 May 2000 10:46:40 -0500, George R. Gonzalez wrote: >IBM learned this the hard way with the 7090 series, as programmers figured >out lots of undocumented tricks, like you could specify two index registers >at once in the index register bitmap, and you'd get the OR of the two. This >caused problems when the 7094 design changed the bitmap to an encoded field. >All of a sudden you didnt get the OR of index register 1 and 2, but got >register 3. This must be why the S/3x0 POO has comments everywhere you look about being sure not to depend on the values in reserved fields on output, and setting them to zero on input, for compatibility with future systems. IBM did indeed learn that lesson. ###### From: allen.baum@compaq.com (Allen J. Baum) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 10:18:18 -0700 Organization: Compaq Computer Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: althea.pa.dec.com X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsgate.tandem.com!mailint03.im.hou.compaq.com!pa.dec.com!src.dec.com!allen.baum Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55394 Allegedly, the fastest PDP-10/Decsystem-20 ever built was a custom one that was given to Bill Gates at a Decus event 3 or 4 years ago. It was an Alpha running Bob Supnik's emulator, with an I/O device which was a real PDP-10 front panel that they'd dug out of a warehouse. -- ********************************************** * Allen J. Baum tel. (650)853-6626 * * Compaq Computer Corp. fax (650)853-6513 * * 181 Lytton Ave. * * Palo Alto, CA 95306 abaum@pa.dec.com * ********************************************** ###### Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!not-for-mail From: Neil Franklin Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 04 May 2000 21:46:15 +0200 Organization: My own Private Self Lines: 19 Message-ID: <6uwvlagku0.fsf@chonsp.franklin.ch> References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: chonsp.franklin.ch X-Trace: chonsp.franklin.ch 957469578 506 10.0.3.2 (4 May 2000 19:46:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@chonsp.franklin.ch NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 May 2000 19:46:18 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55408 "Henry W. Miller" writes: > When it > does, > and as soon as I can get a new ANONYMOUS FTP account set up, > or possibly WEBify it, I'll make it available. Or: get an Web account (easier to get than FTP Accounts) and then just put the raw ascii files in there (saving the work of webifying). As much as it may surprise in todays age of styling-overdesigned web sites, web servers can export an raw directory full of ascii files! -- Neil Franklin, neil@franklin.ch.remove http://neil.franklin.ch/ Nerd, Geek, Hacker, Unix Guru, Sysadmin, Roleplayer, LARPer, Mystic Use a WIMP (Windows Icons Mouse Pulldowns) interface - or get one with a CLUE (Command Line User Environment)? ###### From: jmfbahciv@aol.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Fri, 05 May 00 11:27:29 GMT Organization: UltraNet Communications, Inc. Lines: 57 Message-ID: <8eukqj$n46$12@bob.news.rcn.net> References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39105E1C.6DC3E519@trailing-edge.com> X-Trace: bn5metIXsrFu0op83dGJ49a3f2ggbfUF2Z/OIlZkqBQ= X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 May 2000 14:11:31 GMT X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!216-164-247-145 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55447 In article <39105E1C.6DC3E519@trailing-edge.com>, Tim Shoppa wrote: >Edward A. Falk wrote: >> Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to get the >> documentation. > >Actually, it's not that bad. Eric Smith has several of the relevant >manuals online at http://www.36bit.org/dec/manual/ , most >notably the "DECsystem-10/DECSYSTEM-20 Processor Reference >Manual". This is a big win. > >The fact that the CPU spec is over 500 pages means that it is a lot >harder than many of the microcomputers commonly emulated. Did he get the source for that manual? Or did he scan it in? > >> Writing an emulator for a CPU is actually quite easy. > >It's complicated for at least some of the PDP-10's by the presence >of loadable microcode. One should also note that a problem in the hardware breadboard might get a workaround done in the microcode, with the full intention of "fixing" it in the "right" place when the initial project is done. Of course that never happens. IIRC, a number of problems that would have been ECOed ended up getting fixed in the microcode. It's cheaper from the hardware engineering budget's point of view. >> Further, you also need to correctly emulate the bugs and undocumented >> features. This sounds inane, but it's true. > >Even more complicated for the PDP-10's with loadable microcode because >most of the microcode versions have subtle bugs, some of which are >used by the software to identify the CPU type :-). Dem's not bugs; dem's asspects. > >> But it's >> only a tiny fraction of the job. Writing emulators for the >> peripherals also needs to be done, and this can seriously complicate >> matters. > >Absolutely. If you look at the TOPS-10 and -20 sources you can see >that many times the OS writers and the peripheral hardware designers >didn't agree as to how things are supposed to work. And these are >guys who (at least nominally) were supposed to be working together! They were? [very sarcastic emoticon here] /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail. ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> Organization: D Bit, Troy, NY From: wilson@dbit.com (John Wilson) NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com Message-ID: <3911df7b_1@news.wizvax.net> Date: 4 May 2000 16:37:15 -0400 X-Trace: 4 May 2000 16:37:15 -0400, dbit.dbit.com Lines: 21 XPident: wilson X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.181.141.3 XPident: news Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!newsfeed.rhein-neckar.de!news.rhein-neckar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!blackbush.xlink.net!newscore.gigabell.net!newsfeed.icl.net!colt.net!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!newsfeed.wizvax.net!news.wizvax.net!dbit.com!wilson Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55425 In article <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com>, Edward A. Falk wrote: >>Some of the devices will be tricky, especially the TU77 since the TM03 >>documentation is so full of nasty little omissions etc., ... > >I think writing all the device emulators is where it gets really >ugly. Well it's no picnic but it's not the end of the world. In my PDP-11 emulator, the TU77 (etc.) emulation is just 1132 lines of heavily commented assembly language, I'm sure it would be a fraction of that in typical uncommented synchronous C code with no error checking (let's be realistic here!!). It sticks on to the device-independent tape drivers and RH emulation code but those don't amount to much, and the RH stuff is shared with the RM/RP. IMHO the TU77 is the most difficult to emulate of the common KS10 devices, the RM03 and RP06 are really pretty easy and the DZ11 is very simple. The CTY/KLINIK stuff done by the 8080A shouldn't be all that bad either. John Wilson D Bit ###### From: Dennis Ritchie Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 02:19:20 +0000 Organization: Bell Labs / Lucent Technologies Lines: 30 Message-ID: <39122FA8.264D9C1D@bell-labs.com> References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <8eq371$3hq$1@freenet9.carleton.ca> <8es6ni$s4b$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: trux.cs.bell-labs.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!newshunter!esel!cosy.sbg.ac.at!news-hog.berkeley.edu!onodera-news!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!207.24.196.41!nntphub.cb.lucent.com!news Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55421 "George R. Gonzalez" wrote (about having to preserve undocumented CPU "features": > IBM learned this the hard way with the 7090 series, as programmers figured > out lots of undocumented tricks, like you could specify two index registers > at once in the index register bitmap, and you'd get the OR of the two. This > caused problems when the 7094 design changed the bitmap to an encoded field. > All of a sudden you didnt get the OR of index register 1 and 2, but got > register 3. It would be interesting to know the real history of this, from the 701 through 704. By the 709, likewise 7090, it was well-documented that the 3-bit index register field specified OR of the bit-selected registers. Gonzalez is wrong, though, about the 7094. It did have 7 index registers, but there was an explicit mode whereby either a unique one of the 7 registers was selected, or the 7090 and predecessors' behavior was followed (LMTM/EMTM instructions). Applications could choose; the boot-up state was the older behavior. But more generally he's doubtless correct that this series didn't fully decode instructions and that "discovered" behavior was taken advantage of. At least in early folklore, the STZ (store 0) instruction just sort of happened and was not described originally. Dennis ##### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers From: ehrice@his.com (Edward Rice) Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Message-ID: Organization: NDS Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 02:53:04 -0400 References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <8eq371$3hq$1@freenet9.carleton.ca> <8es6ni$s4b$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm9-169.his.com X-Trace: 5 May 2000 02:52:55 -0400, pm9-169.his.com Lines: 34 X-Authenticated-User: ehrice Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!news.datacomm.ch!newscore.gigabell.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!diablo.theplanet.net!europa.netcrusader.net!208.184.7.66!triton.skycache.com!192.168.1.3!news1.his.com!user Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55478 In article <8es6ni$s4b$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu>, "George R. Gonzalez" wrote: > IBM learned this the hard way with the 7090 series, as programmers figured > out lots of undocumented tricks, like you could specify two index registers > at once in the index register bitmap, and you'd get the OR of the two. This > caused problems when the 7094 design changed the bitmap to an encoded field. > All of a sudden you didnt get the OR of index register 1 and 2, but got > register 3. Ummm... this is perfectly nicely documented in the Principles of Operation manual under "Multiple Tag Mode." This was designed in, so that you could put the base of a table in one index register and the offset from the base in another, and a tag that referred to the sum of the two index numbers would give an index amount that was the sum of the contents of the two registers. The 7094 provided backward compatibility with the "3 means 2 + 1" mode (enter multiple tag mode) and also the ability to address seven discrete index registers (leave multiple tag mode). > It's nice to have all these boundary conditions pinned down tightly. > One of the big headaches in writing a VT-100 emulator was that > the specs only (vaguely) documented in-bounds behavior, > but it was important to be able to handle "scroll -29 lines" and other > unusual combinations, as many screen editors used and depended on the > quirks. Agreed that dealing with quirks is important. I wrote enough code to deal with them -- and full-screen CRT management was probably the biggest area. ###### From: Gordon Greene Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 5 May 2000 09:16:04 -0500 Organization: Newscene Public Access Usenet News Service (http://www.newscene.com/) Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.30.1784 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!join.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!novia!sequencer.newscene.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55480 In article , allen.baum@compaq.com says... > Allegedly, the fastest PDP-10/Decsystem-20 ever built was a custom one that was given > to Bill Gates at a Decus event 3 or 4 years ago. > But why give it to the Prince of Darkness? There must be someone more worthy of it. Bob Supnik springs to mind... ###### From: jmfbahciv@aol.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Sat, 06 May 00 07:46:08 GMT Organization: UltraNet Communications, Inc. Lines: 18 Message-ID: <8f0s7s$epp$2@bob.news.rcn.net> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> X-Trace: YbShD0j7jDvMx1ub7c1Lm6VPi1zFca8Zkwsz4caqGi8= X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 May 2000 10:30:20 GMT X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!207-172-102-112 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55522 In article , "Terry C. Shannon" wrote: > >> In alt.folklore.computers Gordon Greene wrote: >> > But why give it to the Prince of Darkness? There must be someone more >> > worthy of it. Bob Supnik springs to mind... > >I dunno... I think Bob is pretty happy with his StrongARM-based Itsy pocket >PCs. > >That said, it was ludicrous for DEC to go to Redmond bearing gifts. Look >what it got them! Never underestimate people who are Gates-wanna-bes. /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail. ###### From: "George R. Gonzalez" Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 16:44:14 -0500 Organization: University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus Lines: 31 Message-ID: <8evg24$ebj$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <8eq371$3hq$1@freenet9.carleton.ca> <8es6ni$s4b$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> <39122FA8.264D9C1D@bell-labs.com> X-Trace: laurel.tc.umn.edu 957563780 14707 134.84.134.102 (5 May 2000 21:56:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@laurel.tc.umn.edu X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!skynet.be!europa.netcrusader.net!192.148.253.68!netnews.com!upp1.onvoy!msc1.onvoy!onvoy.com!hardy.tc.umn.edu!laurel.tc.umn.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55525 Dennis Ritchie wrote in message <39122FA8.264D9C1D@bell-labs.com>... > >Gonzalez is wrong, though, about the 7094. It did have 7 index registers, >but there was an explicit mode whereby either a unique one of the 7 registers >was selected, or the 7090 and predecessors' behavior >was followed (LMTM/EMTM instructions). Applications could choose; >the boot-up state was the older behavior. Thanks for the correction-- my info was second-hand. That compatibility mode bit sounds like a major pain-- every library routine and interrupt handler would have to worry about saving, changing, then restoring the setting. In the PC world we have a similar problem with the "direction flag" and the extended registers (FS, GS, upper 16 bits of the 32-bit registers). I can't begin to estimate the subtle bugs caused by one routine assuming it has exclusive control over one of these. I once spent about 2 weeks finding a random crashing bug where sometimes the PC's divide or mod instruction would seem to fail. It turns out an interrupt handler was destroying the upper 16 bits of AX and DX, which was never a problem in this old 16-bit program, except inside a critical section of the 32-bit divide routine. ###### From: Alistair@caribsurf.com (Alistair Gale) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 5 May 2000 21:47:36 GMT Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> Reply-To: alistair@caribsurf.com NNTP-Posting-Host: p-219.newsdawg.com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!newsfeed.rhein-neckar.de!news.rhein-neckar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!blackbush.xlink.net!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!enews.sgi.com!pln-w!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!Alistair Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55509 On 5 May 2000 09:16:04 -0500, Gordon Greene wrote: >In article , >allen.baum@compaq.com says... >> Allegedly, the fastest PDP-10/Decsystem-20 ever built was a custom one that was given >> to Bill Gates at a Decus event 3 or 4 years ago. >> >But why give it to the Prince of Darkness? There must be someone more >worthy of it. Bob Supnik springs to mind... > Didn't he get kicked out of Harvard for stealing computer time on one of these systems? -- alistair This is the sort of English up with which I will not put. -- Winston Churchill ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: Terry Kennedy Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@spc.edu if this posting is inappropriate User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (BSD/OS/4.1 (i386)) NNTP-Posting-Host: gate.tmk.com Organization: St. Peter's College, US Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> X-Trace: spcuna.spc.edu 957573334 2104 terry [204.141.35.61] Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 00:35:35 GMT Lines: 20 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.new-york.net!news.spc.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55493 In alt.folklore.computers Gordon Greene wrote: > But why give it to the Prince of Darkness? There must be someone more > worthy of it. Bob Supnik springs to mind... Microsoft was a very large user of the hardware in their early days. The Gates/Allen/Davidoff Microsoft BASIC interpreter, the BASIC compiler (BASCOM) and the Woods Microsoft Fortran compiler were all written and maintained on that hardware. There was an in-house assembler which did not use standard Intel 8080 mnemonics, and which had rather extensive macro capabilities (the BASIC interpreter and compiler shared much of the same source, with the selection of a macro library controlling which of the two got produced). At a source-license customer for the interpreter, I had the task of defining a new macro library for Digital Research's macro assembler to allow the oddball source to be compiled natively under CP/M prior to the customer integrating their unique additions to the interpreter. Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com terry@tmk.com Jersey City, NJ USA ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: "Terry C. Shannon" Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 01:30:18 GMT X-Msmail-Priority: Normal References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp0a110.std.com Organization: Shannon Knows Compaq X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Lines: 20 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!nntp-out.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!world!news Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55489 > In alt.folklore.computers Gordon Greene wrote: > > But why give it to the Prince of Darkness? There must be someone more > > worthy of it. Bob Supnik springs to mind... I dunno... I think Bob is pretty happy with his StrongARM-based Itsy pocket PCs. That said, it was ludicrous for DEC to go to Redmond bearing gifts. Look what it got them! cheers, terry s Q: What do you call a Microsoft Business Partner? A: An Organ Donor. ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers From: ehrice@his.com (Edward Rice) Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Message-ID: Organization: NDS Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 01:17:35 -0400 References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <8eq371$3hq$1@freenet9.carleton.ca> <8es6ni$s4b$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> <39122FA8.264D9C1D@bell-labs.com> <8evg24$ebj$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm9-163.his.com X-Trace: 6 May 2000 01:17:22 -0400, pm9-163.his.com Lines: 21 X-Authenticated-User: ehrice Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!news.datacomm.ch!newscore.gigabell.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.icl.net!triton.skycache.com!192.168.1.3!news1.his.com!user Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55501 In article <8evg24$ebj$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu>, "George R. Gonzalez" wrote: > That compatibility mode bit sounds like a major pain-- every library routine > and > interrupt handler would have to worry about saving, changing, then restoring > the setting. Let's see if I can get in before dmr this time... Library routines didn't have to worry about this -- they could be coded simply with index registers 1, 2, and 4, and would operate just fine in either mode. It was only 3, 5, 6 and 7 that behaved differently depending on the mode. And standard libraries didn't need to deal with tables much, anyway. (And besides, on a machine that permitted self-modifying code, it was pretty standard to stuff the table address into the indexed instruction making the reference, which was faster anyway.) ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> Organization: a user of Best Internet Communications, Inc. www.best.com From: falconer@best.com (Edward A. Falk) Date: 08 May 2000 21:44:47 GMT Lines: 33 Message-ID: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ba.best.com X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 957822287 221 falconer@206.184.139.134 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.best.com!news3.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55682 In article <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com>, Henry W. Miller wrote: > >"Edward A. Falk" wrote in message >news:39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com... > >Ed, > >> Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to get the >> documentation. But there's more to the equation. >> > I have TONS of old documentation, much to my wife's chagrin. As I know what you mean. My hallway is full of boxes of SunOS 4 documentation. >soon as I get my scanner up and running, this is one of my goals: scan >all of that old stuff into a human/machine readable format. This is going >to have to be a low priority item, but hopefully it'll happen. When it >does, >and as soon as I can get a new ANONYMOUS FTP account set up, >or possibly WEBify it, I'll make it available. Unfortunately, we're back to something that exists, but we can't get it. -- -ed falk, falk@falconer.vip.best.com. See *********************#*************#* http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!**** and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#** to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW**** ###### From: jmfbahciv@aol.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Wed, 10 May 00 08:04:30 GMT Organization: UltraNet Communications, Inc. Lines: 40 Message-ID: <8fberg$51i$1@bob.news.rcn.net> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> X-Trace: 9hIEUFAr5XDvJ5WhGPDODk6y7Pps6Ojj6aXBtQIpBwo= X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 May 2000 10:49:20 GMT X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!netnews.com!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!207-172-97-191 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55791 In article , alderson@netcom2.netcom.com (Richard M. Alderson III) wrote: >In article >allen.baum@compaq.com (Allen J. Baum) writes: > >> Allegedly, the fastest PDP-10/Decsystem-20 ever built >>was a custom one that >> was given to Bill Gates at a Decus event 3 or 4 years ago. > >Robert Palmer and Bill Gates were co-keynote speakers. >Palmer made the presentation. The system refused to boot, >right there on stage (after working perfectly in dress rehearsal). Even -10 emulators know for sure. > >> It was an Alpha running Bob Supnik's emulator, with an >>I/O device which was a >> real PDP-10 front panel that they'd dug out of a warehouse. > >It was an Alpha running *Ken Harrenstein's* emulator, >which Digital was at that >time touting to the fast-fading 36-bit crowd as a way to >migrate onto the Alpha platform. I can't believe that they were still doing that. It's obvious that Digital was never serious about that flavor of migration. If they were, they would have put the experts on the project. It's just an example of idiots. >Bob Supnik's emulators are good, but none of them are 36-bit: He >did the PDP-1, the -4/7/9/15, the -8/12 (I think), and the DG Nova (!). > >Right after Gates got his Alpha, Paul Allen bought a Toad-1 System... I met a Toad once. It felt like it ran real smooth, although I didn't use TOPS-20 to the extent that I used TOPS-10. /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail. ###### From: alderson@netcom2.netcom.com (Richard M. Alderson III) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 09 May 2000 22:09:47 GMT Organization: NETCOM On-line services Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> Reply-To: alderson@netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.66 X-Server-Date: 9 May 2000 22:10:06 GMT In-reply-to: allen.baum@compaq.com's message of Thu, 04 May 2000 10:18:18 -0700 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!firehose.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!alderson Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55842 In article allen.baum@compaq.com (Allen J. Baum) writes: > Allegedly, the fastest PDP-10/Decsystem-20 ever built was a custom one that > was given to Bill Gates at a Decus event 3 or 4 years ago. Robert Palmer and Bill Gates were co-keynote speakers. Palmer made the presentation. The system refused to boot, right there on stage (after working perfectly in dress rehearsal). > It was an Alpha running Bob Supnik's emulator, with an I/O device which was a > real PDP-10 front panel that they'd dug out of a warehouse. It was an Alpha running *Ken Harrenstein's* emulator, which Digital was at that time touting to the fast-fading 36-bit crowd as a way to migrate onto the Alpha platform. Bob Supnik's emulators are good, but none of them are 36-bit: He did the PDP-1, the -4/7/9/15, the -8/12 (I think), and the DG Nova (!). Right after Gates got his Alpha, Paul Allen bought a Toad-1 System... Rich Alderson Last LOTS Tops-20 Systems Programmer, 1984-1991 Current maintainer, MIT TECO EMACS (v. 170) Customer Advocacy, XKL LLC, 1993-2000 last name @ XKL dot COM Chief systems administrator, XKL LLC, 1998-now ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> Organization: Chez Inwap From: inwap@best.com (Joe Smith) Date: 10 May 2000 06:00:48 GMT Lines: 35 Message-ID: <3918fb10$0$222@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ba.best.com X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 957938448 222 inwap@206.184.139.134 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.best.com!news3.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:55787 In article , Richard M. Alderson III wrote: >Right after Gates got his Alpha, Paul Allen bought a Toad-1 System... I'm glad to see that said system is still in operation. telnet xkleten.paulallen.com Trying 204.202.80.66... Connected to xkleten.paulallen.com. Escape character is '^]'. XKLeTen - Tops20 for the Wired World, TOPS-20 Monitor 7(102400)-1 @log jms Password: Job 8 on TTY26 20-Jan-2000 10:56PM Previous LOGIN: 4-May-99 5:04AM XKLeTen@ dir PS: FOO.DAT.2 INDEX.CGI.1 LSF.PL.4 LSF-COMP.PL.2 TEST.DU.3 .LSF.1 Total of 34 pages in 6 files XKLeTen@ kk Hmmm. My guess is that someone forgot to reset the clock after Y2K testing. -Joe -- See http://www.inwap.com/ for PDP-10 and "ReBoot" pages. ###### From: gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 11 May 2000 18:39:51 GMT Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 19 Message-ID: <8feupn$fmd@gap.cco.caltech.edu> References: <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39105E1C.6DC3E519@trailing-edge.com> <8eukqj$n46$12@bob.news.rcn.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: seniti.ugcs.caltech.edu X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1 (NOV) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!uchinews!nntp-server.caltech.edu!gah Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56052 jmfbahciv@aol.com writes: >In article <39105E1C.6DC3E519@trailing-edge.com>, > Tim Shoppa wrote: >>Edward A. Falk wrote: >>> Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to get the >>> documentation. >> >>Actually, it's not that bad. Eric Smith has several of the relevant >>manuals online at http://www.36bit.org/dec/manual/ , most >>notably the "DECsystem-10/DECSYSTEM-20 Processor Reference >>Manual". This is a big win. Note that IBM still sells the "Principles of Operation" (what you call processor reference) for S/360 and S/370. Pretty reasonably priced, too! Then again, the ESA/390 manuals are on the web. -- glen ###### From: allen.baum@compaq.com (Allen J. Baum) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 16:00:08 -0700 Organization: Compaq Computer Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3910d117_1@news.wizvax.net> <3910d9cb$0$223@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: althea.pa.dec.com X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!headwall.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsgate.tandem.com!mailint03.im.hou.compaq.com!pa.dec.com!src.dec.com!allen.baum Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56207 In article , alderson@netcom.com wrote: >It was an Alpha running *Ken Harrenstein's* emulator, which Digital was at that >time touting to the fast-fading 36-bit crowd as a way to migrate onto the Alpha >platform. Bob Supnik's emulators are good, but none of them are 36-bit: He >did the PDP-1, the -4/7/9/15, the -8/12 (I think), and the DG Nova (!). Ah, thank you very much for the correction. It won't happen again. >Right after Gates got his Alpha, Paul Allen bought a Toad-1 System... Ah, I'd wondered who bought them )I'm not sure how many were sold). -- ********************************************** * Allen J. Baum tel. (650)853-6626 * * Compaq Computer Corp. fax (650)853-6513 * * 181 Lytton Ave. * * Palo Alto, CA 95306 abaum@pa.dec.com * ********************************************** ###### Message-ID: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 30 NNTP-Posting-Host: async229-syd-isp-4.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958477948 203.101.4.230 (Tue, 16 May 2000 21:52:28 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 21:52:28 EST Distribution: world Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 21:52:14 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56356 Tim, or anyone else: Hi. I'm making myself a PC, and I'm putting it in a 'skyscraper' case. Which is a modified full tower case. I may even start fom stractch, and build a new one. I'm putting in ALL kinds of weird and unusual devices (mostly drives) in it. What's the biggest floppy ? (8", I've got, but I want bigger, if it exists). And what about tape drives, such as the 7-track & 9-track mentioned. Are these the standard types, from the early 90's ? If not, what extra unusual and rarely used (today) drives can I install ? Thanks heaps. -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Message-ID: <3920FFD9.1862E4A1@trailing-edge.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 07:59:21 -0400 From: Tim Shoppa Organization: Trailing Edge Technology X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.03Gold (X11; I; OpenVMS V7.0 DEC 3000 Model 300L) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.73.218.130 X-Trace: reader2.news.uu.net 958478362 3118 63.73.218.130 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!spool0.news.uu.net!reader2.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56375 Joshua Hrouda wrote: > > Tim, or anyone else: > Hi. I'm making myself a PC, and I'm putting it in a 'skyscraper' case. Which is a > modified full tower case. I may even start fom stractch, and build a new one. > > I'm putting in ALL kinds of weird and unusual devices (mostly drives) in it. > What's the biggest floppy ? (8", I've got, but I want bigger, if it exists). > And what about tape drives, such as the 7-track & 9-track mentioned. > Are these the standard types, from the early 90's ? And the 80's, and the 70's, and the 60's... You are not going to fit a 7-track drive inside a PC-clone case. The other way around, sure, that's easy :-) -- Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa@trailing-edge.com Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/ 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917 Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927 ###### Message-ID: <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> From: Johnny Billquist Organization: Netinsight AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 31 Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 11:59:22 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.16.221.33 X-Complaints-To: abuse@telia.com X-Trace: newsc.telia.net 958478362 194.16.221.33 (Tue, 16 May 2000 13:59:22 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 13:59:22 MET DST Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!netnews.globalip.ch!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!newsfeedZ.netscum.dQ!netscum.int!uninett.no!newsfeed1.telia.no!masternews.telia.net!newsc.telia.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56321 Joshua Hrouda wrote: > > I'm putting in ALL kinds of weird and unusual devices (mostly drives) in it. > What's the biggest floppy ? (8", I've got, but I want bigger, if it exists). 8" is the normal floppy. I'm not aware of anything larger, but there might have been some oddball device around. > And what about tape drives, such as the 7-track & 9-track mentioned. > Are these the standard types, from the early 90's ? Try early '80s. Well, 7-track anyway. I guess you can still find 9-track tapes if you care to. They do exist with SCSI. I very much doubt you'll find any 7-track tape drives around. They went out of fashion before the IBM PC were invented, and I don't think anyone ever have considered attaching one. Which means you'll have to build your own interface as well. > If not, what extra unusual and rarely used (today) drives can I install ? There are lots of them, except I guess a PC might be problematic. You could have paper tape, punch cards and DECtape for starters. Johnny -- Johnny Billquist | johnny.billquist@netinsight.net Net Insight AB | phone: +46 8 685 04 88 Västberga Allé 9 | fax: +46 8 685 04 20 Box 42093 | SE-126 30 STOCKHOLM, Sweden | http://www.netinsight.net ###### From: "David Cressey" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Lines: 60 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Message-ID: <1mbU4.837$s4.73827@petpeeve.ziplink.net> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 12:41:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.15.159.241 X-Trace: petpeeve.ziplink.net 958480893 206.15.159.241 (Tue, 16 May 2000 08:41:33 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 08:41:33 EDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.shore.net!feedme.ziplink.net!petpeeve.ziplink.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56424 The first floppies ever manufactured were 8". The name "floppy" comes from these beasts. With the flexible cover, and such a large area, they would bend over if you held them from one edge. A friend of mine showed me an article in one of the trade journals last year that showed significant inventions from 1970 (or maybe 1969). The floppy was one such invention. The first floppies were used in keydisk machines that replaced the 026 keypunch (punched cards). The floppy collected card images, and the reader passed card images onto a big batch machine. My first contact with 8" floppies was in 1978, when I managed a DECsystem-20. This machine has a PDP-11 for a front end. The PDP-11 used 8" floppies as an installation device. Good luck in your endeavor. David Cressey, consultant david@dcressey.com Joshua Hrouda wrote in message <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com>... >Tim, or anyone else: >Hi. I'm making myself a PC, and I'm putting it in a 'skyscraper' case. Which is a >modified full tower case. I may even start fom stractch, and build a new one. > >I'm putting in ALL kinds of weird and unusual devices (mostly drives) in it. >What's the biggest floppy ? (8", I've got, but I want bigger, if it exists). >And what about tape drives, such as the 7-track & 9-track mentioned. >Are these the standard types, from the early 90's ? >If not, what extra unusual and rarely used (today) drives can I install ? > >Thanks heaps. > >-- >Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* >Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* >Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** >BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* > users, and not enough ** ****** ******* > time :( ** ** ** >E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* > com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* >Ph: (02) 9708-6645 >mBox: (02) 8588-8580 >IRC: Josh90 >ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) >Napster: Josh90 >Address: 77 Woodbine St, >Yagoona, NSW, Australia > > ###### From: glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 16 May 2000 12:49:13 GMT Organization: IBM Austin Lines: 33 Message-ID: <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> Reply-To: wa4qal@vnet.ibm.com NNTP-Posting-Host: glass2.cv.lexington.ibm.com X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!europa.netcrusader.net!152.163.239.131!portc03.blue.aol.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!an02.austin.ibm.com!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56417 In <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com>, Joshua Hrouda writes: >Tim, or anyone else: >Hi. I'm making myself a PC, and I'm putting it in a 'skyscraper' case. Which is a >modified full tower case. I may even start fom stractch, and build a new one. > >I'm putting in ALL kinds of weird and unusual devices (mostly drives) in it. >What's the biggest floppy ? (8", I've got, but I want bigger, if it exists). >And what about tape drives, such as the 7-track & 9-track mentioned. >Are these the standard types, from the early 90's ? >If not, what extra unusual and rarely used (today) drives can I install ? > >Thanks heaps. > >-- >Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Well, while technically not a floppy, there existed 14 inch removable platter disks. Might be a bit hard to fit in a PC case, even a skyscraper one. But, if you accomplish that, then you can always aim toward fitting a rotating drum memory (e.g., IBM 2305) into (err, onto?) it. If you accomplish either of these, I'm sure that quite a few of us would appreciate pictures. As for tapes, you could consider putting a mainframe style cartridge tape drive in it (IBM 3480 style cartridges). Dave P.S. Standard Disclaimer: I work for them, but I don't speak for them. ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Organization: D Bit, Troy, NY From: wilson@dbit.com (John Wilson) NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com Message-ID: <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> Date: 16 May 2000 10:01:27 -0400 X-Trace: 16 May 2000 10:01:27 -0400, dbit.dbit.com Lines: 19 XPident: wilson X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.181.141.3 XPident: news Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer.phoen-x.net!news.wizvax.net!dbit.com!wilson Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56289 In article <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se>, Johnny Billquist wrote: >I very much doubt you'll >find any 7-track tape drives around. They went out of fashion before >the IBM PC were invented, and I don't think anyone ever have considered >attaching one. Which means you'll have to build your own interface >as well. Not like I would know anything about it, but I've *heard* that there exist boards which will connect an IBM channel to the ISA bus. Supposedly this is the cheap way to connect a real 3480 to a 370 simulator (because SCSI 3480 clones can cost 5 figures $US). If *that* works, maybe it's possible to attach a 7-track drive that way too. SCSI 7-trackers: well I'd sure buy one! If the price was right, which it couldn't possibly be at the low volume they'd have. John Wilson D Bit ###### From: jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx (Jay Maynard) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> Reply-To: jmaynard@texas.net Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.4 (UNIX) Lines: 24 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:18:38 CDT Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv2-7NxEQoMtt+A/6N6G1GzVAW4Gu9TEaswGmuvmXVxq2MiNKd/gu1D5e/vBJFvf+zSjUj2z6ttKNCXsE0b!LUrOwBXPNagF/aGbBaHOJA== X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:18:38 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.flash.net!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.giganews.com!news6.giganews.com.POSTED!jmaynard Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56293 On 16 May 2000 10:01:27 -0400, John Wilson wrote: >Not like I would know anything about it, but I've *heard* that there exist >boards which will connect an IBM channel to the ISA bus. Supposedly this >is the cheap way to connect a real 3480 to a 370 simulator (because SCSI >3480 clones can cost 5 figures $US). If *that* works, maybe it's possible >to attach a 7-track drive that way too. They do exist, but finding them might be *very* hard; outside of a very few, they were mainly made for the MicroChannel 370/390 systems IBM sold into the low end. (I don't know if the current P/390 systems are PCI or not, but they're even more hideously expen$ive.) The channel interface is simple enough that a dumb board could probably be built out of one or two PLAs, these days, and a moderately intelligent one with a not-too-fast micro. (Hm. Maybe a parallel-to-channel adapter...oink.) >SCSI 7-trackers: well I'd sure buy one! If the price was right, which it >couldn't possibly be at the low volume they'd have. Did they make 7-track drives with the same interface as the Pertec 9-track drives? If so, you might be able to get there by taking the SCSI interface out of one of the SCSI 9-track drives (at least, I know Qualstar does it by makign their SCSI interface drive the Pertec interface on the back side) and hanging it on a 7-track drive. ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: Terry Kennedy Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@spc.edu if this posting is inappropriate User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (BSD/OS/4.1 (i386)) NNTP-Posting-Host: gate.tmk.com Organization: St. Peter's College, US Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> X-Trace: spcuna.spc.edu 958487166 8406 terry [204.141.35.61] Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:26:06 GMT Lines: 27 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!newsfeed.rhein-neckar.de!news.rhein-neckar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!ptdnetP!newsgate.ptd.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nac.net!news.new-york.net!news.spc.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56298 In comp.org.decus Johnny Billquist wrote: > Try early '80s. Well, 7-track anyway. I guess you can still find 9-track > tapes if you care to. They do exist with SCSI. I very much doubt you'll > find any 7-track tape drives around. They went out of fashion before > the IBM PC were invented, and I don't think anyone ever have considered > attaching one. Which means you'll have to build your own interface > as well. 7-track was long gone (except for the occasional leftover used to read old tapes) by the 80's. We had a 370/115 (I know, don't laugh, but at least it was a 370) in 1976 which had 3410 9-track drives. These were the goofy roll-top-desk-like drives. I'm pretty sure that the maximum density on 7- track was 800BPI (the other densities were 200BPI and 556BPI), so 9-track caught on rapidly due to offering 1600BPI (the 3410's were 1600BPI only unless you paid more for the 800BPI option, which was still 9-track, not 7-track). I think this means there was a generation of 9-track 800BPI units before the 3410. The 3420's offered 6250BPI on some models. I had a string of 3420 drives, some of which were re-badged 2420's, so that would imply that 9-track was available back in the later S/360 era. To answer another poster: the 8" floppy was designed by IBM for micro- code loads (IMPL) on mainframes - in particular, the S/370. Once they had it, IBM used it in all sorts of unit record equipment like the keypunch emulators you mentioned. Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com terry@tmk.com Jersey City, NJ USA ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Organization: D Bit, Troy, NY From: wilson@dbit.com (John Wilson) NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com Message-ID: <39216195_1@news.wizvax.net> Date: 16 May 2000 10:56:21 -0400 X-Trace: 16 May 2000 10:56:21 -0400, dbit.dbit.com Lines: 14 XPident: wilson X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.181.141.3 XPident: news Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!netnews.globalip.ch!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!newsfeed.wizvax.net!news.wizvax.net!dbit.com!wilson Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56280 In article , Terry Kennedy wrote: > To answer another poster: the 8" floppy was designed by IBM for micro- >code loads (IMPL) on mainframes - in particular, the S/370. Once they had >it, IBM used it in all sorts of unit record equipment like the keypunch >emulators you mentioned. I vaguely remember reading some story that floppy disks were actually invented by some crazy inventor type in Japan (???) in the 50s, for audio recording or something. IIRC IBM denies this is the case but paid the guy off anyway. Sound familiar to anyone? John Wilson D Bit ###### Message-ID: <39213723.1D6B687@trailing-edge.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 11:55:15 -0400 From: Tim Shoppa Organization: Trailing Edge Technology X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.03Gold (X11; I; OpenVMS V7.0 DEC 3000 Model 300L) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <39216195_1@news.wizvax.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.73.218.130 X-Trace: reader1.news.uu.net 958492516 18133 63.73.218.130 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!join.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!zur.uu.net!ffx.uu.net!spool0.news.uu.net!reader1.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56357 John Wilson wrote: > > In article , > Terry Kennedy wrote: > > To answer another poster: the 8" floppy was designed by IBM for micro- > >code loads (IMPL) on mainframes - in particular, the S/370. Once they had > >it, IBM used it in all sorts of unit record equipment like the keypunch > >emulators you mentioned. > > I vaguely remember reading some story that floppy disks were actually invented > by some crazy inventor type in Japan (???) in the 50s, for audio recording > or something. IIRC IBM denies this is the case but paid the guy off anyway. > Sound familiar to anyone? Not exactly in the right chronological order, but when cheap used 5.25" floppies began flooding the surplus markets in the late 80's and early 90's I bought some, hooked a UART and A/D and D/A coverters up, and had 8-bit sound recording. There was a loud click every rotation as the track was switched though, and at 5 or 6 rotations per second I only got 7 seconds on a single-sided 5.25" floppy. (The drives I was using were Tandon TM-100's, I don't think I ever got double sided operation working right with automatic head switching.) Just a little bit more primitive than MP3 players, but a whole lot more fun :-). Tim. ###### X-Posting-Agent: Hamster/1.3.18.0 From: Nick Spalding Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Reply-To: spalding@iol.ie Message-ID: <5oo2is802njmhcetuvbt29hhea29h64li7@4ax.com> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 9 Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 17:42:48 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.203.144.198 X-Complaints-To: abuse@iol.ie X-Trace: news.iol.ie 958498968 193.203.144.198 (Tue, 16 May 2000 18:42:48 BST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 18:42:48 BST Organization: Ireland On-Line Customer Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!enews.sgi.com!newsxfer.eecs.umich.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!iol.ie!news.iol.ie!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56436 Terry Kennedy wrote: > I think this means there was a generation of 9-track 800BPI units > before the 3410. In the IBM world 9-track came in with 360 in 1964. I doubt if many 7-tracks were built after that. -- Nick Spalding ###### From: albaugh@agames.com (Mike Albaugh) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Followup-To: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Date: 16 May 2000 18:33:47 GMT Organization: Atari Games Corporation Lines: 33 Message-ID: <8fs4ab$7n8$1@null.agames.com> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <39216195_1@news.wizvax.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: java.agames.com X-Trace: null.agames.com 958502027 7912 192.245.83.156 (16 May 2000 18:33:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@agames.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 May 2000 18:33:47 GMT X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!enews.sgi.com!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!newshub1.rdc1.nsw.optushome.com.au!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!newshub1.home.com!news.home.com!newshub1-work.home.com!null!albaugh Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56337 John Wilson (wilson@dbit.com) wrote: : In article , : Terry Kennedy wrote: : > To answer another poster: the 8" floppy was designed by IBM for micro- : >code loads (IMPL) on mainframes - in particular, the S/370. Once they had : >it, IBM used it in all sorts of unit record equipment like the keypunch : >emulators you mentioned. : I vaguely remember reading some story that floppy disks were actually invented : by some crazy inventor type in Japan (???) in the 50s, for audio recording : or something. IIRC IBM denies this is the case but paid the guy off anyway. : Sound familiar to anyone? The "crazy guy in japan" part and the patent-part are "news to me", but I used to _have_ an "audio floppy" drive. It seems to have disappered along with my magneto-restrictive delay-lines and the air-system-sockets for the tubes from my SolidState90 :-) Anyway, my high-school language-lab used these things when I was there, and got rid of them shortly after I graduated (1967), whereupon I saved one from the dumpster. They looked a lot like a normal turntable (Hm,... maybe I need to explain what one of _them_ looks like :-), with a very narrow "record head" in the end of the "tone arm" instead of a needle. The "records" were rubber with some sort of oxide mixed-in. They looked like single-sided LPs (ask an old guy :-) with very coarse grooves. the idea was that you would record yourself responding to the "practice dialog" ("Guten Tag, Luisa, wie gehts?", or "Italia est paene insula") and then just pick up and re-position the needle to hear how you sounded. I do not recall a Japanese name or logo on them, but that was a _long_ time ago... Mike | albaugh@agames.com, speaking only for myself ###### From: mario@klebsch.de (Mario Klebsch) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 23:10:17 +0200 Organization: T-Online Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 958516028 18 29365 340014289748-0001 000516 22:27:08 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.de X-Sender: 340014289748-0001@t-dialin.net X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 CURRENT #121 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!colt.net!news0.de.colt.net!newscore.gigabell.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.btx.dtag.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56489 Johnny Billquist writes: >8" is the normal floppy. I'm not aware of anything larger, but there >might have been some oddball device around. 8" hard sectored should be one of the oldest and probably oddest floppy drives, I know of. The oposite extreme in size, I saw, were 2 1/2" floppies (or were they 2"?). The floppy disk did not even have a closed case. I saw them in a typewriter made by Olympia. 73, Mario -- Mario Klebsch mario@klebsch.de ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> Organization: Daedalus Consulting X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: don@news.daedalus.co.nz (Don Stokes) Message-ID: <958513440.489880@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Cache-Post-Path: shelley.paradise.net.nz!unknown@203-96-144-16.cable.paradise.net.nz X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b2 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) Lines: 12 Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 21:44:16 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.96.152.26 X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 958513456 203.96.152.26 (Wed, 17 May 2000 09:44:16 NZST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 09:44:16 NZST Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!unlisys!news.snafu.de!newsfeedZ.netscum.dQ!netscum.int!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56508 In article , Jay Maynard wrote: >Did they make 7-track drives with the same interface as the Pertec 9-track >drives? If so, you might be able to get there by taking the SCSI interface >out of one of the SCSI 9-track drives (at least, I know Qualstar does it by >makign their SCSI interface drive the Pertec interface on the back side) and >hanging it on a 7-track drive. There are Pertec-to-SCSI converter boxes. I had one in front of me yesterday hooking a Cipher drive to a 'x86 box. -- don ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Organization: Daedalus Consulting X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: don@news.daedalus.co.nz (Don Stokes) Message-ID: <958519342.614172@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Cache-Post-Path: shelley.paradise.net.nz!unknown@203-96-144-16.cable.paradise.net.nz X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b2 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) Lines: 16 Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 23:22:39 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.96.152.26 X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 958519359 203.96.152.26 (Wed, 17 May 2000 11:22:39 NZST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 11:22:39 NZST Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!newsfeed.rhein-neckar.de!news.rhein-neckar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!blackbush.xlink.net!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56505 In article , Mario Klebsch wrote: >The oposite extreme in size, I saw, were 2 1/2" floppies (or were they >2"?). The floppy disk did not even have a closed case. I saw them in >a typewriter made by Olympia. There were such things as 2.5" floppies, that looked a lot like shrunken 3.5" floppies. Some early 90s Zenith laptops used them. I suspect that the reduction in storage wasn't justified by the utility added by going smaller. A 3.5" floppy fits in a shirt pocket (which a 5.25" floppy doesn't), and that's small enough. 8-) (Actually, I do have shirts with pockets that'll take a 5.25" floppy...) -- don ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: Terry Kennedy Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@spc.edu if this posting is inappropriate User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (BSD/OS/4.1 (i386)) NNTP-Posting-Host: gate.tmk.com Organization: St. Peter's College, US Message-ID: References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> X-Trace: spcuna.spc.edu 958521391 5000 terry [204.141.35.61] Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 23:56:32 GMT Lines: 20 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nac.net!news.new-york.net!news.spc.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56466 In alt.folklore.computers Jay Maynard wrote: > Did they make 7-track drives with the same interface as the Pertec 9-track > drives? If so, you might be able to get there by taking the SCSI interface > out of one of the SCSI 9-track drives (at least, I know Qualstar does it by > makign their SCSI interface drive the Pertec interface on the back side) and > hanging it on a 7-track drive. Yes, but these were *unformatted* Pertec interfaces - the ones you never see anymore because the spec for the interface chips is RTL or DTL (I for- get which - it's been 20+ years since I designed an unformatted Pertec con- troller). Modern-ish 9-track drives use *formatted* Pertec interfaces. Examples are the Cipher F880 (DEC TS05), MPI blah-blah (DEC TU80), and so forth. The guts of the TU7x drives from DEC (actually built by Pertec and then Triumph- Adler) are in fact unformatted Pertec, which is why the DEC formatters are so bizarre. Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com terry@tmk.com Jersey City, NJ USA ###### From: Jim Thomas Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:04:47 -1000 Organization: Canada France Hawai`i Telescope Corporation Lines: 19 Message-ID: <3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: saturn.cfht.hawaii.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.hawaii.edu 958521887 23504 128.171.80.131 (17 May 2000 00:04:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@hawaii.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2000 00:04:47 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/735) X-Accept-Language: en Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!join.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!cnn.nas.nasa.gov!news.hawaii.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56484 Terry Kennedy wrote: > 7-track was long gone (except for the occasional leftover used to read > old tapes) by the 80's. We had a 370/115 (I know, don't laugh, but at least > it was a 370) in 1976 which had 3410 9-track drives. These were the goofy > roll-top-desk-like drives. I'm pretty sure that the maximum density on 7- > track was 800BPI (the other densities were 200BPI and 556BPI), so 9-track > caught on rapidly due to offering 1600BPI (the 3410's were 1600BPI only > unless you paid more for the 800BPI option, which was still 9-track, not > 7-track). I think this means there was a generation of 9-track 800BPI units > before the 3410. The 3420's offered 6250BPI on some models. I had a string > of 3420 drives, some of which were re-badged 2420's, so that would imply > that 9-track was available back in the later S/360 era. 7-track did come in 200/556/800 BPI NRZI varieties. The 2410 came out with the first 360's in 800/1600 BPI PE. Umm, can you say "8-bit bytes" to yourself ?-) Nothead ###### From: aek@spies.com (Al Kossow) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 17:40:53 -0700 Organization: Apple Computer, Inc. Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: haxrus.apple.com X-Trace: news.apple.com 958524053 21793 17.205.21.66 (17 May 2000 00:40:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.apple.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2000 00:40:53 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!uchinews!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!forum.apple.com!news.apple.com!haxrus.apple.com!user Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56498 In article , Terry Kennedy wrote: > you might be able to get there by taking the SCSI interface > > out of one of the SCSI 9-track drives (at least, I know Qualstar does it by > > makign their SCSI interface drive the Pertec interface on the back side) and > > hanging it on a 7-track drive. > Good luck FINDING a 7 track drive. The last one I heard about was a 7 track TU10 on eBay last year. I'm REALLY happy that I don't have any tapes that are 7 track :-) I remember hearing a story about Stanford scrambling around trying to find a 7 track TU10 in the late 80's to try to read SAIL tapes. > Yes, but these were *unformatted* Pertec interfaces - the ones you never > see anymore because the spec for the interface chips is RTL or DTL (I for- > get which - it's been 20+ years since I designed an unformatted Pertec con- > troller). > From memory, unformatted drives have three connectors, read data, write data, and control. Cipher, Pertec, and others sold formatter boxes to go with this that provided a record level interface which is where the "formatted" drives came from (they integrated the separate formatter box into the tape drive). Early Emulex and Wespercomp TM11 emulating controllers worked with unformatted tape drives, later designs used the formatted ones (Cipher 980/990s etc). -- The eBay Curse: "May you find everything you're looking for.." ###### From: "David Cressey" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu> Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Lines: 49 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 12:52:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.15.159.160 X-Trace: petpeeve.ziplink.net 958567953 206.15.159.160 (Wed, 17 May 2000 08:52:33 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 08:52:33 EDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.shore.net!feedme.ziplink.net!petpeeve.ziplink.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56510 All of this talk about 7 and 9 track tapes bring back a war story from the days I was a digit. I was teaching DEC-10 courses in Marlboro in the late 70s, before they opened the training center in Bedford. I was teaching this DEC-10 admin (read: system manager) course for customers. The admin course was always a tough, tough course to teach. The technical material was way easier to understand than the "monitor courses", but the audience was very, very demanding. I had two customers in the class, whom I will call Mr. IBM, and Mr. DEC. At a certain point, Mr. IBM asks me about support for 8-track tapes from his IBM system. He wants to know about volume and file label processing, not just whether the iron can read the bits. I give him the standard answer, which I have no reason to doubt, even today. If you are programming in COBOL, and you declare the appropriate clauses for IBM volume and file labels, and declare that the recording mode is EBCDIC, the COBOL run time system will read the data just fine. It will detect and process the labels, and take corresponding action. It will convert from EBCDIC to ASCII wherever necessary, and it's all been tested, and it all works. After glaring at me to see if I might not be lying, Mr. IBM, apparently accepts all this, and jots down a note. Sometime later that day, Mr. DEC pipes up. He's got a lot of PDP-11s at the shop and they just bought a DEC-10. So he asks me about reading PDP-11 DECtapes on the DECtape drive on his system (we're talking DEC-10 DECtapes on a KA here). So I hem and haw, and say that we don't actually have a supported solution for that, but that I heard that the DECUS library had an offering that claims to do that. Mr. DEC is happy. He's been to the DECUS library before, and he knows his chances are awfully good. But Mr. IBM is scowling deeply. I know what's coming. Sure enough, he seeks me out at the next break, (far too classy to disrupt my presentation). And he accuses me: You assured me that your cross vendor solution for IBM tapes was tested and supported. How can I believe you when you don't even support the rest of DEC's product line! Well, there it was. I was stuck. I gave him the names of some people he could call to reassure himself, and I advised him to test it for himself back at his site. But he never smiled at me again, for the rest of the week. I don't blame him! ###### From: "Mike Yankus" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 09:24:18 -0500 Organization: Sterling Software, Inc. Lines: 16 Message-ID: <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pc-504.itd.sterling.com X-Trace: reuters.plano.sterling.com 958573466 15668 10.1.27.104 (17 May 2000 14:24:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@reuters.plano.sterling.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2000 14:24:26 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!Quza.UK.peer!nntp.gblx.net!ams.uu.net!ffx.uu.net!hype.plano.sterling.com!news.plano.sterling.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56517 Jay Maynard wrote in message news:slrn8i2m5v.nqe.jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx... > > (Hm. Maybe a parallel-to-channel adapter...oink.) > Such things were built. There was a UNIBUS to IBM channel device. I don't remember who built it. In the early/mid 70's there were lots of interface devices being built for the UNIBUS. DEC had its own group, Computer Special Systems (CSS?) who would custom build such things. Mike ###### From: "Mike Yankus" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 09:37:11 -0500 Organization: Sterling Software, Inc. Lines: 24 Message-ID: <8fuaqu$guv$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: pc-504.itd.sterling.com X-Trace: reuters.plano.sterling.com 958574238 17375 10.1.27.104 (17 May 2000 14:37:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@reuters.plano.sterling.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2000 14:37:18 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!newsfeed.icl.net!colt.net!news-lond.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!ams.uu.net!ffx.uu.net!hype.plano.sterling.com!news.plano.sterling.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56524 Jim Thomas wrote in message news:3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu... > > 7-track did come in 200/556/800 BPI NRZI varieties. The 2410 came out with > the first 360's in 800/1600 BPI PE. Umm, can you say "8-bit bytes" to > yourself ?-) > Nothead > Another interesting thing about 7 tracks, you got to choose parity, even or odd (nine tracks were always odd). If you choose even parity, you could not write a 0. I don't remember which character this was in 6-bit code (a blank?), but it was translated to something else in even parity mode (at least on IBM 360 equipment). IBM also had (several??) options for writing 8 bit binary to 7 track tape. I don't recall the details except that they had to be odd parity. Mike ###### From: "Mike Yankus" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 09:47:31 -0500 Organization: Sterling Software, Inc. Lines: 52 Message-ID: <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pc-504.itd.sterling.com X-Trace: reuters.plano.sterling.com 958574857 18049 10.1.27.104 (17 May 2000 14:47:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@reuters.plano.sterling.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2000 14:47:37 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!news-out-b.news.pipex.net.MISMATCH!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!zur.uu.net!ffx.uu.net!hype.plano.sterling.com!news.plano.sterling.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56516 wrote in message news:8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com... > In <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com>, Joshua Hrouda writes: > >Tim, or anyone else: > >Hi. I'm making myself a PC, and I'm putting it in a 'skyscraper' case. Which is a > >modified full tower case. I may even start fom stractch, and build a new one. > > > >I'm putting in ALL kinds of weird and unusual devices (mostly drives) in it. > >What's the biggest floppy ? (8", I've got, but I want bigger, if it exists). > >And what about tape drives, such as the 7-track & 9-track mentioned. > >Are these the standard types, from the early 90's ? > >If not, what extra unusual and rarely used (today) drives can I install ? > > > >Thanks heaps. > > > >-- > >Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* > > > Well, while technically not a floppy, there existed 14 inch removable platter > disks. Might be a bit hard to fit in a PC case, even a skyscraper one. > > But, if you accomplish that, then you can always aim toward fitting a > rotating drum memory (e.g., IBM 2305) into (err, onto?) it. > > If you accomplish either of these, I'm sure that quite a few of us would > appreciate pictures. > > As for tapes, you could consider putting a mainframe style cartridge > tape drive in it (IBM 3480 style cartridges). > > Dave > > P.S. Standard Disclaimer: I work for them, but I don't speak for them. > What indeed was the largest tape/disk peripheral devices ever built (single tape, single spindle disk)? I have heard about drums that had a horizontal axis and were several yards long. The rotational momentum was something to worry about. I vaguely remember a horror story about trying to move one of these things while it was spinning. Mike ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: dp@world.std.com (Jeff DelPapa) Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 16:11:43 GMT References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> Organization: Chaos and Confusion Lines: 26 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!world!dp Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56465 In article <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com>, Mike Yankus wrote: > > >What indeed was the largest tape/disk peripheral devices ever built >(single tape, single spindle disk)? I have heard about drums that >had a horizontal axis and were several yards long. The rotational >momentum was something to worry about. I vaguely remember a horror >story about trying to move one of these things while it was spinning. > While not as large as some drums, there are examples of single disk platters 1.25 meters in diameter. These were usually head-per-track drives, used for swapping. At one point, a platter from such a drive was turned into a coffee table at SAIL. I have heard of such a drive getting disturbed, and shedding a platter. Since I haven't heard any more details, I assume it was an urban legend. (neat story, had it leaving thru a concrete wall) -dp- Organizer, The New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society; The NERDS. The first US team to compete in the British Scrapheap Challenge. www.the-nerds.org ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> Organization: D Bit, Troy, NY From: wilson@dbit.com (John Wilson) NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com Message-ID: <3922d53f_1@news.wizvax.net> Date: 17 May 2000 13:22:07 -0400 X-Trace: 17 May 2000 13:22:07 -0400, dbit.dbit.com Lines: 23 XPident: wilson X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.181.141.3 XPident: news Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!psinet-eu-nl!psiuk-p4!uknet!news-hub.cableinet.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!newsfeed.wizvax.net!news.wizvax.net!dbit.com!wilson Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56469 In article <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com>, Mike Yankus wrote: >Jay Maynard wrote in message >news:slrn8i2m5v.nqe.jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx... >> >> (Hm. Maybe a parallel-to-channel adapter...oink.) >> > >Such things were built. There was a UNIBUS to IBM channel >device. I don't remember who built it. Isn't that the DX11? But I think Jay meant, something which plugs into a printer port on a micro. FWIW the ISA-to-channel board I heard about was within the last few years, and I don't think it was an IBM product (so it may still be in production). The user was running MTS under FunSoft's OPEN/370 emulator, and he was happy because he got to recycle the tape drives he already had (which he said would have cost $1500/ea used), instead of blowing $15K or whatever for a SCSI 3480. John Wilson D Bit ###### From: "Charlie Gibbs" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 17 May 00 11:32:49 -0800 Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Lines: 15 Message-ID: <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com> References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-702.newsdawg.com X-Newsreader: THOR 2.5a (Amiga;TCP/IP) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!uni-erlangen.de!newsfeed.germany.net!newscore.gigabell.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!skynet.be!208.171.248.21.MISMATCH!pln-e!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news1 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56548 In article <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> j_hrouda@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com (Joshua Hrouda) writes: >I'm putting in ALL kinds of weird and unusual devices (mostly drives) >in it. What's the biggest floppy ? (8", I've got, but I want bigger, >if it exists). How about those old Iomega cartridge drives that were the forerunner of Zip drives? I think the cartridges were slightly larger than 8-inch floppies. -- cgibbs@sky.bus.com (Charlie Gibbs) Remove the first period after the "at" sign to reply. ###### Message-ID: <3923224F.54B9248@bellatlantic.net> From: HerbalGypsy/justbobthebard Reply-To: shsrms@bellatlantic.net Organization: The Keltic League X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD BA45DSL (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <3922d53f_1@news.wizvax.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 28 Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 22:48:50 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.88.32.220 X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@bellatlantic.net X-Trace: typhoon2.ba-dsg.net 958603730 138.88.32.220 (Wed, 17 May 2000 18:48:50 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 18:48:50 EDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!triton.skycache.com!199.45.45.9!cyclone2.ba-dsg.net!typhoon2.ba-dsg.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56569 Frank Zereski was the guy responsible for the DX11. John Wilson wrote: > > In article <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com>, > Mike Yankus wrote: > >Jay Maynard wrote in message > >news:slrn8i2m5v.nqe.jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx... > >> > >> (Hm. Maybe a parallel-to-channel adapter...oink.) > >> > > > >Such things were built. There was a UNIBUS to IBM channel > >device. I don't remember who built it. > > Isn't that the DX11? > > But I think Jay meant, something which plugs into a printer port on a micro. > > FWIW the ISA-to-channel board I heard about was within the last few years, > and I don't think it was an IBM product (so it may still be in production). > The user was running MTS under FunSoft's OPEN/370 emulator, and he was happy > because he got to recycle the tape drives he already had (which he said would > have cost $1500/ea used), instead of blowing $15K or whatever for a SCSI 3480. > > John Wilson > D Bit ###### From: Jim Thomas Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 17 May 2000 14:07:48 -1000 Organization: Canada France Hawai`i Telescope Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: atlas.cfht.hawaii.edu X-Trace: news.hawaii.edu 958608470 21990 128.171.80.135 (18 May 2000 00:07:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@hawaii.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 May 2000 00:07:50 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!cnn.nas.nasa.gov!news.hawaii.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56602 >>>>> "David" == David Cressey writes: David> I was teaching DEC-10 courses in Marlboro in the late 70s, David> before they opened the training center in Bedford. David> ... David> Sometime later that day, Mr. DEC pipes up. He's got a lot of David> PDP-11s at the shop and they just bought a DEC-10. So he asks David> me about reading PDP-11 DECtapes on the DECtape drive on his David> system (we're talking DEC-10 DECtapes on a KA here). Late 70's? KA-10? Strange :-) Nothead ###### From: Jim Thomas Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 17 May 2000 14:15:25 -1000 Organization: Canada France Hawai`i Telescope Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu> <8fuaqu$guv$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: atlas.cfht.hawaii.edu X-Trace: news.hawaii.edu 958608926 21990 128.171.80.135 (18 May 2000 00:15:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@hawaii.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 May 2000 00:15:26 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!news.hawaii.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56599 >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Yankus writes: Mike> Another interesting thing about 7 tracks, you got to choose Mike> parity, even or odd (nine tracks were always odd). If you choose Mike> even parity, you could not write a 0. I don't remember which Mike> character this was in 6-bit code (a blank?), but it was Mike> translated to something else in even parity mode (at least on IBM Mike> 360 equipment). I may have gotten the "predecessor" part wrong, but ... :-) In BCD a "0" was "82". A blank was no data bits. It was the blank that had the problem on even parity tapes, but I can't remember what character got written instead. Who used even parity? Nothead ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: Terry Kennedy Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@spc.edu if this posting is inappropriate User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (BSD/OS/4.1 (i386)) NNTP-Posting-Host: gate.tmk.com Organization: St. Peter's College, US Message-ID: References: <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <3922d53f_1@news.wizvax.net> X-Trace: spcuna.spc.edu 958612855 23844 terry [204.141.35.61] Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 01:20:56 GMT Lines: 15 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nac.net!news.new-york.net!news.spc.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56558 In alt.folklore.computers John Wilson wrote: > But I think Jay meant, something which plugs into a printer port on a micro. How about the opposite direction? Back in the S-100 days, there was a S-100 card for connecting a 1403N1 printer to an S-100 system. While I didn't buy that one, I did do a prototype direct interface between a DG Nova 3 and a Xerox 9700 printing subsystem (not using the IBM channel interface on the 9700). The idea was to use it for draft typesetter out- put instead of running the job on a VIP (which was slow, noisy, and had "fonts" on pieces of film you wrapped around a drum. The project was canceled when the Linotron 202 came out, which used fonts on floppies and was trivially easy to interface to the DG. Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com terry@tmk.com Jersey City, NJ USA ###### From: jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx (Jay Maynard) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <3922d53f_1@news.wizvax.net> Reply-To: jmaynard@texas.net Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.4 (UNIX) Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 21:16:21 CDT Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv2-dcdR/kUyqootm8zQ07rSpYJxx+yXJmr58AtSgQZpdurC4Sa1/BRGm3XmS23l389UiJ/GuPe2Ra9TZ2M!LybQhr/n2BL47KQoc8TJ9Q== X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 02:16:21 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.giganews.com!news6.giganews.com.POSTED!jmaynard Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56546 On Thu, 18 May 2000 01:20:56 GMT, Terry Kennedy wrote: > How about the opposite direction? Back in the S-100 days, there was a >S-100 card for connecting a 1403N1 printer to an S-100 system. With or without the 2821? ...or was the -N1 the one with the built-in control unit? The mind boggles...While the 1403 was old, cranky, and slow, even in the days of S-100, it's still more printer than the fastest S-100 box can keep busy... and what do you drive it from? CP/M's DESPOOL?! ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com> Organization: Plethora . Net - More Net, Less Spam! X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Date: 18 May 2000 04:04:35 GMT Lines: 18 Message-ID: <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 160a0e25.news.plethora.net X-Trace: 958622675 gemini.plethora.net 85047 seebs@205.166.146.8 X-Complaints-To: abuse@plethora.net Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!newsreader.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!209.98.98.75.MISMATCH!gemini.plethora.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56596 In article <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com>, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >How about those old Iomega cartridge drives that were the forerunner >of Zip drives? I think the cartridges were slightly larger than >8-inch floppies. A fair amount larger, if you include thickness; I'd guess about 1/2" thick, going from memory. (We had one. I remember talking my parents into giving me an ENTIRE CARTRIDGE for my own stuff!) -s -- Copyright 2000, All rights reserved. Peter Seebach / seebs@plethora.net C/Unix wizard, Pro-commerce radical, Spam fighter. Boycott Spamazon! Consulting & Computers: http://www.plethora.net/ Get paid to surf! No spam. http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=GZX636 ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers From: jsaum@world.std.com (Jim Saum) Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 05:34:24 GMT References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp0b147.std.com Organization: Software Tool & Die X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4 Lines: 18 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!world!jsaum Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56530 In article <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com>, wa4qal@vnet.ibm.com wrote: >But, if you accomplish that, then you can always aim toward fitting a >rotating drum memory (e.g., IBM 2305) into (err, onto?) it. The 2305, part of the 370 peripheral family, was a fixed-head disk, not a drum. It consisted of several platters with a dedicated head for each track. Access time was rotational latency only, with no seek delay. IIRC, the official name was 2305 Fixed-Head Storage Facility. The 2301 and 2302 in the 360 peripheral line were actual drums, with rotating cylindrical surfaces instead of one or more platters. Some shops took to calling 2305's "drums" because they filled the same functional niches as their drum predecessors, i.e., fast, random-access, zero-seek-time devices. - Jim Saum ###### From: "David Cressey" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu> Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Lines: 18 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 05:43:01 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.15.143.125 X-Trace: petpeeve.ziplink.net 958628581 206.15.143.125 (Thu, 18 May 2000 01:43:01 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 01:43:01 EDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!nwnews.wa.com!nntp2.savvis.net!feedme.ziplink.net!petpeeve.ziplink.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56595 Not that strange, must have been a used one. Or maybe my memory is faulty on this detail. After all, it was over 20 years ago. I remember checking with the student to make sure the DECtape drives were DECsystem-10 DECtapes, and not the DECtapes that went with the PDP-11 front end for KL systems at that time. Jim Thomas wrote in message ... >>>>>> "David" == David Cressey writes: > >Late 70's? KA-10? Strange :-) > >Nothead ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: Terry Kennedy Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@spc.edu if this posting is inappropriate User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (BSD/OS/4.1 (i386)) NNTP-Posting-Host: gate.tmk.com Organization: St. Peter's College, US Message-ID: References: <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <3922d53f_1@news.wizvax.net> X-Trace: spcuna.spc.edu 958632352 29966 terry [204.141.35.61] Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 06:45:53 GMT Lines: 43 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!newsfeed.rhein-neckar.de!news.rhein-neckar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!blackbush.xlink.net!howland.erols.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.new-york.net!news.spc.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56542 In alt.folklore.computers Jay Maynard wrote: > With or without the 2821? ...or was the -N1 the one with the built-in > control unit? Good question. The 1403N1 could be attached to various 370 processors via a buult-in (to the 370) control unit. These were of the form I?A (Internal whatever Adapter) - I remember that 3340's used the IFA (F=File). I'd guess that the support for the 1403 was IPA (P=Print). An upgrade to a 4331 brought a 2821 into my life, unfortunately. The 2821 wasn't particularly bright - it held the core memory that kept track of where slugs were located on the print train and so forth and fired the hammers at the right time, but that was about it. > The mind boggles...While the 1403 was old, cranky, and slow, even in the > days of S-100, it's still more printer than the fastest S-100 box can keep > busy... and what do you drive it from? CP/M's DESPOOL?! Not really. An N1 is 1100LPM best-case (and a lot slower than that for certain pathological data cases - printing SPSS reports on a train without extra 0's dropped it to about 500LPM). I wrote a background spooler for CP/M that had no problem running Data- products 2260 printers (600LPM) in the background. I had a 2260 (later replaced with a B600) and it ran at full speed. We had some customers that had even faster printers (not sure if it was a 900 or a 1200LPM unit) and they said it ran at full speed. Of course, the CP/M implementation that my company provided was fully interrupt-driven with a DMA disk subsystem... For historical interest, I've placed the documentation from one of my company's CP/M releases on http://www.tmk.com/cpmstuff. Note that almost all of these are WordStar documents and may have some assorted weirdness when viewed in a browser - particularly at line breaks. Also, the address and phone number in those manuals is long gone, and the Pro-Comp systems mentioned in them has no relation to any current com- pany by that name (though some of these systems are still operating). Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com terry@tmk.com Jersey City, NJ USA ###### From: Charles Richmond Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 01:26:07 -0700 Organization: Cannine Computer Center Lines: 32 Message-ID: <3923A91F.35469A6F@dallas.net> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> Reply-To: richmond@dallas.net X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.he.net!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56531 Jeff DelPapa wrote: > > In article <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com>, > Mike Yankus wrote: > > > > > >What indeed was the largest tape/disk peripheral devices ever built > >(single tape, single spindle disk)? I have heard about drums that > >had a horizontal axis and were several yards long. The rotational > >momentum was something to worry about. I vaguely remember a horror > >story about trying to move one of these things while it was spinning. > > > > While not as large as some drums, there are examples of single disk > platters 1.25 meters in diameter. These were usually head-per-track > drives, used for swapping. At one point, a platter from such a drive > was turned into a coffee table at SAIL. > > I have heard of such a drive getting disturbed, and shedding a > platter. Since I haven't heard any more details, I assume it was an > urban legend. (neat story, had it leaving thru a concrete wall) > Could you be refering to Bryant disk drives??? My understanding is that the Bryant drive had one huge platter in the range of 1.25 meters across. This platter spun verically instead of horizontally, and it did spin fairly fast. I have heard stories of these platters getting loose and cutting through walls, etc. IMHO this is *not* an urban legend... -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Charles and Francis Richmond | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ ###### From: hawk@hawkins.cba.uni.edu Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 18 May 2000 09:55:56 -0500 Organization: House of Hawkins Lines: 23 Message-ID: <8g109s$fe7$1@hawkins.cba.uni.edu> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com> <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: hawkins.cba.uni.edu Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!uni-erlangen.de!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.enteract.com!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!news.uiowa.edu!news.physics.uiowa.edu!news.uni.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56577 In article <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net>, Peter Seebach wrote: >Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>How about those old Iomega cartridge drives that were the forerunner >>of Zip drives? I think the cartridges were slightly larger than >>8-inch floppies. >A fair amount larger, if you include thickness; I'd guess about 1/2" thick, >going from memory. >(We had one. I remember talking my parents into giving me an ENTIRE CARTRIDGE >for my own stuff!) Five megs? What in the world would you ever do with that much space? :) hawk -- Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. hawk@hawkins.cba.uni.edu (319) 266-7114 http://eyry.econ.iastate.edu/hawk These opinions will not be those of UNI until it pays my retainer. ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: dp@world.std.com (Jeff DelPapa) Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 17:03:55 GMT References: <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <3923A91F.35469A6F@dallas.net> Organization: Chaos and Confusion Lines: 44 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!blanket.mitre.org!world!dp Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56535 In article <3923A91F.35469A6F@dallas.net>, Charles Richmond wrote: >Jeff DelPapa wrote: >> >> In article <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com>, >> Mike Yankus wrote: >> > >> > >> >What indeed was the largest tape/disk peripheral devices ever built >> >(single tape, single spindle disk)? I have heard about drums that >> >had a horizontal axis and were several yards long. The rotational >> >momentum was something to worry about. I vaguely remember a horror >> >story about trying to move one of these things while it was spinning. >> > >> >> While not as large as some drums, there are examples of single disk >> platters 1.25 meters in diameter. These were usually head-per-track >> drives, used for swapping. At one point, a platter from such a drive >> was turned into a coffee table at SAIL. >> >> I have heard of such a drive getting disturbed, and shedding a >> platter. Since I haven't heard any more details, I assume it was an >> urban legend. (neat story, had it leaving thru a concrete wall) >> >Could you be refering to Bryant disk drives??? My understanding is that >the Bryant drive had one huge platter in the range of 1.25 meters across. >This platter spun verically instead of horizontally, and it did spin >fairly fast. I have heard stories of these platters getting loose and >cutting through walls, etc. IMHO this is *not* an urban legend... > Bryant was one maker, I think Control Data also made a huge plattered disk. By the time the story about the loose platter had got to me, it was devoid of sufficient specifics (where, how it came lose, when, etc) that it seemed prudent to consider the possiblility that it was legend. If you have a more complete version of the story, I would love to hear it. -dp- Organizer, The New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society; The NERDS We are the first US team to compete in the British Scrapheap Challenge competition. www.the-nerds.org ###### From: glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 18 May 2000 20:09:31 GMT Organization: IBM Austin Lines: 75 Message-ID: <8g1ilr$17ii$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> References: <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> <8fua2q$f9k$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <3922d53f_1@news.wizvax.net> Reply-To: wa4qal@vnet.ibm.com NNTP-Posting-Host: glass2.cv.lexington.ibm.com X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!psinet-eu-nl!psiuk-p4!uknet!newsfeed.mathworks.com!portc03.blue.aol.com!newsjunkie.ans.net!news.chips.ibm.com!newsfeed.btv.ibm.com!news2atm.raleigh.ibm.com!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56649 In , Terry Kennedy writes: >In alt.folklore.computers Jay Maynard wrote: >> With or without the 2821? ...or was the -N1 the one with the built-in >> control unit? > > Good question. The 1403N1 could be attached to various 370 processors via >a buult-in (to the 370) control unit. These were of the form I?A (Internal >whatever Adapter) - I remember that 3340's used the IFA (F=File). I'd guess >that the support for the 1403 was IPA (P=Print). An upgrade to a 4331 brought >a 2821 into my life, unfortunately. > > The 2821 wasn't particularly bright - it held the core memory that kept >track of where slugs were located on the print train and so forth and fired >the hammers at the right time, but that was about it. > >> The mind boggles...While the 1403 was old, cranky, and slow, even in the >> days of S-100, it's still more printer than the fastest S-100 box can keep >> busy... and what do you drive it from? CP/M's DESPOOL?! > > Not really. An N1 is 1100LPM best-case (and a lot slower than that for >certain pathological data cases - printing SPSS reports on a train without >extra 0's dropped it to about 500LPM). > > I wrote a background spooler for CP/M that had no problem running Data- >products 2260 printers (600LPM) in the background. I had a 2260 (later >replaced with a B600) and it ran at full speed. We had some customers that >had even faster printers (not sure if it was a 900 or a 1200LPM unit) and >they said it ran at full speed. > > Of course, the CP/M implementation that my company provided was fully >interrupt-driven with a DMA disk subsystem... > > For historical interest, I've placed the documentation from one of my >company's CP/M releases on http://www.tmk.com/cpmstuff. Note that almost >all of these are WordStar documents and may have some assorted weirdness >when viewed in a browser - particularly at line breaks. > > Also, the address and phone number in those manuals is long gone, and >the Pro-Comp systems mentioned in them has no relation to any current com- >pany by that name (though some of these systems are still operating). > > Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com > terry@tmk.com Jersey City, NJ USA You left out the part about the 1403N1/2821 conbination being a bit of a power hog. And this, when coupled with marginal air conditioning, created some real havoc. We had a 1403N1 installed in a temporary office (It had raised flooring, but it wasn't raised flooring like in a computer room, but was raised flooring because it was a trailer!). Anyway, the 1403N1/2821 combination produced enough heat that it overloaded the airconditioning in the trailer. Thus, when it was switched on in the morning, we got about 30 minutes of use out of it before the temperature had risen to the point that the bias point on the magnetic cores had shifted (They were temperature sensitive.), and this caused a device check. This was only about 10 years ago. We had it installed, and got the device check, so we called in a CE to work on it. The first one they dispatched walked in, looked at it, threw up his hands, turned around and left! It seems the printer was older than he was! What I thought was interesting was that the data entered the trailer through a fiber optic cable a little smaller than a pencil. This went to a 3044 Fiber Optic Channel Extender box, and a pair of channel cables, which were about an inch in diameter, came out of the other side of it. These went into the 2821, and a pair of printer cables, which were about 2 inches in diameter, came out of it and went to the 1403N1. It was kind of hard to believe that as the cables got bigger, the data got smaller. Dave P.S. Standard Disclaimer: I work for them, but I don't speak for them. ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 22 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 16:43:05 EDT Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 20:43:05 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56672 In article <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se>, Johnny Billquist wrote: >Try early '80s. Well, 7-track anyway. I guess you can still find 9-track >tapes if you care to. They do exist with SCSI. I very much doubt you'll >find any 7-track tape drives around. They went out of fashion before >the IBM PC were invented, and I don't think anyone ever have considered >attaching one. Which means you'll have to build your own interface >as well. The TCFS guys at MIT have a bunch of 7-track backup tapes from the early 1970s they wanted to read in 1995 (in order to transfer the data to a more modern medium). I thought I recalled that Tom Knight was going to build a 7-track tape drive for them, but I can't find a reference to that on the Web, so maybe I am misremembering. I don't know if they ever got data off the 7-track tapes onto DAT or not. -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com> <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 24 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 16:53:45 EDT Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 20:53:45 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!skynet.be!triton.skycache.com!63.211.125.72!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56674 In article <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net>, Peter Seebach wrote: >In article <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com>, >Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>How about those old Iomega cartridge drives that were the forerunner >>of Zip drives? I think the cartridges were slightly larger than >>8-inch floppies. > >A fair amount larger, if you include thickness; I'd guess about 1/2" thick, >going from memory. > >(We had one. I remember talking my parents into giving me an ENTIRE CARTRIDGE >for my own stuff!) These drives were "Bernoulli boxes", I think; the ones I saw were 5 1/4" across, and yes, about half an inch thick. They came in something like 15MB and 30MB sizes. Early models had quality problems. -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com> <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net> Organization: Plethora . Net - More Net, Less Spam! X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Date: 18 May 2000 21:42:37 GMT Lines: 16 Message-ID: <392463cd$0$85051$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 7e1efdd2.news.plethora.net X-Trace: 958686157 gemini.plethora.net 85051 seebs@205.166.146.8 X-Complaints-To: abuse@plethora.net Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!news.datacomm.ch!newscore.gigabell.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!diablo.theplanet.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!newsreader.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!209.98.98.75.MISMATCH!gemini.plethora.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56650 In article , Kragen Sitaker wrote: >These drives were "Bernoulli boxes", I think; the ones I saw were 5 >1/4" across, and yes, about half an inch thick. They came in something >like 15MB and 30MB sizes. That's different; these were 8" or so, and 10MB. Awesome units; I think my old one still works, along with the custom driver we had to run it off a Z-100. -s -- Copyright 2000, All rights reserved. Peter Seebach / seebs@plethora.net C/Unix wizard, Pro-commerce radical, Spam fighter. Boycott Spamazon! Consulting & Computers: http://www.plethora.net/ Get paid to surf! No spam. http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=GZX636 ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Organization: D Bit, Troy, NY From: wilson@dbit.com (John Wilson) NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: dbit.dbit.com Message-ID: <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> Date: 18 May 2000 19:04:22 -0400 X-Trace: 18 May 2000 19:04:22 -0400, dbit.dbit.com Lines: 14 XPident: wilson X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.181.141.3 XPident: news Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!unlisys!news.snafu.de!diablo.theplanet.net!peer.news.th.u-net.net!u-net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!newsfeed.wizvax.net!news.wizvax.net!dbit.com!wilson Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56699 In article , Kragen Sitaker wrote: >The TCFS guys at MIT have a bunch of 7-track backup tapes from the >early 1970s they wanted to read in 1995 (in order to transfer the data >to a more modern medium). I thought I recalled that Tom Knight was >going to build a 7-track tape drive for them, but I can't find a >reference to that on the Web, so maybe I am misremembering. I thought I heard that the MIT folks actually saved one of their old 7-track drives and "all" they needed to do was build a controller for it. Could be wrong. John Wilson D Bit ###### Sender: meissner@tiktok.cygnus.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> From: Michael Meissner Message-ID: Organization: Cygnus Solutions, A Red Hat company. Lines: 29 X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Date: 18 May 2000 19:22:19 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.192.197.34 X-Complaints-To: abuse@shore.net X-Trace: news.shore.net 958692176 209.192.197.34 (Thu, 18 May 2000 19:22:56 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 19:22:56 EDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.shore.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56638 kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes: > In article <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se>, > Johnny Billquist wrote: > >Try early '80s. Well, 7-track anyway. I guess you can still find 9-track > >tapes if you care to. They do exist with SCSI. I very much doubt you'll > >find any 7-track tape drives around. They went out of fashion before > >the IBM PC were invented, and I don't think anyone ever have considered > >attaching one. Which means you'll have to build your own interface > >as well. > > The TCFS guys at MIT have a bunch of 7-track backup tapes from the > early 1970s they wanted to read in 1995 (in order to transfer the data > to a more modern medium). I thought I recalled that Tom Knight was > going to build a 7-track tape drive for them, but I can't find a > reference to that on the Web, so maybe I am misremembering. I do recall at one point hearing that they were copying the old ITS backup tapes and that they had literally 1 shot at getting the data (ie, the tapes were self-destructing as being read, and bits literally falling off the tape). IIRC, the reason for this was provide some evidence for prior use in a patent case (my memory says it was the XOR graphics patent, but I'm probably misremembering). -- Michael Meissner, Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company. PMB 198, 174 Littleton Road #3, Westford, Massachusetts 01886, USA Work: meissner@redhat.com phone: +1 978-486-9304 Non-work: meissner@spectacle-pond.org fax: +1 978-692-4482 ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 44 Message-ID: <0h%U4.11002$nm6.126033@news-east.usenetserver.com> X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 19:46:04 EDT Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 23:46:04 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56670 In article , Michael Meissner wrote: >kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes: >> The TCFS guys at MIT have a bunch of 7-track backup tapes from the >> early 1970s they wanted to read in 1995 (in order to transfer the data >> to a more modern medium). I thought I recalled that Tom Knight was >> going to build a 7-track tape drive for them, but I can't find a >> reference to that on the Web, so maybe I am misremembering. > >I do recall at one point hearing that they were copying the old ITS backup >tapes and that they had literally 1 shot at getting the data (ie, the tapes >were self-destructing as being read, and bits literally falling off the tape). >IIRC, the reason for this was provide some evidence for prior use in a patent >case (my memory says it was the XOR graphics patent, but I'm probably >misremembering). There were a number of tapes that did flake apart as they were being read (perhaps a magnetic force microscope would have been a better tool than a tape drive for reading these tapes?), but some of them actually became more readable after flaking. Turns out that, in some cases, the flaking oxide was stuff stuck to the back of the tape --- that had been peeled off the layer of tape underneath it. There were several reasons given for the TCFS project in the thesis; prior patent art is one, historical search is another (Phil Agre wanted to know when the word "foo" came into use among the hackers), and "I want my thesis" is a third. I've heard that, indeed, the self-destruction problem is a problem with many tapes. I'd think that, in principle, you could recover 800bpi data from a pile of 1/8"-diameter metal oxide flakes, but I would expect it to be difficult in practice. (Once I scratched the backing off a classified CD-R in the course of marking it "ruined". Oops, that was dumb. Now there's classified data flakes all over the classified carpet, which unfortunately gets cleaned with an unclassified vacuum cleaner. Everyone assured me there was nothing to worry about --- not least since we declassified a successful copy of the same CD a few hours later --- but I felt really dumb.) -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### From: Timothy Stark Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <39244DB2.2A2AA06A@GCE.com> User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.14 (i686)) Lines: 14 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 22:25:15 CDT Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv2-oJ1dF8r88VW1GLw64sKkkH4aPAGKDwl56vzEMiYW8TKo62Mwv29t43N8t27tqUxjIukjTZP7WAvEMyl!aHHODKSCCbLT1iS1Ue3f5SK0KEM= X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 03:25:15 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.giganews.com!news6.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56637 In alt.sys.pdp10 Glenn C. Everhart wrote: > So does there exist a freely available pdp10 emulator anywhere? > Even incomplete? I still am working on it but I have some problems with it. -- Tim Stark -- Timothy Stark <>< Inet: sword7@speakeasy.org, sword7@firesword7.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------- "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Amen." -- John 3:16 (King James Version Bible) ###### From: Charles Richmond Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 22:12:17 -0700 Organization: Cannine Computer Center Lines: 34 Message-ID: <3924CD32.2CDEC2C1@dallas.net> References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Reply-To: richmond@dallas.net X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!newsfeed.rhein-neckar.de!news.rhein-neckar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!blackbush.xlink.net!howland.erols.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!feeder.qis.net!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56685 Michael Meissner wrote: > > kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes: > > > In article <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se>, > > Johnny Billquist wrote: > > >Try early '80s. Well, 7-track anyway. I guess you can still find 9-track > > >tapes if you care to. They do exist with SCSI. I very much doubt you'll > > >find any 7-track tape drives around. They went out of fashion before > > >the IBM PC were invented, and I don't think anyone ever have considered > > >attaching one. Which means you'll have to build your own interface > > >as well. > > > > The TCFS guys at MIT have a bunch of 7-track backup tapes from the > > early 1970s they wanted to read in 1995 (in order to transfer the data > > to a more modern medium). I thought I recalled that Tom Knight was > > going to build a 7-track tape drive for them, but I can't find a > > reference to that on the Web, so maybe I am misremembering. > > I do recall at one point hearing that they were copying the old ITS backup > tapes and that they had literally 1 shot at getting the data (ie, the tapes > were self-destructing as being read, and bits literally falling off the tape). > IIRC, the reason for this was provide some evidence for prior use in a patent > case (my memory says it was the XOR graphics patent, but I'm probably > misremembering). > Hey, Tim Shoppa should get in touch with Tom Knight and see if he could help out. Who knows...he might end up with more PDP-10 stuff for his trailing-edge site...that way we *all* would benefit! -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Charles and Francis Richmond | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ ###### From: Lord Apollyon Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Organization: Acheron, Ninth Plane of HELL References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC) X-Face: +R?|:[#c]/]%9L16(Tb"7xV9bSxxWpDG,?X^r X-Warning: Spammers will be disconnected, disembowelled, and eternally damned, in that order. Message-ID: Lines: 40 Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:32:04 +1000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.37.166.137 X-Complaints-To: abuse@telstra.net X-Trace: nsw.nnrp.telstra.net 958721524 203.37.166.137 (Fri, 19 May 2000 17:32:04 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:32:04 EST Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!intgwpad.nntp.telstra.net!nsw.nnrp.telstra.net!i-liquify-spammers-May2000 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56658 In article <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com>, Tim Shoppa wrote: > A good number of the emulator (simulator?) authors are a bit afraid > that releasing their current source code would require that they > support it. I'm of the other opinion - if they release their > current source code (I don't care if it's GPL or not GPL, I do > *not* want to get into that religious war!) then others will support > it. This may be way off-topic, and a rant out of left field... for that I'm sorry. I was perusing looking for a PDP/11 emulator - and I seem to have stumbled upon the quest for the Lost City of Gold.... Not only are all of the DECENT ones commercial, they're F*(!@*# thousands of dollars per copy. One obnoxious software I won't mention even brags about how cheap they are and then has the gonads to mention their US$2,000+ price tag. What's the deal here, folks? Nostalgia ain't worth $2k, but what I wanna know is who is PAYING that kind of price? I mean, these greedy dudes don't seem out of business yet - so SOMEONE is willingly taking the knife in the chest (repeatedly) for these pieces of software. How annoying. I'd love to see a PDP-10 emulator, but it's of personal/nostalgic interest only. If the author is expecting a quick-buck out of it, he can find something else. =Rob= -- The reply-to-address is *REAL* and will expire on 12:01AM 1-June-2000. Spammers: You will lose your network access. Guaranteed. 121 domains, 402 web-accounts, and 616 dialup ISP accounts flushed. ###### From: glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 19 May 2000 13:18:48 GMT Organization: IBM Austin Lines: 34 Message-ID: <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> Reply-To: wa4qal@vnet.ibm.com NNTP-Posting-Host: glass2.cv.lexington.ibm.com X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!an02.austin.ibm.com!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56648 In <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net>, wilson@dbit.com (John Wilson) writes: >In article , >Kragen Sitaker wrote: >>The TCFS guys at MIT have a bunch of 7-track backup tapes from the >>early 1970s they wanted to read in 1995 (in order to transfer the data >>to a more modern medium). I thought I recalled that Tom Knight was >>going to build a 7-track tape drive for them, but I can't find a >>reference to that on the Web, so maybe I am misremembering. > >I thought I heard that the MIT folks actually saved one of their old 7-track >drives and "all" they needed to do was build a controller for it. Could >be wrong. > >John Wilson >D Bit I think I remember that discussion, although I don't remember hearing the outcome. If I'm remembering correctly, one of the problems was that even finding heads for 7 track tapes was becoming impossible. I also remember hearing that certain government agencies (e.g., NASA) had an extensive collection of tapes that may be unreadable, either due to oxide decay, magnetic decay, or just due to a lack of drives. Is this an area that the PC industry will be facing in a few years, too? How many people can still read the 8-inch floppies that were popular in the late 70s? For that matter, how many people can still read the 5.25-inch floppies that were popular up until a few years ago? How much longer will the media survive before the oxide starts flaking off? Dave P.S. Standard Disclaimer: I work for them, but I don't speak for them. ###### From: glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 19 May 2000 13:25:47 GMT Organization: IBM Austin Lines: 52 Message-ID: <8g3fcr$1g0c$2@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> References: <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <0h%U4.11002$nm6.126033@news-east.usenetserver.com> Reply-To: wa4qal@vnet.ibm.com NNTP-Posting-Host: glass2.cv.lexington.ibm.com X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!portc03.blue.aol.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!an02.austin.ibm.com!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56645 In <0h%U4.11002$nm6.126033@news-east.usenetserver.com>, kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes: > >There were a number of tapes that did flake apart as they were being >read (perhaps a magnetic force microscope would have been a better tool >than a tape drive for reading these tapes?), but some of them actually >became more readable after flaking. Turns out that, in some cases, the >flaking oxide was stuff stuck to the back of the tape --- that had been >peeled off the layer of tape underneath it. > >There were several reasons given for the TCFS project in the thesis; >prior patent art is one, historical search is another (Phil Agre wanted >to know when the word "foo" came into use among the hackers), and "I >want my thesis" is a third. > >I've heard that, indeed, the self-destruction problem is a problem with >many tapes. I'd think that, in principle, you could recover 800bpi >data from a pile of 1/8"-diameter metal oxide flakes, but I would >expect it to be difficult in practice. > >(Once I scratched the backing off a classified CD-R in the course of >marking it "ruined". Oops, that was dumb. Now there's classified data >flakes all over the classified carpet, which unfortunately gets cleaned >with an unclassified vacuum cleaner. Everyone assured me there was >nothing to worry about --- not least since we declassified a successful >copy of the same CD a few hours later --- but I felt really dumb.) >-- > Kragen Sitaker >The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! > >The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) It's a good thing you didn't incinerate the CD. Just think of all of that classified smoke! :*) I once had the pleasure of declassifying a 3420 style tape. Do anyone realize how long it takes use a pair of scissors to chop the tape into small segments? Does anyone realize exactly how much tape is on one of those reels? Does anyone realize how huge of a pile of tape clippings result when you're finished? (Hint, it wouldn't fit in a trash can!) :*) Oh, another interesting fact about tapes is that some of them are electrically conductive. Apparently, this is to prevent static charges from building up. Thus, it wouldn't be a good idea to use one to fly a kite with around power lines (Well, so much for one alternative use for old tapes.). Dave P.S. Standard Disclaimer: I work for them, but I don't speak for them. ###### From: Art Rice Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Reply-To: arice@ue.itug.org Message-ID: References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 45 Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 13:41:02 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.94.112.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: typhoon.tampabay.rr.com 958743662 24.94.112.2 (Fri, 19 May 2000 09:41:02 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 09:41:02 EDT Organization: RoadRunner - TampaBay Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!cyclone-southeast.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!typhoon.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56661 On 19 May 2000 13:18:48 GMT, glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com wrote: >In <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net>, wilson@dbit.com (John Wilson) writes: >>In article , >>Kragen Sitaker wrote: >>>The TCFS guys at MIT have a bunch of 7-track backup tapes from the >>>early 1970s they wanted to read in 1995 (in order to transfer the data >>>to a more modern medium). I thought I recalled that Tom Knight was >>>going to build a 7-track tape drive for them, but I can't find a >>>reference to that on the Web, so maybe I am misremembering. >> >>I thought I heard that the MIT folks actually saved one of their old 7-track >>drives and "all" they needed to do was build a controller for it. Could >>be wrong. >> >>John Wilson >>D Bit > >I think I remember that discussion, although I don't remember hearing the >outcome. If I'm remembering correctly, one of the problems was that even >finding heads for 7 track tapes was becoming impossible. > >I also remember hearing that certain government agencies (e.g., NASA) had >an extensive collection of tapes that may be unreadable, either due to >oxide decay, magnetic decay, or just due to a lack of drives. > >Is this an area that the PC industry will be facing in a few years, too? >How many people can still read the 8-inch floppies that were popular in >the late 70s? For that matter, how many people can still read the 5.25-inch >floppies that were popular up until a few years ago? How much longer will >the media survive before the oxide starts flaking off? > >Dave > >P.S. Standard Disclaimer: I work for them, but I don't speak for them. Thanks. You just reminded me to install one of my old 5 1/4 drives in the new PC temporarily to save some of that old DOS 2.11 software. -- Art Rice *# Special Data Processing Corporation -------------------------------------- All opinions expressed are mine and do not reflect the views of my employer. ###### Message-ID: <392514ED.3152B08C@trailing-edge.com> Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 10:18:21 -0400 From: Tim Shoppa Organization: Trailing Edge Technology X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.03Gold (X11; I; OpenVMS V7.0 DEC 3000 Model 300L) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 65 NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.73.218.130 X-Trace: reader3.news.uu.net 958745903 19931 63.73.218.130 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!newsfeed.rhein-neckar.de!news.rhein-neckar.de!newsfeed.ision.net!ision!skynet.be!newsfeed2.news.nl.uu.net!sun4nl!ams.uu.net!ffx.uu.net!spool0.news.uu.net!reader3.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56622 glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com wrote: > I also remember hearing that certain government agencies (e.g., NASA) had > an extensive collection of tapes that may be unreadable, either due to > oxide decay, magnetic decay, or just due to a lack of drives. Many of the older NASA tapes are analog recordings of telemetry information. The drives are usually highly specialized, and the data formats not necessarily standardized. Often after the tape is read, it takes a lot of archaeology to determine what the recovered data actually means. > Is this an area that the PC industry will be facing in a few years, too? > How many people can still read the 8-inch floppies that were popular in > the late 70s? For that matter, how many people can still read the 5.25-inch > floppies that were popular up until a few years ago? How much longer will > the media survive before the oxide starts flaking off? I regularly read 1/2" tapes of several types, 14" disk packs of several varieties, 8" floppies, and 5.25" floppies for my customers. On the oldest 8" floppies (from the early 70's, often straight from true-blue 3740's), the oxide does flake off, quickly enough that frequent head cleanings are required but not quickly enough that there's any difficulty in reading the data off. 1/2" tapes can be a more "sticky" problem. Many manufacturers of tapes, especially in the mid-80's, were using a binder that under less-than-ideal storage conditions turns to a sticky goo. Even then, there's usually no problem reading the entire tape in the first pass with some equipment here that never stops the tape or does backspacing. If the problem is particularly bad, there are lubrication and baking techniques available. What does surprise my customers is how many "old media" disks or tapes they can fit on a single CD. For instance, about 2500 8" floppies can comfortably fit on a single CD-ROM. Depending on the tape density, length, and format, often several hundred 1/2" tapes will fit on a single CD. For examples, see the freeware collections of old (up to 4 decades old) DECUS PDP-10 and PDP-11 software I distribute through http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/freeware.html Each of the freeware CD's has material from hundreds or thousands of input tapes, floppies, paper tapes, and DECTapes. The lifetime of a CD is another issue. I use Kodak Gold CD-R's for one-off copies of data going to customers, and Kodak projects lifetimes for these of 100 years. CD's and readers are ubiquitous enough today that I expect compatible readers to be available new several decades from now, just as vinyl turntables are still available new today and will be for some time. At some point in the future they'll probably be archived to a better, denser medium, but for now CD (either CD-R or pressed) is almost always the best choice. Other options for very-long term storage are high-quality paper and photographic film; these have proven archival lives, if processed and stored properly, of over a hundred years. -- Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa@trailing-edge.com Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/ 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917 Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927 ###### From: jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx (Jay Maynard) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <0h%U4.11002$nm6.126033@news-east.usenetserver.com> <8g3fcr$1g0c$2@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> Reply-To: jmaynard@texas.net Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.4 (UNIX) Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 10:31:06 CDT Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv2-56UwZcd64F17RJrJK0FAKrAhcNo5MFho0rLbLnV9QmXbNKKqB+g3JIMpVmLv6aBa2u5XWLcq5UjIvkj!dLv/Mm3UBjBfXY+/d/RoKw== X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 15:31:06 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.giganews.com!news6.giganews.com.POSTED!jmaynard Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56705 On 19 May 2000 13:25:47 GMT, glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com wrote: >I once had the pleasure of declassifying a 3420 style tape. Do >anyone realize how long it takes use a pair of scissors to chop the >tape into small segments? Does anyone realize exactly how much tape >is on one of those reels? Does anyone realize how huge of a pile of >tape clippings result when you're finished? (Hint, it wouldn't fit >in a trash can!) :*) Cutting 2400 feet of tape into little bitty bits is a job for a shredder. Stick pencil through center, suspend above shredder, stick leader into slot, turn on shredder, stand back as shredder pulls tape through. (At least, that's how I'd approach the job...you need a good cross-cut shredder, though, or else you wind up with two or three 2400-foot-long strips of tape.) ###### From: "George R. Gonzalez" Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:09:46 -0500 Organization: University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus Lines: 20 Message-ID: <8g3pon$9m2$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> References: <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <0h%U4.11002$nm6.126033@news-east.usenetserver.com> <8g3fcr$1g0c$2@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> X-Trace: laurel.tc.umn.edu 958753367 9922 134.84.134.102 (19 May 2000 16:22:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@laurel.tc.umn.edu X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!skynet.be!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!hardy.tc.umn.edu!laurel.tc.umn.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56709 Jay Maynard wrote in message ... >Cutting 2400 feet of tape into little bitty bits is a job for a shredder. >Stick pencil through center, suspend above shredder, stick leader into slot, >turn on shredder, stand back as shredder pulls tape through. > >(At least, that's how I'd approach the job...you need a good cross-cut >shredder, though, or else you wind up with two or three 2400-foot-long >strips of tape.) Which makes me wonder-- does the CIA have a program that can reassemble shredded documents? Just scan in the shreds and set a Cray to work on it! (Or maybe it would be cheaper to hire people to reassemble the shreds). ###### From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 19 May 2000 16:22:31 GMT Organization: TSS Inc. Lines: 13 Message-ID: <8g3po7$2djm$1@citadel.in.taronga.com> References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: citadel.in.taronga.com X-Trace: citadel.in.taronga.com 958753351 79478 10.0.0.43 (19 May 2000 16:22:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@taronga.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2000 16:22:31 GMT X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-proxy.baileynm.com!citadel.in.taronga.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56642 In article , Lord Apollyon wrote: >Nostalgia ain't worth $2k, but what I wanna know is who is PAYING that >kind of price? People who are still running PDP-11-based control systems. Mentec is still shipping the things, remember... -- Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC. "The only thing worse than X is every other GUI in common usage today." -- Chris Rovers ###### From: albaugh@agames.com (Mike Albaugh) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Followup-To: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Date: 19 May 2000 17:16:10 GMT Organization: Atari Games Corporation Lines: 45 Message-ID: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> References: <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: java.agames.com X-Trace: null.agames.com 958756570 17638 192.245.83.156 (19 May 2000 17:16:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@agames.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2000 17:16:10 GMT X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!uni-erlangen.de!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!newshub1.kdd1.nap.home.ne.jp!news.home.ne.jp!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!newshub1.home.com!news.home.com!newshub1-work.home.com!null!albaugh Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56706 glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com wrote: : I also remember hearing that certain government agencies (e.g., NASA) had : an extensive collection of tapes that may be unreadable, either due to : oxide decay, magnetic decay, or just due to a lack of drives. : Is this an area that the PC industry will be facing in a few years, too? : How many people can still read the 8-inch floppies that were popular in : the late 70s? Well, I still have a few 8-inch drives, and a controller that can connect to an Atari-800 (Or any machine with a serial-port and the needed software). But I don't know if the disks themselves are still readable, even with "good" drives. : For that matter, how many people can still read the 5.25-inch : floppies that were popular up until a few years ago? They are/were lower density than 8-inch and 3.5-inch, so the media _might_ last a bit longer. OTOH, 5.25-inch drives and disk were definitely "lowest bidder" stuff, so I wouldn't bet a lot on them. : How much longer will : the media survive before the oxide starts flaking off? I doubt that the media is your biggest problem. I have files, er _documents_ that I faithfully copied from floppy to hard-drive to Zip disk. The bits are fine, but no current software can "decode" the meaning of those bits, and I don't have an old-enough computer to run the old software. Which is to say: PC (and MAC) users should worry more about the near-term "destruction" of their documents by careless app- writers than the bit-rot itself. Not that I'm suggesting you _not_ save the bits, especially since storage media is so much cheaper per bit these days, but if you ever need the _information_ from those bits, you may have to pay a bundle to get it. Note that with the DMCA and UCITA, it may be _illegal_ for you to hire someone to decrypt your old docs for you, but that's another flame-war :-) Mike | albaugh@agames.com, speaking only for msyelf ###### From: aek@spies.com (Al Kossow) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 10:53:31 -0700 Organization: Apple Computer, Inc. Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: haxrus.apple.com X-Trace: news.apple.com 958758809 23891 17.205.21.66 (19 May 2000 17:53:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.apple.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2000 17:53:29 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!forum.apple.com!news.apple.com!haxrus.apple.com!user Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56628 In article <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com>, albaugh@agames.com (Mike Albaugh) wrote: > The bits are fine, but no current > software can "decode" the meaning of those bits, and I don't > have an old-enough computer to run the old software. Assuming the application isn't timing critial, a simulation of the system might work. Anyone working on archiving information on the format of documents created by these older apps? -- The eBay Curse: "May you find everything you're looking for.." ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <0h%U4.11002$nm6.126033@news-east.usenetserver.com> <8g3fcr$1g0c$2@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 34 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 15:24:40 EDT Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 19:24:40 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56694 In article <8g3fcr$1g0c$2@ausnews.austin.ibm.com>, wrote: >In <0h%U4.11002$nm6.126033@news-east.usenetserver.com>, kragen@dnaco.net >(Kragen Sitaker) writes: >>(Once I scratched the backing off a classified CD-R in the course of >>marking it "ruined". Oops, that was dumb. Now there's classified data >>flakes all over the classified carpet, which unfortunately gets cleaned >>with an unclassified vacuum cleaner. Everyone assured me there was >>nothing to worry about --- not least since we declassified a successful >>copy of the same CD a few hours later --- but I felt really dumb.) > >It's a good thing you didn't incinerate the CD. Just think of all >of that classified smoke! :*) My worry was that the flakes were big enough that you could probably, in principle, recover the entire contents of the CD given enough flakes (and a holographic scanner like Holomapper with which to scan them). Smoke would be fine --- the pits and lands would disappear in the high heat, and each smoke particle would contain less than a bit anyway, so reassembling the CD data would be impossible even if you could scan every smoke particle. >I once had the pleasure of declassifying a 3420 style tape. Do >anyone realize how long it takes use a pair of scissors to chop the >tape into small segments? How many bits per inch were on these tapes? How many bits were on each segment? -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8g3fcr$1g0c$2@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8g3pon$9m2$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 14 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 15:25:45 EDT Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 19:25:45 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!howland.erols.net!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56695 In article <8g3pon$9m2$1@laurel.tc.umn.edu>, George R. Gonzalez wrote: >Which makes me wonder-- does the CIA have a program that can reassemble >shredded documents? Just scan in the shreds and set a Cray to work on it! > >(Or maybe it would be cheaper to hire people to reassemble the shreds). I've speculated on this. I don't think you'd need a Cray; a K6-2 would probably be fine. -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: mbg@world.std.com (Megan) Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 18:13:57 GMT References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Lines: 27 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.umass.edu!world!mbg Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56737 Lord Apollyon writes: >Nostalgia ain't worth $2k, but what I wanna know is who is PAYING that >kind of price? I mean, these greedy dudes don't seem out of business >yet - so SOMEONE is willingly taking the knife in the chest (repeatedly) >for these pieces of software. What you fail to realize is that there are still MANY companies who continue to use pdp-11 software. And for that, they need machines. Well, PCs are a commodity item nowadays... they're really cheap. Since a pdp-11 had a larger initial cost, plus the cost of maintaining it, spending $2k for a *very good emulator* which can run all the old code can be a real win and not, as you mention, taking a knife in the chest. Megan Gentry Former RT-11 Developer +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ | Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com | | Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com | | Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' | | 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ | | Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler | | (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg KB1FCA | +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ ###### From: bill_h Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 12:48:26 -0700 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Lines: 24 Message-ID: <39259A8A.201C@azstarnet.com> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> Reply-To: bill_h@azstarnet.com X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!howland.erols.net!news-out.transit.remarq.com.MISMATCH!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56730 glass2@glass2.lexington.ibm.com wrote: > Is this an area that the PC industry will be facing in a few years, too? > How many people can still read the 8-inch floppies that were popular in > the late 70s? For that matter, how many people can still read the 5.25-inch > floppies that were popular up until a few years ago? How much longer will > the media survive before the oxide starts flaking off? > > Dave Well, I can. I've just been going through bunches of ~1980 floppies, looking for interesting programs to throw in with a couple Kaypro's I'm about to 'release'.... and it's amazing to me that virtually every disk so far is prefectly readable. 'Course I've kept them in pretty temperate storage, and very low (naturally) humidity, but I consider this failure rate astounding. I've seen more errors from crappy disks, usually showing up within days or weeks back in 1980, than what I'm seeing now. In other words, disks that were 'solid' after a couple months seem to last YEARS...... Bill Tucson, AZ ###### From: albaugh@agames.com (Mike Albaugh) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Followup-To: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Date: 19 May 2000 20:06:12 GMT Organization: Atari Games Corporation Lines: 38 Message-ID: <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> References: <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: java.agames.com X-Trace: null.agames.com 958766772 9654 192.245.83.156 (19 May 2000 20:06:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@agames.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2000 20:06:12 GMT X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!newshub1.home.com!news.home.com!newshub1-work.home.com!null!albaugh Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56741 Al Kossow (aek@spies.com) wrote: : In article <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com>, albaugh@agames.com (Mike : Albaugh) wrote: : > The bits are fine, but no current : > software can "decode" the meaning of those bits, and I don't : > have an old-enough computer to run the old software. : Assuming the application isn't timing critial, a simulation of : the system might work. Ah, but while a simulation of the _documented_ behavior of an older systems is _challenging_, the simulation of the _actual_ behavior could be a Herculean task. My personal epiphany was when I read the announcement of the Amdahl 470. It was described as completely complying with the System 360 architectural specification with one exception. That being that if a "transfer in channel" command had a bad target address (leapt off into hyperspace) the resulting error-trap would store not the address of the bad TIC, but the (bad) target-address where it tried to land. The pamphlet explained that they did that because it was what a _real_ 360 actually did. :-) : Anyone working on archiving information on the format of documents : created by these older apps? Assuming, of course, that the required information is legal to know. Read the EULA :-) (no, IANAL, but prudence suggests that people who can read proprietary file formats might keep a pretty low profile, at least as long as the original corporation or some successor with a few idle lawyers is around... :-) Yeah. the above is paranoid. It was stated for emphasis. The _gist_ of my argument is that I feel that "dead langauges" are at least as much a threat to old documents as media-rot is. Mike | albaugh@agames.com, speaking only for myself ###### From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 19 May 2000 20:41:13 GMT Organization: TSS Inc. Lines: 16 Message-ID: <8g48t9$2n7f$1@citadel.in.taronga.com> References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: citadel.in.taronga.com X-Trace: citadel.in.taronga.com 958768873 89327 10.0.0.43 (19 May 2000 20:41:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@taronga.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2000 20:41:13 GMT X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-proxy.baileynm.com!citadel.in.taronga.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56762 In article <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com>, Mike Albaugh wrote: > Yeah. the above is paranoid. It was stated for emphasis. >The _gist_ of my argument is that I feel that "dead langauges" >are at least as much a threat to old documents as media-rot is. CP/Mulator, Bochs, Ersatz-11, copies of old CP/M boot disks, MS-DOS 2.1, etc... you don't need to reverse engineer the file formats if you can run the original software in an emulator. This means that if you have old copies of the applications, save them as well as their data! -- Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC. "The only thing worse than X is every other GUI in common usage today." -- Chris Rovers ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 32 Message-ID: <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:17:55 EDT Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 21:17:55 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!portc03.blue.aol.com!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!63.211.125.72!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56722 In article <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com>, Mike Albaugh wrote: > Assuming, of course, that the required information is legal >to know. Read the EULA :-) (no, IANAL, but prudence suggests that >people who can read proprietary file formats might keep a pretty >low profile, at least as long as the original corporation or some >successor with a few idle lawyers is around... :-) Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know, reverse engineering is protected by case law, and reading proprietary file formats is a big industry. (Companies like Access Data make a lot of money even breaking encryption built into proprietary file formats.) Most free countries have similar protections written into their law. That doesn't mean nobody will try to sue you. It just means they will lose. Where do you live? Singapore? Myanmar? > Yeah. the above is paranoid. It was stated for emphasis. >The _gist_ of my argument is that I feel that "dead langauges" >are at least as much a threat to old documents as media-rot is. There's definitely a threat there. But scary paragraphs like the one you posted above will make it worse by discouraging people from recovering documents in those dead languages. -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### From: David Scheidt Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 19 May 2000 21:26:47 GMT Organization: EnterAct Corp. Lines: 22 Message-ID: <8g4bin$mbm$1@news.enteract.com> References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell-2.enteract.com X-Trace: news.enteract.com 958771607 22902 207.229.143.41 (19 May 2000 21:26:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@enteract.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2000 21:26:47 GMT User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.3-STABLE (i386)) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.enteract.com!betanews.enteract.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56757 In alt.sys.pdp10 Kragen Sitaker wrote: : In article <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com>, : Mike Albaugh wrote: :> Assuming, of course, that the required information is legal :>to know. Read the EULA :-) (no, IANAL, but prudence suggests that :>people who can read proprietary file formats might keep a pretty :>low profile, at least as long as the original corporation or some :>successor with a few idle lawyers is around... :-) : Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know, reverse engineering : is protected by case law, and reading proprietary file formats is a big : industry. (Companies like Access Data make a lot of money even : breaking encryption built into proprietary file formats.) Unfortunatly, there are efforts afoot to change this. Its absolutely, incredibly stupid, but it's still happening. And it looks like it is going to succeed! -- dscheidt@enteract.com Ketchup, therefore, shows both thixotropic and pseudoplastic rheological properties. -- John Schmitt, in AFU ###### From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 19 May 2000 21:40:41 GMT Organization: TSS Inc. Lines: 13 Message-ID: <8g4ccp$2pb6$1@citadel.in.taronga.com> References: <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: citadel.in.taronga.com X-Trace: citadel.in.taronga.com 958772441 91494 10.0.0.43 (19 May 2000 21:40:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@taronga.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2000 21:40:41 GMT X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!headwall.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-proxy.baileynm.com!citadel.in.taronga.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56763 In article <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com>, Kragen Sitaker wrote: >Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know, reverse engineering >is protected by case law, and reading proprietary file formats is a big >industry. Recent laws like the Digital Millenium Copyright Act are tryingto change that. -- Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC. "The only thing worse than X is every other GUI in common usage today." -- Chris Rovers ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <39244DB2.2A2AA06A@GCE.com> Organization: a user of Best Internet Communications, Inc. www.best.com From: falconer@best.com (Edward A. Falk) Date: 19 May 2000 22:17:04 GMT Lines: 19 Message-ID: <3925bd60$0$219@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ba.best.com X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 958774624 219 falconer@206.184.139.134 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news2.best.com!news3.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56742 In article , Timothy Stark wrote: >In alt.sys.pdp10 Glenn C. Everhart wrote: >> So does there exist a freely available pdp10 emulator anywhere? >> Even incomplete? > >I still am working on it but I have some problems with it. Hot damn; keep us posted. What devices have you done so far? It's been ~20 years since I last touched a pdp-10, so I don't know if I'd be of any help to you. Do you want a GUI front panel like on Doug Jones' pdp-8 emulator? I could do that. -- -ed falk, falk@falconer.vip.best.com. See *********************#*************#* http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!**** and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#** to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW**** ###### From: "Zane H. Healy" Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc References: <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <39244DB2.2A2AA06A@GCE.com> <3925bd60$0$219@nntp1.ba.best.com> Organization: Aracnet User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990624 ("Dawnrazor") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.14 (i686)) Lines: 24 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 00:34:40 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.99.193.21 X-Complaints-To: news@aracnet.com X-Trace: typhoon.aracnet.com 958782880 216.99.193.21 (Fri, 19 May 2000 17:34:40 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:34:40 PDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-feeder2.wcg.net!news-feeder.wcg.net!WCG!typhoon.aracnet.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56765 In alt.sys.pdp10 Edward A. Falk wrote: > In article , > Timothy Stark wrote: >>In alt.sys.pdp10 Glenn C. Everhart wrote: >>> So does there exist a freely available pdp10 emulator anywhere? >>> Even incomplete? >> >>I still am working on it but I have some problems with it. > Hot damn; keep us posted. What devices have you done so far? > It's been ~20 years since I last touched a pdp-10, so I don't > know if I'd be of any help to you. Do you want a GUI front > panel like on Doug Jones' pdp-8 emulator? I could do that. I've not seen, Doug Jones' emulator, but the PDP-8 emulator for the Mac is fantastic in the way it uses the GUI. Doing a graphical emulation of devices can make the emulator more intuitive (OK, I confess, it's also cool). An added advantage of having an emulated front panel is in trying to get an actual system up. I used the Mac emulator to figure out what to expect when I was working on restoring a PDP-8/m. Zane ###### From: Charles Richmond Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 02:50:37 -0700 Organization: Cannine Computer Center Lines: 22 Message-ID: <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> Reply-To: richmond@dallas.net X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news.he.net!news!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56723 Kragen Sitaker wrote: > > [snip..] [sinp...] [snip...] > > Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know, reverse engineering > is protected by case law, and reading proprietary file formats is a big > industry. (Companies like Access Data make a lot of money even > breaking encryption built into proprietary file formats.) > I used to think that too...then I heard about a law that makes it a crime to own a *schematic* of a blue box...or of a cable tv decoder. It is kind of like the law that allows them to arrest you for possessing burglary tools. I guess that there is *nothing* else except burlary that could be done with those tools, huh??? :-) Also, as holders of TOP SECRET clearances can tell you, there are things you know that are illegal to transmit to other people. -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Charles and Francis Richmond | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ ###### From: Charles Richmond Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 02:59:47 -0700 Organization: Cannine Computer Center Lines: 26 Message-ID: <39266212.C601CB07@dallas.net> References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> Reply-To: richmond@dallas.net X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!netnews.com!feeder.qis.net!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56716 Megan wrote: > > Lord Apollyon writes: > > >Nostalgia ain't worth $2k, but what I wanna know is who is PAYING that > >kind of price? I mean, these greedy dudes don't seem out of business > >yet - so SOMEONE is willingly taking the knife in the chest (repeatedly) > >for these pieces of software. > > What you fail to realize is that there are still MANY companies who > continue to use pdp-11 software. And for that, they need machines. > Well, PCs are a commodity item nowadays... they're really cheap. > Since a pdp-11 had a larger initial cost, plus the cost of maintaining > it, spending $2k for a *very good emulator* which can run all the > old code can be a real win and not, as you mention, taking a knife in > the chest. > But...these other PDP-11 emulator companies *could* offer a hobbyist license, as Mr. John Wilson does. That would *not* materially affect the money they are making with their software. So if they are *not* jerks, they are still *not* as nice as John... :-) -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Charles and Francis Richmond | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ ###### Message-ID: <3926CC04.CB20DA3E@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 34 NNTP-Posting-Host: async70-syd-isp-5.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958843909 203.101.5.71 (Sun, 21 May 2000 03:31:49 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 03:31:49 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 03:31:49 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56752 > attaching one. Which means you'll have to build your own interface > as well. > OK, Sounds reasonable... but I wouldn't know how to do it. If someone gave me the schematic diagram, I could make it. > > > If not, what extra unusual and rarely used (today) drives can I install ? > > There are lots of them, except I guess a PC might be problematic. > You could have paper tape, punch cards and DECtape for starters. Great! Thanks... anyone got those readers ? :) -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Message-ID: <3926D105.5FC86725@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <39216195_1@news.wizvax.net> <39213723.1D6B687@trailing-edge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 58 NNTP-Posting-Host: async70-syd-isp-5.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958845191 203.101.5.71 (Sun, 21 May 2000 03:53:11 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 03:53:11 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 03:53:10 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56748 Thanks Tim! I like the idea of using a floppy to store raw music. What we nee though, *IS* an audio recorder, that can utilise 5.25" floppies (1.2Mb) and store a minute or so of audio, or more, with some kind of non-digital MP3 compression ?? :) That way, bas sectors on track 0, or anywhere, won't make a disk completely unusable! :) Tim Shoppa wrote: > John Wilson wrote: > > > > In article , > > Terry Kennedy wrote: > > > To answer another poster: the 8" floppy was designed by IBM for micro- > > >code loads (IMPL) on mainframes - in particular, the S/370. Once they had > > >it, IBM used it in all sorts of unit record equipment like the keypunch > > >emulators you mentioned. > > > > I vaguely remember reading some story that floppy disks were actually invented > > by some crazy inventor type in Japan (???) in the 50s, for audio recording > > or something. IIRC IBM denies this is the case but paid the guy off anyway. > > Sound familiar to anyone? > > Not exactly in the right chronological order, but when cheap used 5.25" > floppies began flooding the surplus markets in the late 80's and > early 90's I bought some, hooked a UART and A/D and D/A coverters > up, and had 8-bit sound recording. There was a loud click every > rotation as the track was switched though, and at 5 or 6 rotations per > second I only got 7 seconds on a single-sided 5.25" floppy. > > (The drives I was using were Tandon TM-100's, I don't think I ever > got double sided operation working right with automatic head switching.) > > Just a little bit more primitive than MP3 players, but a whole > lot more fun :-). > > Tim. -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Message-ID: <3926D35A.4EF390A@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <958519342.614172@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 62 NNTP-Posting-Host: async70-syd-isp-5.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958845788 203.101.5.71 (Sun, 21 May 2000 04:03:08 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:03:08 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:03:07 +1000 X-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:03:09 EST (news.interact.net.au) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!newsfeed.rhein-neckar.de!news.rhein-neckar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!blackbush.xlink.net!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!intgwlon.nntp.telstra.net!intgwpad.nntp.telstra.net!nsw.nnrp.telstra.net!news.interact.net.au!newshost.pcug.org.au!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56746 Thanks guys. I could make my soft-sectored 8" FDD hard sectored, by installing an LED and a photodiode. But then I'd have to correctly interface it to the board in the drive. I'd also have to hunt down hard sectored disks! Or I could carefully punch holes in the ones I've got, to tell the drive where the sectors are supposed to go! 2.5", is that the size ? I've gotta get it! :) Is the Zenith and the Olympia the same type of floppy ? Anyway... at least this drive won't take up too much space, like the 8" will. And the LASERdisc player, and the RCA CED (Selectavision) player, and the VHS VCR, etc. that I hope to install!! :) Did a Kodak/Casio digital camera, from the early 90's use a non-standard FDD, built-in ? I seem to remember it did.... Thanks Don Stokes wrote: > In article , > Mario Klebsch wrote: > >The oposite extreme in size, I saw, were 2 1/2" floppies (or were they > >2"?). The floppy disk did not even have a closed case. I saw them in > >a typewriter made by Olympia. > > There were such things as 2.5" floppies, that looked a lot like shrunken > 3.5" floppies. Some early 90s Zenith laptops used them. > > I suspect that the reduction in storage wasn't justified by the utility > added by going smaller. A 3.5" floppy fits in a shirt pocket (which a > 5.25" floppy doesn't), and that's small enough. 8-) > > (Actually, I do have shirts with pockets that'll take a 5.25" floppy...) > > -- don -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Message-ID: <3926D56C.73E2F42F@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 40 NNTP-Posting-Host: async70-syd-isp-5.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958846318 203.101.5.71 (Sun, 21 May 2000 04:11:58 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:11:58 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:11:57 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!headwall.stanford.edu!feeder.via.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56751 > Well, I still have a few 8-inch drives, and a controller that > can connect to an Atari-800 (Or any machine with a serial-port and > the needed software). But I don't know if the disks themselves are > still readable, even with "good" drives. > > Mike > | albaugh@agames.com, speaking only for msyelf Great! I have a Mitsubishi 8" FDD. I looked into the feasability of making an interface for it. Or more like: wiring it up to a standard FDD controller for a PC, but I never took it further. I still have to provide the 28VDC (or whatever it is). So I know it's possible, but I've already got 2 FDDs, and a serial interface would be great! Where can I get one ? I'd mount it internally, and hope to be able to access the data from the 8" floppy, from the DOS prompt & Win95 Explorer. Thanks -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Message-ID: <3926D5C6.C628FC8E@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <392476f6_1@news.wizvax.net> <8g3evo$1g0c$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: async70-syd-isp-5.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958846407 203.101.5.71 (Sun, 21 May 2000 04:13:27 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:13:27 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:13:27 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56754 I HOPE we don't have these problems, of not being able to read old media!!!!!!!!!! Where I work. We throw out perfectly good 5.25" FDDs. Luckily, I save them, and take them home! -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!not-for-mail From: Neil Franklin Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 20 May 2000 22:14:17 +0200 Organization: My own Private Self Lines: 70 Message-ID: <6usnvdt1wm.fsf@chonsp.franklin.ch> References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: chonsp.franklin.ch X-Trace: chonsp.franklin.ch 958853661 726 10.0.3.2 (20 May 2000 20:14:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@chonsp.franklin.ch NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 May 2000 20:14:21 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56775 kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes: > In article <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com>, > Mike Albaugh wrote: > > Assuming, of course, that the required information is legal > >to know. Read the EULA :-) (no, IANAL, but prudence suggests that > >people who can read proprietary file formats might keep a pretty > >low profile, at least as long as the original corporation or some > >successor with a few idle lawyers is around... :-) > > Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know, reverse engineering > is protected by case law, Unless you are reverse engineering anything the owners lawyer can get a judge to regard as an copy prevention device. Then it is a violation of the DMCA (passed in 1998, active U.S. law since 2000.01.01). You hit that barrier real fast. Any license key system is copy prevention, and any old mini computer had part of such a system embedded (hardware serial number). From then on upwards it just lawyerly creativity in twisting facts... In fact unless the license of the software explicitely allows the licensee to decompile it, then any decompilation is illegal. And it is legal for the software to auto-delete itsself if it believes such an attempt is going on. And the manufacturer is not liable if the software erred in its "detection" when you were not decompiling. It has been argued that even decompiling viruses to generate signatures for anti-virus programs is strictly a DMCA violation! But luckily virus authors are not going to sue over that. Wellcome to the brave new world. > Most free countries have similar protections written into their law. Until the U.S. government notices that an DMCA that is limited to the U.S. can be circumvented by anyone outside, and bullies the others into following their "lead". > That doesn't mean nobody will try to sue you. It just means they will > lose. Assuming that you are capable of affording legal defense. Only 5 days ago a on-the-fly web page transformation site (it translated the text of any web page into an satirical style) shut down because the owner simply cannot afford to fight against Bank of Amarica who have threatend to sue him, if he does not make his program block people having BoAs site transformed. He claims that he has not enough time to hande a flood of such request, nor computer power to run such an growing block list. Apparently BoA is to stupid to simply block access to their site by his computer. (Quite what transforming a page has to do with copying is left as an exercise to the reader.) > Where do you live? Singapore? Myanmar? Me? Luckily not in the U.S. of Lawyers. -- Neil Franklin, neil@franklin.ch.remove http://neil.franklin.ch/ Nerd, Geek, Hacker, Unix Guru, Sysadmin, Roleplayer, LARPer, Mystic Use a WIMP (Windows Icons Mouse Pulldowns) interface - or get one with a CLUE (Command Line User Environment)? ###### Message-ID: <3926D953.97D7973F@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 50 NNTP-Posting-Host: async70-syd-isp-5.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958847317 203.101.5.71 (Sun, 21 May 2000 04:28:37 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:28:37 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:28:36 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56789 > Well, while technically not a floppy, there existed 14 inch removable platter > disks. Might be a bit hard to fit in a PC case, even a skyscraper one. > I've seen them. The disk packs, right? Sorry, a bit too big. > > But, if you accomplish that, then you can always aim toward fitting a > rotating drum memory (e.g., IBM 2305) into (err, onto?) it. > I think I've seen something like that on eBay, late last year. Sorry, too big. I could make my PC as big as a very small car, but it'd be too big then. > > If you accomplish either of these, I'm sure that quite a few of us would > appreciate pictures. > If I have ANYTHING to show, I'll be sure to post it on my web site. I will also inform all these mice people, who've shared many stories, and experiences - through this and related newsgroups. > > As for tapes, you could consider putting a mainframe style cartridge > tape drive in it (IBM 3480 style cartridges). I shall!! I don't know them, but I'll look into it. -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Message-ID: <3926D9ED.B6D24D25@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 77 NNTP-Posting-Host: async70-syd-isp-5.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958847471 203.101.5.71 (Sun, 21 May 2000 04:31:11 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:31:11 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:31:10 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!feeder.via.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56791 AAARGGHHHH!!! Imagine the momentum! ANd the gyroscopical force, it would impart on the people lifting it! It'd JUMP out of their hands, and pound itself into the floor, I'd imagine! Mike Yankus wrote: > wrote in message > news:8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com... > > In <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com>, Joshua > Hrouda writes: > > >Tim, or anyone else: > > >Hi. I'm making myself a PC, and I'm putting it in a 'skyscraper' case. > Which is a > > >modified full tower case. I may even start fom stractch, and build a new > one. > > > > > >I'm putting in ALL kinds of weird and unusual devices (mostly drives) in > it. > > >What's the biggest floppy ? (8", I've got, but I want bigger, if it > exists). > > >And what about tape drives, such as the 7-track & 9-track mentioned. > > >Are these the standard types, from the early 90's ? > > >If not, what extra unusual and rarely used (today) drives can I install ? > > > > > >Thanks heaps. > > > > > >-- > > >Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* > > > > > > Well, while technically not a floppy, there existed 14 inch removable > platter > > disks. Might be a bit hard to fit in a PC case, even a skyscraper one. > > > > But, if you accomplish that, then you can always aim toward fitting a > > rotating drum memory (e.g., IBM 2305) into (err, onto?) it. > > > > If you accomplish either of these, I'm sure that quite a few of us would > > appreciate pictures. > > > > As for tapes, you could consider putting a mainframe style cartridge > > tape drive in it (IBM 3480 style cartridges). > > > > Dave > > > > P.S. Standard Disclaimer: I work for them, but I don't speak for them. > > > > What indeed was the largest tape/disk peripheral devices ever built > (single tape, single spindle disk)? I have heard about drums that > had a horizontal axis and were several yards long. The rotational > momentum was something to worry about. I vaguely remember a horror > story about trying to move one of these things while it was spinning. > > Mike -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Message-ID: <3926DA91.976FF8D0@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8frg49$1fc0$1@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> <8fube9$hk1$1@reuters.plano.sterling.com> <39244DB2.2A2AA06A@GCE.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: async70-syd-isp-5.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 958847634 203.101.5.71 (Sun, 21 May 2000 04:33:54 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:33:54 EST Distribution: world Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 04:33:54 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56790 "Glenn C. Everhart" wrote: > So does there exist a freely available pdp10 emulator anywhere? > Even incomplete? Mate, can you keep ON TOPIC please ?? :) -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### From: nailed_barnacleSPAMFREE@hotmail.com (barnacle) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 21:23:37 GMT Organization: [posted via Easynet Ltd] Lines: 22 Distribution: world Message-ID: <8g6vpl$d30$1@quince.news.easynet.net> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <39216195_1@news.wizvax.net> <39213723.1D6B687@trailing-edge.com> <3926D105.5FC86725@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: nbarnes.easynet.co.uk X-Trace: quince.news.easynet.net 958857845 13408 194.154.98.206 (20 May 2000 21:24:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynet.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 May 2000 21:24:05 GMT X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!newsfeed.icl.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!news-hub.cableinet.net!easynet-tele!easynet.net!quince.news.easynet.net!egbert Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56804 In article <3926D105.5FC86725@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com>, Joshua Hrouda wrote: >Thanks Tim! > >I like the idea of using a floppy to store raw music. >What we nee though, *IS* an audio recorder, that can utilise 5.25" floppies > (1.2Mb) >and store a minute or so of audio, or more, with some kind of non-digital MP3 >compression ?? :) >That way, bas sectors on track 0, or anywhere, won't make a disk completely >unusable! :) > Broadcast companies like the Beeb have been using floppy disc recorders as a replacement for cartidge (continuous loop tape) players for years but 3.5" - 1.44, 2.88, and some obscure 10M discs. The data is compressed but I can't recall the scheme now - too long since I used them...aptx rings a bell. Since the 10M discs became unavailable, the current equivalent uses zips. -- barnacle http://www.nailed-barnacle.co.uk ###### From: Bruce Bergman Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Organization: A clean desk is a sure sign of a sick mind. Reply-To: blCHURRObergman@earthlink.net Message-ID: <0paeis8bk62e898oamrpq0niaqj38vs1ad@4ax.com> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <39216195_1@news.wizvax.net> <39213723.1D6B687@trailing-edge.com> <3926D105.5FC86725@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8g6vpl$d30$1@quince.news.easynet.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 00:27:25 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.179.129.130 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 958868845 209.179.129.130 (Sat, 20 May 2000 17:27:25 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 17:27:25 PDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!netnews.com!howland.erols.net!portc.blue.aol.com.MISMATCH!portc03.blue.aol.com!cyclone-east.rr.com!news.rr.com!news-east.rr.com!cyclone-west.rr.com!news.rr.com|news-west.rr.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56814 On Sat, 20 May 2000 21:23:37 GMT, nailed_barnacleSPAMFREE@hotmail.com (barnacle) wrote: >In article <3926D105.5FC86725@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com>, Joshua Hrouda wrote: >>Thanks Tim! >> >>I like the idea of using a floppy to store raw music. >>What we nee though, *IS* an audio recorder, that can utilise 5.25" floppies >>(1.2Mb) and store a minute or so of audio, or more, with some kind of >>non-digital MP3 compression ?? :) That way, bas sectors on track 0, >>or anywhere, won't make a disk completely unusable! :) > >Broadcast companies like the Beeb have been using floppy disc recorders as a >replacement for cartidge (continuous loop tape) players for years but 3.5" - >1.44, 2.88, and some obscure 10M discs. The data is compressed but I can't >recall the scheme now - too long since I used them...aptx rings a bell. Since >the 10M discs became unavailable, the current equivalent uses zips. In the USA, the new Cart Machines I've seen are Mini-Disc based, which seems like an ideal use for them. Random access, high capacity, low media cost, re-writable, no-noise optical storage. --<< Bruce >>-- -- Bruce L. Bergman blCHURRObergman@ NOearthSPAMlink.netEVER Remove the caps. Troubleshooter - Electrician, Phones, HVAC, Plumbing,... 'Current'ly with Westend Electric, Agoura, CA 818/889-9545 WARNING: No Unsolicited Commercial E-mail is EVER accepted. ###### From: nailed_barnacleSPAMFREE@hotmail.com (barnacle) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 05:10:16 GMT Organization: [posted via Easynet Ltd] Lines: 33 Message-ID: <8g7r5k$131j$1@quince.news.easynet.net> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <39216195_1@news.wizvax.net> <39213723.1D6B687@trailing-edge.com> <3926D105.5FC86725@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8g6vpl$d30$1@quince.news.easynet.net> <0paeis8bk62e898oamrpq0niaqj38vs1ad@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: nbarnes.easynet.co.uk X-Trace: quince.news.easynet.net 958885876 35891 194.154.98.206 (21 May 2000 05:11:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynet.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 May 2000 05:11:16 GMT X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!easynet-tele!easynet.net!quince.news.easynet.net!egbert Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56803 In article <0paeis8bk62e898oamrpq0niaqj38vs1ad@4ax.com>, blCHURRObergman@earthlink.net wrote: >On Sat, 20 May 2000 21:23:37 GMT, nailed_barnacleSPAMFREE@hotmail.com >(barnacle) wrote: >>In article <3926D105.5FC86725@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com>, Joshua > Hrouda wrote: >>>Thanks Tim! >>> >>>I like the idea of using a floppy to store raw music. >>>What we nee though, *IS* an audio recorder, that can utilise 5.25" floppies >>>(1.2Mb) and store a minute or so of audio, or more, with some kind of >>>non-digital MP3 compression ?? :) That way, bas sectors on track 0, >>>or anywhere, won't make a disk completely unusable! :) > >> >>Broadcast companies like the Beeb have been using floppy disc recorders as a >>replacement for cartidge (continuous loop tape) players for years but 3.5" - >>1.44, 2.88, and some obscure 10M discs. The data is compressed but I can't >>recall the scheme now - too long since I used them...aptx rings a bell. Since >>the 10M discs became unavailable, the current equivalent uses zips. > > In the USA, the new Cart Machines I've seen are Mini-Disc based, >which seems like an ideal use for them. Random access, high capacity, >low media cost, re-writable, no-noise optical storage. > > --<< Bruce >>-- *doh* Quite right...minidiscs it is. They were playing with zips when I left that department and didn't have contact but I think they were found to be unreliable. -- barnacle http://www.nailed-barnacle.co.uk ###### Message-ID: <3928B741.4C80955E@idirect.com> From: Jerome Fine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc,vmsnet.pdp-11 Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <39266212.C601CB07@dallas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 77 Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 04:26:47 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.161.237.18 X-Complaints-To: abuse@idirect.com X-Trace: quark.idirect.com 958969607 209.161.237.18 (Mon, 22 May 2000 00:26:47 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 00:26:47 EDT Organization: Internet Direct - http://www.mydirect.com Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!brick.direct.ca!quark.idirect.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56822 >Charles Richmond wrote: > Megan wrote: > > Lord Apollyon writes: > > >Nostalgia ain't worth $2k, but what I wanna know is who is PAYING that > > >kind of price? I mean, these greedy dudes don't seem out of business > > >yet - so SOMEONE is willingly taking the knife in the chest (repeatedly) > > >for these pieces of software. > > What you fail to realize is that there are still MANY companies who > > continue to use pdp-11 software. And for that, they need machines. > > Well, PCs are a commodity item nowadays... they're really cheap. > > Since a pdp-11 had a larger initial cost, plus the cost of maintaining > > it, spending $2k for a *very good emulator* which can run all the > > old code can be a real win and not, as you mention, taking a knife in > > the chest. > But...these other PDP-11 emulator companies *could* offer a hobbyist > license, as Mr. John Wilson does. That would *not* materially affect > the money they are making with their software. So if they are *not* > jerks, they are still *not* as nice as John... :-) > +-------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Charles and Francis Richmond | > +-------------------------------------------------------------+ Jerome Fine replies: I want to respond to a number of issues! (a) I want to second the motion that John Wilson (http://www.dbit.com) is nice. (b) The Supnik emulator is also free and is able to run on more than UNIX platforms. In particular, I have a copy which runs under DOS/W95/W98. Although the Supnik emulator lacks MSCP emulator support along with many of the features found in the Eratz-11 emulator from John Wilson, it is still a reasonable and useful emulator, ESPECIALLY since RSTS/RSX/RT-11 are all legal (or at least old versions like V5.3 from RT-11 from 1985) to run under the Supnik emulator. (c) Megan Gentry neglects to mention that the hobby version of Eratz-11 is free. What is not addressed is the use of PDP-11 operating systems by hobby users. In addition, the more than $ US 2000 cost of running software using the commercial versions of the Eratz-11 emulators is due to the high cost of the PDP-11 operating systems. In fact, all of the RSTS/E, RSX-11 and RT-11 license/distribution cost to legally run any of these 3 OSs on a real PDP-11 or the "Lite" version of the Eratz-11 emulator is substantially greater than the license for the "Lite" version of the Eratz-11 emulator. (d) On the other hand, I also agree with Megan Gentry that the cost of the Eratz-11 emulator for a commercial user is very reasonable. In fact, the cost of the "Lite" version of the Eratz-11 emulator is much less than $ US 2000 and if that is all a particular commercial user requires, it is a bargain. (e) Contrary to an interesting response by Stuart Brook, NONE of the above points are are even close to a complaint about the cost of PDP-11 operating system software, especially for commercial users. And if Mr. Brook considers that I am "ranting" on behalf of the hobby users in respect of the cost changed by Mentec for PDP-11 software, perhaps it is because he has a guilty conscience with respect to the prices that are charged for the current versions as opposed to the availability of hobby licenses offered by Compaq/DEC for current VMS licenses. If my post of Sunday, May 21st, 2000 at 15:32:10 GMT does anything, it definitely points out that Mentec does allow very old versions of PDP-11 OSs to be run under the Supnik emulator by hobby users. For a hobby user of RT-11, V5.3 from 1985 can probably run any program that is presently available to be run under RT-11 except those which need I/D space that was first made available under TSX-PLUS and finally with V5.6 of RT-11 in 1992. Since I do not consider that restriction to be a problem and I am positive that almost no RT-11 hobby users care about Y2K issues, I am confident that simply pointing out where the costs occur, for commercial users who want to run up-to-date PDP-11 software, is not in any manner a "rant" on behalf of hobby users of RT-11 who are perfectly content to run V5.3 of RT-11. If Mr. Brook wishes to reply, perhaps he could include a list of the prices that Mentec charges for BOTH the license and the distributions for the 3 major OSs (RSTS/RSX/ RT-11) along with FORTRAN and C and DECnet. Otherwise, I suggest that there is very little use in continuing without knowing what Mr. Brook is being upset about. Sincerely yours, Jerome Fine ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc,vmsnet.pdp-11 From: mbg@world.std.com (Megan) Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 12:25:13 GMT References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <39266212.C601CB07@dallas.net> <39 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Lines: 32 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.umass.edu!world!mbg Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56826 Jerome Fine writes: >(c) Megan Gentry neglects to mention that the hobby version of Eratz-11 >is free. What is not addressed is the use of PDP-11 operating systems by >hobby users. In addition, the more than $ US 2000 cost of running >software using the commercial versions of the Eratz-11 emulators is due >to the high cost of the PDP-11 operating systems. In fact, all of the >RSTS/E, RSX-11 and RT-11 license/distribution cost to legally run any of >these 3 OSs on a real PDP-11 or the "Lite" version of the Eratz-11 >emulator is substantially greater than the license for the "Lite" version >of the Eratz-11 emulator. Firstly, get the name right... John's product is *Ersatz-11* not *Eratz-11*. Secondly, I didn't mention John's free demo version of E11 because I wasn't mentioning his emulator by name at all, I was responding to the initial post which complained about the high cost of an emulator... Finally, the 'high' cost of his full version is *NOT* because of the high cost of the pdp-11 software... John has put a lot of work into E11 over the years (as he documents in another post) and he deserves to get something for it. Megan Gentry Former RT-11 Developer +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ | Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com | | Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com | | Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' | | 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ | | Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler | | (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg | +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ ###### From: Art Rice Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Reply-To: arice.NOcSPAM@ue.itug.org Message-ID: References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 30 Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:10:45 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.94.112.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: typhoon.tampabay.rr.com 959001045 24.94.112.2 (Mon, 22 May 2000 09:10:45 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 09:10:45 EDT Organization: RoadRunner - TampaBay Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!cyclone-southeast.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!typhoon.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56877 On Sat, 20 May 2000 02:50:37 -0700, Charles Richmond wrote: >Kragen Sitaker wrote: >> >> [snip..] [sinp...] [snip...] >> >> Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know, reverse engineering >> is protected by case law, and reading proprietary file formats is a big >> industry. (Companies like Access Data make a lot of money even >> breaking encryption built into proprietary file formats.) >> >I used to think that too...then I heard about a law that makes it a crime >to own a *schematic* of a blue box...or of a cable tv decoder. It is kind >of like the law that allows them to arrest you for possessing burglary tools. >I guess that there is *nothing* else except burlary that could be done with >those tools, huh??? :-) > >Also, as holders of TOP SECRET clearances can tell you, there are things you >know that are illegal to transmit to other people. Actually, everyone with CLASSIFIED and above "probably" has knowledge that they are not at liberty to admit to. -- Art Rice ** Special Data Processing Corporation -------------------------------------- All opinions expressed are mine and do not reflect the views of my employer. ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 38 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:56:29 EDT Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 19:56:29 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.grnet.gr!news-feed1.eu.concert.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56878 In article , Art Rice wrote: >On Sat, 20 May 2000 02:50:37 -0700, Charles Richmond > wrote: > >>Kragen Sitaker wrote: >>> Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know . . . >> >>Also, as holders of TOP SECRET clearances can tell you, there are things you >>know that are illegal to transmit to other people. > >Actually, everyone with CLASSIFIED and above "probably" has knowledge >that they are not at liberty to admit to. "Classified" is a general term including most of the DoD's classifications, notably including confidential, secret, top secret, and SCI. If I knew any classified information (well, I might, but I don't think so) I wouldn't be legally able to tell the public, but that's because of the non-disclosure agreement I signed. If my buddy down the hall is lax about security and leaves classified files on the subway by accident, there's no law prohibiting their discoverers from publishing them. In fact, the Washington Post published a series of classified papers known as the Pentagon Papers in the 1970s, revealing some interesting things. In other words, if you know something top secret, there's no law to prohibit you from transmitting it to somebody else --- unless you promised not to. The UK's Official Secrets Act makes the UK a rather different place. -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3925bd60$0$219@nntp1.ba.best.com> Organization: a user of Best Internet Communications, Inc. www.best.com From: falconer@best.com (Edward A. Falk) Date: 22 May 2000 21:02:07 GMT Lines: 26 Message-ID: <3929a04f$0$209@nntp1.ba.best.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell3.ba.best.com X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 959029327 209 falconer@206.184.139.134 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.enteract.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news2.best.com!news3.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56903 In article , Zane H. Healy wrote: >In alt.sys.pdp10 Edward A. Falk wrote: >> In article , >> Timothy Stark wrote: >>> >>>I still am working on it but I have some problems with it. > >> ... Do you want a GUI front >> panel like on Doug Jones' pdp-8 emulator? I could do that. > >I've not seen, Doug Jones' emulator, but the PDP-8 emulator for the Mac is >fantastic in the way it uses the GUI. Doing a graphical emulation of >devices can make the emulator more intuitive (OK, I confess, it's also cool). I put a screen-shot on line at http://www.best.com/~falconer/pdp8e.gif Anybody have pictures/documentation of a pdp-10 front panel? -- -ed falk, falk@falconer.vip.best.com. See *********************#*************#* http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!**** and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#** to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW**** ###### Message-ID: <3929F09C.74E5C75F@mail.ptd.net> From: "Thomas M. Sommers" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 44 Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 02:49:35 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.186.33.28 X-Complaints-To: abuse@ptd.net X-Trace: nnrp1.ptd.net 959050175 204.186.33.28 (Mon, 22 May 2000 22:49:35 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 22:49:35 EDT Organization: PenTeleData http://www.ptd.net Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!ptdnetP!ptdnetS!newsgate.ptd.net!nnrp1.ptd.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56891 Kragen Sitaker wrote: > > "Classified" is a general term including most of the DoD's > classifications, notably including confidential, secret, top secret, > and SCI. To pick a nit, SCI and the like are not classifications, even though they require special clearance. The only three classifications are confidential, secret, and top secret. > If I knew any classified information (well, I might, but I don't think > so) I wouldn't be legally able to tell the public, but that's because > of the non-disclosure agreement I signed. > > If my buddy down the hall is lax about security and leaves classified > files on the subway by accident, there's no law prohibiting their > discoverers from publishing them. In fact, the Washington Post > published a series of classified papers known as the Pentagon Papers in > the 1970s, revealing some interesting things. > > In other words, if you know something top secret, there's no law to > prohibit you from transmitting it to somebody else --- unless you > promised not to. Not quite. 18 U.S.C. 793(e) says: Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it ... [s]hall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc From: ehrice@his.com (Edward Rice) Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Message-ID: Organization: NDS Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 02:43:33 -0400 References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pm9-202.his.com X-Trace: 23 May 2000 02:43:17 -0400, pm9-202.his.com Lines: 21 X-Authenticated-User: ehrice Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!192.168.1.3!news1.his.com!user Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56926 In article , Art Rice wrote: > >Also, as holders of TOP SECRET clearances can tell you, there are things you > >know that are illegal to transmit to other people. > > Actually, everyone with CLASSIFIED and above "probably" has knowledge > that they are not at liberty to admit to. "Classified" is not a level; do you mean "Confidential"? If so, I disagree. I know people who've had Top Secret clearances who have nothing they have to keep quiet. I had a TS and am not aware of anything that I know that I have to keep quiet about, although I generally err on the keep-quiet side rather than the blab-everything side. ehr ###### Sender: eric@ruckus.brouhaha.com From: Eric Smith Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> X-Disclaimer: Everything I write is false. Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy. Date: 23 May 2000 19:29:15 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 8 X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 NNTP-Posting-Host: ruckus.brouhaha.com X-Trace: 23 May 2000 19:35:53 -0700, ruckus.brouhaha.com Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.sgi.com!news.spies.com!ruckus.brouhaha.com Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56997 kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes: > Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know, reverse engineering > is protected by case law, No longer entirely true, thanks to the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act). The anti-reverse-engineering provisions take effect on 1-Jan-2001. :-( ###### Sender: eric@ruckus.brouhaha.com From: Eric Smith Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <0h%U4.11002$nm6.126033@news-east.usenetserver.com> <8g3fcr$1g0c$2@ausnews.austin.ibm.com> X-Disclaimer: Everything I write is false. Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy. Date: 23 May 2000 19:33:15 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 NNTP-Posting-Host: ruckus.brouhaha.com X-Trace: 23 May 2000 19:39:51 -0700, ruckus.brouhaha.com Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.sgi.com!news.spies.com!ruckus.brouhaha.com Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56994 kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes: > My worry was that the flakes were big enough that you could probably, > in principle, recover the entire contents of the CD given enough flakes "Enough flakes" would be essentially all of the flakes from the actively written portion of the CD. CD data is localized. The error correction system uses convolutional coding so that the contents of a sector are spread out over a few millimeters or so (it's been a while so I don't recall the exact number). If you have half of the flakes from the active data area, for instance, it might well be the case that you could recover some classified data, but certainly not all of it. ###### From: Charles Richmond Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 00:38:16 -0700 Organization: Cannine Computer Center Lines: 26 Message-ID: <392B86E8.76A872CC@dallas.net> References: <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> Reply-To: richmond@dallas.net X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!enews.sgi.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56952 Kragen Sitaker wrote: > > [snip...] [snip...] [snip...] > > If my buddy down the hall is lax about security and leaves classified > files on the subway by accident, there's no law prohibiting their > discoverers from publishing them. In fact, the Washington Post > published a series of classified papers known as the Pentagon Papers in > the 1970s, revealing some interesting things. > > In other words, if you know something top secret, there's no law to > prohibit you from transmitting it to somebody else --- unless you > promised not to. > I do *not* know about the legality of all this...but when I worked for a military contracter in the U.S., we regularly read things in the magazine "Aviation Week" that were considered classified and that we would *not* be at liberty to discuss. I do *not* know how they obtained their information, but it gives one a funny feeling to read something in a public venue that one knows is secret. -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Charles and Francis Richmond | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ ###### From: "Henry W. Miller" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu> Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 09:19:54 -0700 Lines: 50 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4029.2901 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4029.2901 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.126.139.125 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.126.139.125 Message-ID: <392c0125@news2.starnetinc.com> X-Trace: 24 May 2000 11:19:49 -0600, 216.126.139.125 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.enteract.com!chicago-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news2.starnetinc.com!216.126.139.125 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:56967 Dave, "David Cressey" wrote in message news:FpLU4.1011$s4.83221@petpeeve.ziplink.net... > Not that strange, must have been a used one. Or maybe my memory is faulty > on this detail. If I recall, it was the "Frankenstein" (my nickname, not DEC's) machine, built from the remains of several KA-10's. System 26, as I recall, not to be confused with the KL 1026. It was about the most reliable machine in Marlboro at the time, IIRC. It did eventually get moved to Bedford, with the rest of the Ed Services machines. Damn, that was a fun machine to play with. And it could actually support a respectible number of users at one time. And I also seem to recall that they used it for the TOPS-10 Monitor Internals Class for a while. > After all, it was over 20 years ago. I remember checking with the student > to make sure the DECtape drives were DECsystem-10 DECtapes, and not the > DECtapes that went with the PDP-11 front end > for KL systems at that time. > As David mentioned, it WAS over 20 years ago... > > Jim Thomas wrote in message ... > >>>>>> "David" == David Cressey writes: > > > >Late 70's? KA-10? Strange :-) > > > >Nothead > > > > Best, -HWM ###### From: David Razler Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Reply-To: david.razler@worldnet.com Message-ID: References: <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> <392B86E8.76A872CC@dallas.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 104 Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 16:59:26 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.79.64.57 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 959187566 12.79.64.57 (Wed, 24 May 2000 16:59:26 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 16:59:26 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-was.dfn.de!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.72!wnfilter2!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57096 On Wed, 24 May 2000 00:38:16 -0700, Charles Richmond wrote: >Kragen Sitaker wrote: >> >> [snip...] [snip...] [snip...] >> >> If my buddy down the hall is lax about security and leaves classified >> files on the subway by accident, there's no law prohibiting their >> discoverers from publishing them. In fact, the Washington Post >> published a series of classified papers known as the Pentagon Papers in >> the 1970s, revealing some interesting things. The copy of the so-called Pentagon Papers, the military's own analysis of the war in Viet Nam from Dien Ben Fu through the late 1960s was owned, (ownership questionably legal) by former RAND employee Daniel Ellsburg. It was, incidentally, an edited version published by The NYT in both serialized chapters in the paper and book-form. The full four volumes were put on the record, despite their classification by U.S. Sen. Gravel, who broke the informal regulations imposed on senators given access to classified documents at the time and relied on the privilege of his office to do so. And The New York Times was stopped for a while from publishing, and the Supreme Court decision allowing publication to continue was, unfortunately, full of holes posing a danger for the future. >> >> In other words, if you know something top secret, there's no law to >> prohibit you from transmitting it to somebody else --- unless you >> promised not to. There are several laws, including an interesting civil law controlling current and former CIA and NSA employees. They sign a contract requiring everything they write about the agency to be submitted to formal review by the agency for life. There are also post-Pentagon Papers laws that criminalize some disclosure to the press or public, on top of the old laws regarding treason (giving information to another nation-state) The civil contract law deprived former CIA employee Frank Snepp of the profits of his book 'Decent Interval' on the Viet Nam endgame. It has also resulted in cuts and trims in other publications, many trivial and silly, and the labor-intensive work by some authors to get around it James Bamford, late of the NSA, sought out thousands of public documents in order to back up everything in his excellent book on his former employer, 'The Puzzle Palace' to avoid such action. >> >I do *not* know about the legality of all this...but when I worked for a >military contracter in the U.S., we regularly read things in the magazine >"Aviation Week" that were considered classified and that we would *not* >be at liberty to discuss. I do *not* know how they obtained their >information, but it gives one a funny feeling to read something in a >public venue that one knows is secret. The information comes to the journalists through three forms, same way all other journalists get their 'secret' stuff 1) The 'plant' a deliberate government maneuver that can include disinformation as well as fact - well, the information is secret, but we want them to know what we've got, so we'll just happen to give it to.... 2) Conversation with those involved - who either like talking or have an agenda of their own to get the word out. 3) Multiple sources used to connect the dots: one collects all of the public information and casual leaks and puts together the full picture, just as the intelligence organizations do themselves - (see A. Clarke's '2010' for an example of how a minor incident in his fictional future help those in the know to come to a Dramatic Conclusion. I've put together far more mundane stories on matters like local corporate fights and charity fraud this way. You put together everything you can get your hands on until the facts of the matter become clear. It is amazing how computers have helped both journalists and the intelligence trade. For example, by querying two public databases we keep at my paper's in-house computer, I was able to get the phone number of someone trying to hide from the entire world. Took me 29 seconds. And that's using a 90-MHz Pentium, 32 meg, Win 95 and Access. The main difference between reporters and spies is we can't wait to tell EVERYONE what we found out. They keep things secret. I haven't checked in a year or so, but the last time I heard, the oldest document the Pentagon has refused to release on the grounds of national security is entitled 'Troop Movements in Europe, April 1916.' dmr ###### From: "David Cressey" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc References: <8epvur$rep$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <39108b99$0$206@nntp1.ba.best.com> <39112a5a@news2.starnetinc.com> <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <3921E21F.855C2380@cfht.hawaii.edu> <392c0125@news2.starnetinc.com> Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Lines: 43 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 21:16:55 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.206.0.224 X-Trace: petpeeve.ziplink.net 959203015 209.206.0.224 (Wed, 24 May 2000 17:16:55 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 17:16:55 EDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nac.net!nntp1.savvis.net!nntp2.savvis.net!feedme.ziplink.net!petpeeve.ziplink.net!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57078 I was referring to the system at the customer's site, not our system. I managed system 26 for a while. That was a real cobbled together job. FS training put the parts together, and some of us instructors configured the thing. It was good for a lot of courses. Once we moved to Bedford, system 26 was transferred over to employee training. Customer training ended up with newer 10 and 20 systems, but sadly underconfigured for memory. The entire rest of the shop there was PDP-11s, and later VAXen, but the 10 and 20 were the only systems supporting multiple concurrent classes. There will never be another like system 26 for me. The rest of the training center had no clue. For them, it was one class, one machine, one terminal room. And each instructor had his/her own system disk. Oh well, I didn't have a clue about their stuff, either. Somebody tried to explain a VAX to me, in the early days. "It's just what you always want form a PDP-11", he said. I replied: "All I ever wanted from a PDP-11 was to forward my keystrokes to the computer, and put the responses on my screen." That was not an endearing remark. $ exit 732777964 Henry W. Miller wrote in message <392c0125@news2.starnetinc.com>... >Dave, > >"David Cressey" wrote in message >news:FpLU4.1011$s4.83221@petpeeve.ziplink.net... >> Not that strange, must have been a used one. Or maybe my memory is >faulty >> on this detail. > > If I recall, it was the "Frankenstein" (my nickname, not DEC's) machine, >built >from the remains of several KA-10's. System 26, as I recall, not to be ###### From: Art Rice Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Reply-To: arice.NOcSPAM@ue.itug.org Message-ID: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 46 Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:58:59 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.94.112.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: typhoon.tampabay.rr.com 959270339 24.94.112.2 (Thu, 25 May 2000 11:58:59 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 11:58:59 EDT Organization: RoadRunner - TampaBay Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!cyclone-southeast.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!typhoon.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57092 On Tue, 23 May 2000 02:43:33 -0400, ehrice@his.com (Edward Rice) wrote: >In article , >Art Rice wrote: > > > >Also, as holders of TOP SECRET clearances can tell you, there are >things you > > >know that are illegal to transmit to other people. > > > > Actually, everyone with CLASSIFIED and above "probably" has knowledge > > that they are not at liberty to admit to. > >"Classified" is not a level; do you mean "Confidential"? If so, I >disagree. > >I know people who've had Top Secret clearances who have nothing they have >to keep quiet. I had a TS and am not aware of anything that I know that I >have to keep quiet about, although I generally err on the keep-quiet side >rather than the blab-everything side. > >ehr > I actually did mean "Confidential." "Classified" is a communications category. My error. Since all information is released on a need-to-know basis, there are cases where people with Confidential clearance levels were privy to information that could not be discussed. Much of the info with a Confidential tag gets declassified fairly quickly. I may not remember this correctly but if you have Top Secret or Eyes Only access and admit that you know information which can not be discussed, you are in effect, committing a breach of security. So, most people with top level clearance will not admit to being aware of any secrets. "I'm sorry Sir. I can neither confirm nor deny that information." Sound familliar? -- Art Rice ** Special Data Processing Corporation -------------------------------------- All opinions expressed are mine and do not reflect the views of my employer. ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 51 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:46:29 EDT Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 19:46:29 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57011 In article <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com>, Art Rice wrote: >I actually did mean "Confidential." "Classified" is a >communications category. My error. Classified includes confidential, secret, and top secret. >Since all information is released on a need-to-know basis, Most unclassified information is not released on a need-to-know basis. It is released to whoever asks for it. >there are cases where people with >Confidential clearance levels were privy to information that could not >be discussed. Much of the info with a Confidential tag gets >declassified fairly quickly. I have never seen anything classified Confidential --- I thought it had fallen into disuse. I've only worked in the cloak-and-dagger field for a few years, though. >I may not remember this correctly but if you have Top Secret or Eyes >Only access and admit that you know information which can not be >discussed, you are in effect, committing a breach of security. So, >most people with top level clearance will not admit to being aware of >any secrets. > >"I'm sorry Sir. I can neither confirm nor deny that information." >Sound familliar? I can see you have spent a great deal of time studying, um, Hollywood portrayals of military security. :) Unlike most people, I read the reams of documents on security procedures given to me during security indoctrination; I don't recall reading anything suggesting that this is considered a breach of security. As far as I know, I can say, "Hi, I'm Kragen and I know all about classified spread-spectrum communications." on Usenet, without breaking any rules. I think bringing it up like that would be considered suspicious behavior, though; they would start trying to figure out if I was looking for someone to sell the information to. (For the record, I don't know anything about spread-spectrum communications. It was an example. Geez, Guido, let go of my arm.) Also, I'm not sure what "Eyes Only" access is. :) -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### From: Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 21:07:35 -0500 Lines: 21 Message-ID: <79mkg8.665.ln@nashville.com> References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980226 (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.6 (i586)) Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.ntr.net!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57154 In alt.folklore.computers Kragen Sitaker wrote: : I have never seen anything classified Confidential --- I thought it had : fallen into disuse. I've only worked in the cloak-and-dagger field for : a few years, though. I've got some copies of historical material that formerly was classified confidential: microfilms of contract drawings of the 1916 US battle cruisers, bought from the National Archives some years ago. Classification depends on the times, too. The Department of the Navy used to publish a book listing the ships of the US Navy, Ships' Data, that included tabulated descriptions of each ship in the Navy. In the '30s, Ships' Data wasn't classified at all. During WWII the same publication had a Confidential classification. The Restricted classification (which basically meant for official use only) _was_ dropped by the USA during the '70s. Can't think of a cyberfolkloric connection for this, though. ###### From: Charles Richmond Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 04:36:45 -0700 Organization: Cannine Computer Center Lines: 46 Message-ID: <392E61CD.6C866F6@dallas.net> References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> Reply-To: richmond@dallas.net X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!isdnet!howland.erols.net!news.pbi.net.MISMATCH!cyclone-transit.snfc21.pbi.net!216.218.192.242!news.he.net!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57108 Kragen Sitaker wrote: > > [snip...] [snip...] [snip...] > > Art Rice wrote: > >I may not remember this correctly but if you have Top Secret or Eyes > >Only access and admit that you know information which can not be > >discussed, you are in effect, committing a breach of security. So, > >most people with top level clearance will not admit to being aware of > >any secrets. > > > >"I'm sorry Sir. I can neither confirm nor deny that information." > >Sound familliar? > > I can see you have spent a great deal of time studying, um, Hollywood > portrayals of military security. :) > > Unlike most people, I read the reams of documents on security > procedures given to me during security indoctrination; I don't recall > reading anything suggesting that this is considered a breach of > security. As far as I know, I can say, "Hi, I'm Kragen and I know all > about classified spread-spectrum communications." on Usenet, without > breaking any rules. I think bringing it up like that would be > considered suspicious behavior, though; they would start trying to > figure out if I was looking for someone to sell the information to. > I can assure you that Mr. Art Rice is correct. There exists projects whose very names are classified Top Secret. They are conducted in buildings with *no* external signs or markings. (As if that in itself was *not* conspicuous!!!) All very cloak and dagger! I have heard that even people working on the same project could *not* communicate with one another. Another poor thing about having a security clearance (IMHO) is that travel restrictions exist. If you have a Secret or Top Secret clearance, there are certain coutries that you are *not* allowed to visit. I think that you are required to report *any* foreign travel that you do. I currently have *no* clearance, and I am hoping that anything classified that I might have know would by now have expired being classified. (I can *not* remember anything that was classified...*not* even the combinations to my now *non* existant classified safes.) -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Charles and Francis Richmond | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ ###### Message-ID: <392E95A6.F7928D97@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com> <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net> <8g109s$fe7$1@hawkins.cba.uni.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: async24-syd-isp-8.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 959354279 203.101.8.25 (Sat, 27 May 2000 01:17:59 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 01:17:59 EST Distribution: world Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 01:17:59 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57171 > > Five megs? What in the world would you ever do with that much space? :) > > hawk Dunno! I have a collection of C64 programs.... maybe I'll be able to fit them all on, and have room for more!!! My Lisa has a 10Mb HDD!!!! Twice as nice! -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### Message-ID: <392E9C73.2C9F6D75@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> From: Joshua Hrouda Organization: Joshua Hrouda Electronics X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 51 NNTP-Posting-Host: async24-syd-isp-8.nas.one.net.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 959356028 203.101.8.25 (Sat, 27 May 2000 01:47:08 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 01:47:08 EST Distribution: world Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 01:47:00 +1000 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feeder.via.net!news.he.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!newsfeed.ozemail.com.au!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57173 Eric Smith wrote: > kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes: > > Fortunately, in the US, nothing is illegal to know, reverse engineering > > is protected by case law, > > No longer entirely true, thanks to the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright > Act). The anti-reverse-engineering provisions take effect on 1-Jan-2001. > > :-( Back in the early days of DOS, it seemed to be ok to reverse engineer. I learnt about the situation, when Compaq (??) did this to IBM's PC (BIOS maybe?). They didn't get sued, did they ? These days, all EULAs mention "reverse engineer". So they saying you CAN'T rev. eng. it. Now, what's this DMCA say, from 1/1/2000 ?? I beleive we should be able to rev. eng. stuff. That's how people show their appreciation for existing products. It also is called COMPETITION!!! I have created many programs. Any that I'm gonna bother to be serious with, and distribute, I shall mention something like this: "Reverse engineering of this program, and it's associated components, is fully allowed" :) Or I may just do some kinda GPL/open-sauce thing... I still dunno. -- Joshua Hrouda ** ** ******* Joshua Hrouda Electronics ** ** ******* Interweb: jhe.cjb.net ** ** BBS: defunct after about 6 ** ****** ******* users, and not enough ** ****** ******* time :( ** ** ** E-mail: j_hrouda@hotmail. ***** ** ******* com.of.course-no.spam **** ** ******* Ph: (02) 9708-6645 mBox: (02) 8588-8580 IRC: Josh90 ICQ UIN: 12208290 (Josh9.0) Napster: Josh90 Address: 77 Woodbine St, Yagoona, NSW, Australia ###### From: westin*nospam@graphics.cornell.edu (Stephen H. Westin) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: 26 May 2000 11:57:30 -0400 Organization: Cornell University Program of Computer Graphics Lines: 33 Sender: westin@DIESEL Message-ID: References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <392E9C73.2C9F6D75@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: diesel.graphics.cornell.edu X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.nextra.ch!news1.sunrise.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news-xfer.mccc.edu!news.lightlink.com!news.graphics.cornell.edu!news Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57228 Joshua Hrouda writes: > Back in the early days of DOS, it seemed to be ok to reverse engineer. > I learnt about the situation, when Compaq (??) did this to IBM's PC (BIOS > maybe?). > > They didn't get sued, did they ? And IBM has regretted it ever since. > These days, all EULAs mention "reverse engineer". > So they saying you CAN'T rev. eng. it. > Now, what's this DMCA say, from 1/1/2000 ?? It's a U.S. law. As I understand it, various business interests are concerned about unauthorized decoding and copying of movies, music, software, etc. They see the potential loss of revenue as the greatest disaster that could befall mankind, and have influenced the drafting of a law that says, more or less, that unauthorized decrypting or defeating a copy-protection scheme will be illegal under all circumstances. Including, say, when the protection scheme goes awry and makes legally licensed software unusable. And it indemnifies producers of such software from any liability in such cases. Of course, it's just as legal (or not) in Australia as it has always been. -- -Stephen H. Westin Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors. ###### From: Alexandre Pechtchanski Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Organization: Rockefeller University Hospital (GCRC), New York Message-ID: References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> <392E61CD.6C866F6@dallas.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 18 Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 13:20:44 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.85.24.56 X-Trace: rockyd.rockefeller.edu 959361807 129.85.24.56 (Fri, 26 May 2000 13:23:27 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 13:23:27 EDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.nyu.edu!rockyd.rockefeller.edu!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57251 On Fri, 26 May 2000 04:36:45 -0700, Charles Richmond wrote: [ snip ] >... I have heard >that even people working on the same project could *not* communicate >with one another. Ah! That reminds me a joke: three secret guys are discussing whose security is most tight. An american says "we have lots of offices, and those in one office don't know what those in the other offices are doing". An English guy says "Ha! In our secret service even those working in the same office don't know what workers at other desks are doing". Soviet guys says "I can top this easily. I work at this desk for 15 years, and I still don't know what I am doing". -- [ When replying, remove *'s from address ] Alexandre Pechtchanski, Systems Manager, RUH, NY ###### Message-ID: <392EDE9C.87E460A9@thinkage.ca> From: "Alan T. Bowler" Organization: Thinkage Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 12 Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 16:29:16 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.102.11.4 X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 959373049 192.102.11.4 (Fri, 26 May 2000 16:30:49 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 16:30:49 EDT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!torn!news.uunet.ca!nnrp1.uunet.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57131 Kragen Sitaker wrote: > > In article <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com>, > > I have never seen anything classified Confidential --- I thought it had > fallen into disuse. I've only worked in the cloak-and-dagger field for > a few years, though. I don't now about the US, but in Canada "confidential" clearance is used for things that should not be released for privacy reasons, not because of national security. (Individual tax and medical records for example.) ###### Message-ID: <392F24FB.9616EADC@jetnet.ab.ca> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 19:29:31 -0600 From: Ben Franchuk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com> <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net> <8g109s$fe7$1@hawkins.cba.uni.edu> <392E95A6.F7928D97@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <8gn9bf$452$1@newshost.comnet.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.153.6.47 X-Trace: 26 May 2000 20:43:54 -0700, 207.153.6.47 Organization: OA Internet Lines: 16 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!west2.newsfeed.sprint-canada.net!news.oanet.com!207.153.6.47 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57135 G Swaine wrote: > Haven't you all heard of the first rule of computing as laid down by > that wonderful nice-guy Bill Gates: "If it can't fit on a single-sided > single-density floppy disc, then it's too large and must be slimmed > down", which, as we all know, is strictly adhered to by all participants > in the software industry. > Thats true ... Windows does not come under "software" category it comes under "virus" and does not have to follow the above rule.Ben. -- "We do not inherit our time on this planet from our parents... We borrow it from our children." "Ancient Logic" http://www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/al/index.html ###### From: "G Swaine" Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 13:47:10 +1200 Organization: The Gluepot Lines: 38 Message-ID: <8gn9bf$452$1@newshost.comnet.co.nz> References: <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <544.172T2460T6925401@sky.bus.com> <39236bd3$0$85047$3c090ad1@news.plethora.net> <8g109s$fe7$1@hawkins.cba.uni.edu> <392E95A6.F7928D97@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> Reply-To: "G Swaine" NNTP-Posting-Host: dynamic-73.remote.comnet.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.mathworks.com!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!news.netgate.net.nz!newshost.comnet.co.nz!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57209 "Joshua Hrouda" wrote in message news:392E95A6.F7928D97@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com... > > > > Five megs? What in the world would you ever do with that much space? :) > > > > hawk > > Dunno! I have a collection of C64 programs.... maybe I'll be able to fit them all > on, and have room for more!!! > > My Lisa has a 10Mb HDD!!!! Twice as nice! Ten megabits? Dont you mean one-quarter as nice as the five megabyte drive? And a hard disc drive? You're not using it as a file-server for a world-wide network are you? And if so, what are you doing with the leftover space? Haven't you all heard of the first rule of computing as laid down by that wonderful nice-guy Bill Gates: "If it can't fit on a single-sided single-density floppy disc, then it's too large and must be slimmed down", which, as we all know, is strictly adhered to by all participants in the software industry. :) -- Due to the amount of junkmail I've received in the past, this message has bogus From and ReplyTo addresses. I can be contacted via an intermediary : gem at gem win co nz. I would like to apologise to the genuine respondents that this may inconvenience. ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> <392E61CD.6C866F6@dallas.net> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 39 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 23:21:48 EDT Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 03:21:48 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57114 In article <392E61CD.6C866F6@dallas.net>, Charles Richmond wrote: >I can assure you that Mr. Art Rice is correct. There exists projects >whose very names are classified Top Secret. Yes, that's definitely correct --- although I'm not familiar with any of them myself. >They are conducted in >buildings with *no* external signs or markings. (As if that in itself >was *not* conspicuous!!!) All very cloak and dagger! I have heard >that even people working on the same project could *not* communicate >with one another. I don't know enough to confirm or deny most of the above, except that certainly if you have people with different clearances working on the same project, some of them may know things others are not cleared to know. I have not heard of any restrictions on who you could, say, eat lunch with. >Another poor thing about having a security clearance (IMHO) is that >travel restrictions exist. If you have a Secret or Top Secret clearance, >there are certain coutries that you are *not* allowed to visit. Are you sure? I guess they neglected to tell me this when they granted my TS. ;) >I think that you are required to report *any* foreign travel that you do. Yes, and any contact with foreign people --- although my facilities security officer tells me that I'm fine only reporting if they do something suspicious, like ask what I work on. :) -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> <392EDE9C.87E460A9@thinkage.ca> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 24 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 23:24:05 EDT Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 03:24:05 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57116 In article <392EDE9C.87E460A9@thinkage.ca>, Alan T. Bowler wrote: >Kragen Sitaker wrote: >> In article <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com>, >> >> I have never seen anything classified Confidential --- I thought it had >> fallen into disuse. I've only worked in the cloak-and-dagger field for >> a few years, though. > >I don't now about the US, but in Canada "confidential" clearance >is used for things that should not be released for privacy >reasons, not because of national security. (Individual tax and >medical records for example.) In the US, "confidential" classification is used by the DoD for things whose release could cause harm to national security. I can't remember what kind of harm --- "secret" is "severe harm", I think, and "top secret" is "exceptionally severe harm". But I haven't read the refs in a year or two. -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <392E9C73.2C9F6D75@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 43 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 23:32:06 EDT Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 03:32:06 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57105 In article , Stephen H. Westin wrote: >Of course, it[reverse engineering]'s just as legal (or not) in >Australia as it has always been. According to http://slashdot.org/articles/99/08/13/1129253.shtml: Anonymous Coward writes "The Australian government passed legislation yesterday guaranteeing the right to reverse engineer software for the purposes of diagnosing and fixing problems and for interoperability." Looks like WINE and other Windows emulation projects ought to be headquarted in Australia, doesn't it? From the linked press release (http://www.dcita.gov.au/nsapi-text/?MIval=dca_dispdoc&pathid=4189): The Attorney-General, the Hon Daryl Williams AM QC MP and Senator the Hon Richard Alston, Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts announced today that passage of the Copyright Amendment (Computer Programs) Bill 1999 will allow software engineers to decompile computer software in limited circumstances so they can develop interoperable products. Currently software copyright owners can block this type of decompilation as an infringement of copyright. New laws mean developers will be able to decompile software to find this vital interface information if it is not readily available. Overseas developers have been able to do this for some time, particularly in Europe and the United States of America where Australia's main competitors in this sector are located. As you might guess from the /. URL, this press release happened 1999-08-13. So, actually, decompilation (one variety of reverse engineering) used to be frequently illegal in Australia, but now it's been legal for nine months. -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### From: Charles Richmond Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 05:54:41 -0700 Organization: Cannine Computer Center Lines: 35 Message-ID: <392FC592.36156BBF@dallas.net> References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> <392E61CD.6C866F6@dallas.net> Reply-To: richmond@dallas.net X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.direct.ca!news.he.net!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57122 Alexandre Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Fri, 26 May 2000 04:36:45 -0700, Charles Richmond > wrote: > [ snip ] > > >... I have heard > >that even people working on the same project could *not* communicate > >with one another. > > Ah! That reminds me a joke: three secret guys are discussing whose security is > most tight. An american says "we have lots of offices, and those in one office > don't know what those in the other offices are doing". An English guy says "Ha! > In our secret service even those working in the same office don't know what > workers at other desks are doing". Soviet guys says "I can top this easily. I > work at this desk for 15 years, and I still don't know what I am doing". > I have heard something similar...sign in an office: "My job is so secret, not even I know what I am doing." Another east-west joke: In the Kennedy-Kruschev years, an American and a Russian were arguing about whose contry was most free. The American said: "I can stand on the steps of the U.S. capitol building and shout: 'President Kennedy is an idiot!!!'". The Russian said: "That's nothing...I can stand on the steps of the Kremlin and shout: 'President Kennedy is an idiot!!!'" -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Charles and Francis Richmond | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ ###### From: "Don Chiasson" Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 09:15:36 -0400 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> <392EDE9C.87E460A9@thinkage.ca> X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news-was.dfn.de!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.he.net!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57219 Kragen Sitaker wrote in message ... >In article <392EDE9C.87E460A9@thinkage.ca>, >Alan T. Bowler wrote: >>Kragen Sitaker wrote: >>> In article <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com>, >>I don't now about the US, but in Canada "confidential" clearance >>is used for things that should not be released for privacy >>reasons, not because of national security. (Individual tax and >>medical records for example.) > >In the US, "confidential" classification is used by the DoD for things >whose release could cause harm to national security. I can't remember >what kind of harm --- "secret" is "severe harm", I think, and "top >secret" is "exceptionally severe harm". But I haven't read the refs in >a year or two. In Canada, "confidential" as well as "secret" and "top secret" mean the same as in the U.S. If they don't it gets complicated deciding what handling procedures to use. Canada does have the designation "protected" to cover privacy issues. Don ###### Message-ID: <393019FF.921D1963@mail.ptd.net> From: "Thomas M. Sommers" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 7 Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 18:59:44 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.186.33.226 X-Complaints-To: abuse@ptd.net X-Trace: nnrp1.ptd.net 959453984 204.186.33.226 (Sat, 27 May 2000 14:59:44 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 14:59:44 EDT Organization: PenTeleData http://www.ptd.net Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.mathworks.com!ptdnetP!ptdnetS!newsgate.ptd.net!nnrp1.ptd.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57132 Art Rice wrote: > > Much of the info with a Confidential tag gets > declassified fairly quickly. I once saw a message from some Air Farce command that contained the instructions, "Declassify upon receipt." ###### From: Art Rice Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Reply-To: arice.NOcSPAM@ue.itug.org Message-ID: <83k7js0vddrpmlho1his1h8mh334stht4b@4ax.com> References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> <79mkg8.665.ln@nashville.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 34 Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 14:34:55 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.94.112.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: typhoon.tampabay.rr.com 959697295 24.94.112.2 (Tue, 30 May 2000 10:34:55 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 10:34:55 EDT Organization: RoadRunner - TampaBay Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.cwix.com!cyclone-southeast.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!typhoon.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57340 On Thu, 25 May 2000 21:07:35 -0500, wrote: >In alt.folklore.computers Kragen Sitaker wrote: > >: I have never seen anything classified Confidential --- I thought it had >: fallen into disuse. I've only worked in the cloak-and-dagger field for >: a few years, though. > >I've got some copies of historical material that formerly was >classified confidential: microfilms of contract drawings of >the 1916 US battle cruisers, bought from the National Archives >some years ago. Classification depends on the times, too. >The Department of the Navy used to publish a book listing the >ships of the US Navy, Ships' Data, that included tabulated >descriptions of each ship in the Navy. In the '30s, Ships' Data >wasn't classified at all. During WWII the same publication >had a Confidential classification. > >The Restricted classification (which basically meant for official >use only) _was_ dropped by the USA during the '70s. > >Can't think of a cyberfolkloric connection for this, though. Confidential also showed up quite a bit during the 60s and 70s. For Kragen: "Eyes Only" is a Brittish classification. -- Art Rice ** Special Data Processing Corporation -------------------------------------- All opinions expressed are mine and do not reflect the views of my employer. ###### From: Art Rice Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Reply-To: arice.NOcSPAM@ue.itug.org Message-ID: References: <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> <392EDE9C.87E460A9@thinkage.ca> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 14:39:39 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.94.112.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: typhoon.tampabay.rr.com 959697579 24.94.112.2 (Tue, 30 May 2000 10:39:39 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 10:39:39 EDT Organization: RoadRunner - TampaBay Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!cyclone-southeast.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!typhoon.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57339 On Fri, 26 May 2000 16:29:16 -0400, "Alan T. Bowler" wrote: >Kragen Sitaker wrote: >> >> In article <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com>, >> >> I have never seen anything classified Confidential --- I thought it had >> fallen into disuse. I've only worked in the cloak-and-dagger field for >> a few years, though. > >I don't now about the US, but in Canada "confidential" clearance >is used for things that should not be released for privacy >reasons, not because of national security. (Individual tax and >medical records for example.) When I did my service, early 70s, there were some equipments that had been declassified but the purpose for which they had been built (and the end-users) was still considered "Confidential" information. When I was discharged it was still confidential. -- Art Rice ** Special Data Processing Corporation -------------------------------------- All opinions expressed are mine and do not reflect the views of my employer. ###### From: Art Rice Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Reply-To: arice.NOcSPAM@ue.itug.org Message-ID: References: <8g3ssq$h76$1@null.agames.com> <8g46rk$9dm$1@null.agames.com> <7ciV4.21866$nm6.358015@news-east.usenetserver.com> <39265FEC.8664E8CA@dallas.net> <4miqis840pjq3lihl9agnm71mctak6fg1v@4ax.com> <393019FF.921D1963@mail.ptd.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 19 Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 14:40:36 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.94.112.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: typhoon.tampabay.rr.com 959697636 24.94.112.2 (Tue, 30 May 2000 10:40:36 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 10:40:36 EDT Organization: RoadRunner - TampaBay Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!cyclone-southeast.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!typhoon.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57338 On Sat, 27 May 2000 18:59:44 GMT, "Thomas M. Sommers" wrote: >Art Rice wrote: >> >> Much of the info with a Confidential tag gets >> declassified fairly quickly. > >I once saw a message from some Air Farce command that contained the >instructions, "Declassify upon receipt." Can't get much quicker than that. -- Art Rice ** Special Data Processing Corporation -------------------------------------- All opinions expressed are mine and do not reflect the views of my employer. ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator References: <79mkg8.665.ln@nashville.com> <83k7js0vddrpmlho1his1h8mh334stht4b@4ax.com> Organization: None X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999) From: kragen@dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) Lines: 10 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Complaints-To: support@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:32:22 EDT Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 15:32:22 GMT Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!skynet.be!europa.netcrusader.net!63.211.125.72!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!cyclone1.usenetserver.com!news-east.usenetserver.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57306 In article <83k7js0vddrpmlho1his1h8mh334stht4b@4ax.com>, Art Rice wrote: >For Kragen: "Eyes Only" is a Brittish classification. Oh, OK --- thanks for the clarification. What does it mean? -- Kragen Sitaker The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! The power didn't go out on 2000-01-01 either. :) ###### From: jmfbahciv@aol.com Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator Date: Thu, 01 Jun 00 09:10:47 GMT Organization: UltraNet Communications, Inc. Lines: 34 Message-ID: <8h5j8s$lo9$1@bob.news.rcn.net> References: <3917354f$0$221@nntp1.ba.best.com> <3921366D.63DE7F92@hotmail.spamlite.low-salt.low-fat.com> <39213818.F258CA84@netinsight.se> <392154b7_1@news.wizvax.net> X-Trace: CgdlATgFmjzAQqNRNSkDtX63K5jTgbflDbJy92z8/Cc= X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Jun 2000 12:00:28 GMT X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4 Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!207-172-97-14 Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57396 In article , aek@spies.com (Al Kossow) wrote: >In article , Terry Kennedy >wrote: > >> you might be able to get there by taking the SCSI interface >> > out of one of the SCSI 9-track drives (at least, I know Qualstar does it by >> > makign their SCSI interface drive the Pertec interface on the back side) and >> > hanging it on a 7-track drive. >> > >Good luck FINDING a 7 track drive. The last one I heard about was a >7 track TU10 on eBay last year. I'm REALLY happy that I don't have any >tapes that are 7 track :-) > >I remember hearing a story about Stanford scrambling around trying to >find a 7 track TU10 in the late 80's to try to read SAIL tapes. Why a TU10? That would guarantee an inability to read. We had a TU71 (TU70 7-track) that we had to have just because we had customer who owned tapes that were written on 7-track drives, may own a 7-track drive, or might own 7-track drives. It was one of the distasteful side effects of backwards compatibility support. Having this drive on our system (it was the only 7-track in DEC) was a part of the downsizing of OSes. One of the distribution options of our software was 7- or 9- track magtapes. /BAH Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail. ###### Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator From: bmarcum@iglou.com X-Everything: Net-Tamer V 1.08X NNTP-Posting-Host: lou-ts7-37.iglou.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lou-ts7-37.iglou.com Message-ID: <39386a76_1@news.iglou.com> Date: 2 Jun 2000 22:16:22 -0500 X-Trace: 2 Jun 2000 22:16:22 -0500, lou-ts7-37.iglou.com Organization: IgLou Internet Services, Inc. Lines: 9 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: news-incoming.iglou.com Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news-fra1.dfn.de!unlisys!news.snafu.de!newsfeedZ.netscum.dQ!netscum.int!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!europa.netcrusader.net!63.208.208.143!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!uunet!ffx.uu.net!news.iglou.com!lou-ts7-37.iglou.com Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:57506 On 2000-05-30 kragen@dnaco.net(KragenSitaker) said: >In article <83k7js0vddrpmlho1his1h8mh334stht4b@4ax.com>, >Art Rice wrote: >>For Kragen: "Eyes Only" is a Brittish classification. >Oh, OK --- thanks for the clarification. What does it mean? Look but don't touch.. Net-Tamer V 1.08X - Test Drive ###### Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.org.decus,comp.emulators.misc,vmsnet.pdp-11 Subject: Re: PDP-10 Emulator From: yodathejediknight@att.net (Gregg C Levine) X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit) References: <8eoa1a$7p1@journal.concentric.net> <390FEFB6.72AD7D9D@trailing-edge.com> <39266212.C601CB07@dallas.net> <3928B741.4C80955E@idirect.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Lines: 130 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:01:42 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.88.195.218 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 961369302 12.88.195.218 (Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:01:42 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:01:42 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Path: chonsp.franklin.ch!pfaff.ethz.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news.ifi.unizh.ch!news.imp.ch!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.20!wnmasters3!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: chonsp.franklin.ch alt.folklore.computers:58151 Hello from Gregg C Levine the Master Jedi I also want to contribute to this concept. Even the demo version is a capable demonstration. John Wilson even invited me to develop, and expand on the Fuzzball software that he provides. Now about that version of your emulator, the Supnik emulator, you say you have a copy that runs under the usual IBMPC OSes, and hardware configurations. Fine. Where can I get my copy? Please contact me off of this group. Gregg C Levine yodathejediknight@att.net In article <3928B741.4C80955E@idirect.com>, jhfine@idirect.com says... > >>Charles Richmond wrote: > >> Megan wrote: >> > Lord Apollyon writes: >> > >Nostalgia ain't worth $2k, but what I wanna know is who is PAYING that >> > >kind of price? I mean, these greedy dudes don't seem out of business >> > >yet - so SOMEONE is willingly taking the knife in the chest (repeatedly) >> > >for these pieces of software. >> > What you fail to realize is that there are still MANY companies who >> > continue to use pdp-11 software. And for that, they need machines. >> > Well, PCs are a commodity item nowadays... they're really cheap. >> > Since a pdp-11 had a larger initial cost, plus the cost of maintaining >> > it, spending $2k for a *very good emulator* which can run all the >> > old code can be a real win and not, as you mention, taking a knife in >> > the chest. >> But...these other PDP-11 emulator companies *could* offer a hobbyist >> license, as Mr. John Wilson does. That would *not* materially affect >> the money they are making with their software. So if they are *not* >> jerks, they are still *not* as nice as John... :-) >> +-------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | Charles and Francis Richmond | >> +-------------------------------------------------------------+ > >Jerome Fine replies: > >I want to respond to a number of issues! > >(a) I want to second the motion that John Wilson (http://www.dbit.com) is nice. > >(b) The Supnik emulator is also free and is able to run on more than UNIX >platforms. In particular, I have a copy which runs under DOS/W95/W98. >Although the Supnik emulator lacks MSCP emulator support along with many >of the features found in the Eratz-11 emulator from John Wilson, it is still a >reasonable and useful emulator, ESPECIALLY since RSTS/RSX/RT-11 are >all legal (or at least old versions like V5.3 from RT-11 from 1985) to run under the >Supnik emulator. > >(c) Megan Gentry neglects to mention that the hobby version of Eratz-11 is free. >What is not addressed is the use of PDP-11 operating systems by hobby users. >In addition, the more than $ US 2000 cost of running software using the commercial >versions of the Eratz-11 emulators is due to the high cost of the PDP-11 operating >systems. In fact, all of the RSTS/E, RSX-11 and RT-11 license/distribution cost >to legally run any of these 3 OSs on a real PDP-11 or the "Lite" version of the >Eratz-11 emulator is substantially greater than the license for the "Lite" version >of the Eratz-11 emulator. > >(d) On the other hand, I also agree with Megan Gentry that the cost of the Eratz-11 >emulator for a commercial user is very reasonable. In fact, the cost of the "Lite" version >of the Eratz-11 emulator is much less than $ US 2000 and if that is all a particular >commercial user requires, it is a bargain. > >(e) Contrary to an interesting response by Stuart Brook, NONE of the above points >are are even close to a complaint about the cost of PDP-11 operating system >software, especially for commercial users. And if Mr. Brook considers that I am >"ranting" on behalf of the hobby users in respect of the cost changed by Mentec >for PDP-11 software, perhaps it is because he has a guilty conscience with respect >to the prices that are charged for the current versions as opposed to the availability >of hobby licenses offered by Compaq/DEC for current VMS licenses. If my post >of Sunday, May 21st, 2000 at 15:32:10 GMT does anything, it definitely points out >that Mentec does allow very old versions of PDP-11 OSs to be run under the >Supnik emulator by hobby users. For a hobby user of RT-11, V5.3 from 1985 >can probably run any program that is presently available to be run under RT-11 >except those which need I/D space that was first made available under TSX-PLUS >and finally with V5.6 of RT-11 in 1992. Since I do not consider that restriction to >be a problem and I am positive that almost no RT-11 hobby users care about Y2K >issues, I am confident that simply pointing out where the costs occur, for commercial >users who want to run up-to-date PDP-11 software, is not in any manner a "rant" >on behalf of hobby users of RT-11 who are perfectly content to run V5.3 of RT-11. >If Mr. Brook wishes to reply, perhaps he could include a list of the prices that Mentec >charges for BOTH the license and the distributions for the 3 major OSs (RSTS/RSX/ >RT-11) along with FORTRAN and C and DECnet. Otherwise, I suggest that there >is very little use in continuing without knowing what Mr. Brook is being upset about. > >Sincerely yours, > >Jerome Fine >